this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
591 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

11846 readers
495 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BabyVi@lemmy.world 238 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Not gonna lie, if a Furry told me they got arrested by animal control I'd be impressed.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is there anyone at cons who plays that role? Like walking around with a big net and a villainous smirk?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 202 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I've got to admit that Republicans are always finding new and creative ways to be outrageously villainous and hateful

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 140 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s because furries are overwhelmingly queer and often used as a stand in for fear mongering about trans people (ex: the “litter boxes in schools” rumor).

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Furries are the next target after trans people.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would say it’s more that they recognize furries are largely a queer subculture (regardless of the fact that straight furries exist) and correctly recognize it as less objectionable to most people’s sensibilities to say you’re getting furries removed from schools by animal control than it is to say you’re getting queer kids removed from schools by animal control.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It sounds really outlandish until you remember that in the 80s, DnD was used to make everyone afraid of a literal Satan, and we ended up with children testifying they were flown across the country and back to participate in Satanic rituals or flushed down toilets into hidden chambers where people were sacrificing live animals to the Dark Lord in the 8-9 hours they were at daycare.

People went to prison over this.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 8 months ago

In the early 90s my mom was convinced Satanic women got pregnant and gave birth to babies to murder in rituals, and nobody could prove it because they gave birth outside a hospital and no record of the children existed.

I get some of the 80s/90s nostalgia but SO much of it was just actual hell lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention wrong. Sounds like a result of the litterbox panic from a little while ago.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 53 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Which stemmed from an active shooter measure that would have allowed kids to relieve themselves without out having to leave the safety of their hiding place.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Newtra@pawb.social 181 points 8 months ago (4 children)

anthropomorphic behavior

Anyone else morbidly curious about what happens if they don't fix the bill's wording and accidentally ban "human-shaped behavior" at school?

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 8 months ago

SSSHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 8 months ago

How ironic. By trying to make people not act like animals, they force everyone to behave like animals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 175 points 8 months ago (1 children)

On one hand, this has got to be public trolling. On the other, it’s still a bill calling for a classification of people to be removed from society. If it weren’t so scary it would be funny.

[–] auk@fedia.io 79 points 8 months ago

Fascism demands outlandish "enemies" in order to justify punishment as policy. Usually, no suitable ones exist, so they are created through outlandish fantasy.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 128 points 8 months ago
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 105 points 8 months ago (6 children)

How does Oklahoma have nothing else to legislate on?

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago

They have plenty, but they'd rather distract from society's issues as much as possible so their arctic temperature IQ constituents don't realize how bad they have it

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

If they can keep everyone distracted by The Gays™ or whatever other sexual deviancy the redhats can dream up, then maybe people won't notice the roads falling apart or the useless police, or more importantly, which people are stealing all the money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 104 points 8 months ago (25 children)

Humphrey's bill, House Bill 3084, would ban "students who purport to be an imaginary animal or animal species, or who engage in anthropomorphic behavior commonly referred to as furries at school" from participating in class and school activities.

This is, hands down, the worst description of furries I have ever read in my entire life.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hell, it sounds like something Kindergarteners have been doing since forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 30 points 8 months ago

So what I'm hearing is if I tell the teacher I'm a platypus I don't have to go to class?

Guaranteed if this law got passed there would be a high school somewhere where the entire student body shows up wearing cat ears.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 82 points 8 months ago (18 children)

Imagine being an animal control guy and having a school seriously call you and ask you to take a stranger's child because of that child's participation in a subculture.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)

“Here kiddy kiddy kiddy”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lawmaker: "If these flurries think they're animals, we're gonna treat them like animals! "

Furries: "Yes, that's exactly what we want."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abracaDavid@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago (4 children)

For the love of god, please don't. You're just making them hornier.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 63 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Moral panic.

The right isn't happy unless it's panicked about some moral outrage. In the absence of anything to be panicked about they make things up to be panicked about.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I just described this phenomenon to a friend of mine today. We were talking about how racism evolved by the same people to be disgust against gay/trans folk. I explained to him that conservatives require an outgroup to hate on in order to operate and be happy.

This mother fucker took a second and said "Do you think modern conservative discrimination was caused by the fall of the Soviet union? I mean, when communism was a big threat everybody was united and happy hating the soviets"

My boy really trying to paint the red scare as a good thing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Imagine if this passes and the next day the entire school staff dresses up as furries in protest. "Okay Timmy you see that person with the fox outfit on? That's your teacher today."

honestly small children might love that

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Those masks are expensive as shit though, aren't they?

[–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Yeah, a decent one is going to be $300-500. For a partial, the head is the most expensive part, and cheaping out on it is a great way to get some S-tier nightmare fuel. Full suits are minimum $1000, but I'd say a good one is at least double that, and they can go into the $5k+ range.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Who is Oklahoma Rep. Justin Humphrey?

