If your predecessor beat the guy by using platform A, it stands to reason that a pretty safe campaign strategy is to not deviate from platform A very much.
ashok36
joined 1 year ago
This is it. If were talking about immigrants not eating pets, we're not talking about how Harris whooped trumps ass.
When I took anatomy class in high school we dissected euthanized cats. I'm not sure if they do that anymore but it was standard at the time.
All his kids were from ivf or artificial insemination. I'm not convinced he's ever seen a vagina.
Cantina chicken burrito with the green sauce in the packet. It's better than you'd get at most of the fake Mexican chain restaurants in my city. Not as good as the authentic places but the price can't be beat.
I have a litter robot 3 and it's great. It was costly but I've probably already made a significant amount back on litter cost. The cats took some time to get used to it and one of them refused without adding a set of steps to get in but all in all they seem happy 18months later.
That's your right and I support you but... If your standard is "I don't buy products that are made by bad people"... You're gonna have a tough time. No such thing as ethical capitalism and all that.
And Trump has his secret weapon: lying out of his ass with no fact checking. Guess which one will win.
How am I siding with a corporation? The only people involved are the guy harassing people for YouTube views and the people he's harassing.
The stores aren't involved in the altercations at all, other than to say "we don't give a shit if you leave your cart out. If we did, we would do something about it."
view more: next ›
The thing is, without gerrymandering they'd still have a majority of seats. They're not content with that though. Why have 57% of the seats when you could have 79% and be completely inoculated from consequences or the feedback of any constituencies?