Humphrey has made headlines in recent years in his advocacy of prison reform, capital punishment reform and rural development.

Oh I see now, he's a dumb fuck white, rural, racist dumbass who saw something on the internet that made him feel funny and then tried to pray and then legislate the feelings away.

Also more on Justin Humphrey via wikipedia:

Humphrey's efforts to introduce cockfighting legislation[27] has led to the outcry from animal rights advocates[28] and the former attorney general.[29] Oklahoma has been called the "Cockfighting Capitol of the United States."[30] HB 2530, pushed by Justin Humphrey, died on April 13, 2023, for the second year in a row. Tulsa District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler said he was glad cockfighting remained a felony.[31] Transphobia and homophobia

Humphrey has made multiple transphobic comments. In an email responding to a constituent Humphrey said "I understand transgender people have mental illness".[32] This view is not supported by the World Health Organization or the American Psychiatric Association.[32] In an interview published after the incident on April 15, 2021, Humphrey doubled down by saying "I want to tell your audience there is no transgender. There is male and there is female. And transgender would be a mental health issue... So those people that say I'm bigoted, I will say you're insane and you're doing the people wrong by doing that."[32] Freedom Oklahoma, an LGBT advocacy group, denounced Humphrey's comments calling them "a long-debunked myth".[32]

Humphrey was quoted as saying “You’re dang skippy I’ll take my kid to a chicken fighting before I’m gonna take them to see a drag queen."[31]

On the flip side, myself and my high school friends way, way back in the day would have a had a field day with this type of dumbass law. Would be a shame if this passed and students were to test the law and their parents and their state/local traffic engineers who probably didn't think of this type of dumbass shit ever happening.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Can't wait to see the reporting on the fallout from this, if it goes forward.

Bureaucratic backlash from department heads at Animal Control, and whichever state administration or department that their chain of authority ultimately flows down from.

Overzealous Animal Control officer who assaults a child that a school administrator called in for pickup.

Mass student protests of dozens of kids going to school as furries

And that's just a few off the top of my head. The possibilities are endless.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Mass student protests of dozens of kids going to school as furries

This sounds like the kind of protest id participate in when I was in school. As a parent I'd totally wear a fur suit to pick up my kids as a form of protest

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 27 points 8 months ago

For real, shit-disturbing teenage me would have immediately flipped from "furries are dumb and weird" to "what's the minimum requirement to count as a furry" as soon as I found out that animal control would have to pick us up.

The thought of an old-school dog catcher chasing me with a net while I ran away wearing floppy dog ears is just too amazing to pass up.

What about a fish. Could I be a fish? Oh, what a time to be grown up and with kids of my own instead of being able to be a ridiculous jackass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

I wonder if this will be the end of school mascots in Oklahoma

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Jesus christ do these law makers just have nothing going on? We should really be revoking their pay for what is a complete dumpster fire of a waste of our taxes. I don't want my money going to some white racist dumb fuck basing reality off of Fox news rage articles in his Facebook feed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] malle_yeno@pawb.social 42 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Furry here and just want to say: isn't this entire discussion super disrespectful to the important job that animal control personnel actually do?

Like, animal control has an important role in protecting communities from animals and helping animals that are injured. They shouldn't have to be dragged into this stupid outrage farming.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (15 children)

My daughter got bullied by other kids for being a furry because she likes leather chokers and they were saying she was wearing a dog collar.

Considering how much school administrations support bullies (while claiming to be anti-bullying), I'm glad we weren't in Oklahoma.

We had to take her out of school due to all of the bullying anyway, but that would have made it even worse.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not legal for animal control to pick up a person even in Oklahoma, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VolcanoWonderpants@pawb.social 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At first I thought this was satire, but I'm seeing similar articles in tons of other places like Huffpost and Vice. So this is actually true?! Stay strong, my friends...

(I don't have a fursuit or see myself as an animal or anything, but this is crazy. And a total waste of resources too. Hopefully voters are educated enough to see that this is absurd.)

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's true that such a bill was introduced, but wacky bills are introduced all the time. This is proposed legislation, they haven't even voted on it yet, and it's extremely unlikely to pass.

But i think it's also true that you can tell where legislator's minds are based on what wacky bills they introduce.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Oooh harder daddy

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how the dude who wrote the bill would fare against real animals, considering he's so afraid of people dressed like them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I once met a person that was made to believe that "animal-kin" children were being given their own litter boxes in a similar way that transgender children would get their own bathrooms.

The issue with the people who think like this is that they see a few things not like them (a few transgender people) and extrapolate it to utter nonsense (millions of children declaring themselves animals and demanding litter boxes).

If they would think about what they are saying; they would reliaze that their claims are impossible. But then again, they are in their own reality where everything they do makes sense..?

I'm sorry for using such an absurd example but it's a thing older conservatives I know actually believe in.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

So he is just trolling to get headlines and get his name in the papers.

load more comments
view more: next ›