moon

joined 10 months ago
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 8 hours ago
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you even talking about

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Except those people tied themselves to the track and started the train themselves... Completely voluntarily.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I think the massive privacy benefits outweigh things like that, which should be documented properly anyways

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 day ago (12 children)

That's a terrible way to think

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago

How can this man be so based. The world simply didn't deserve him.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 3 days ago

I'm cool with that but let me get one with better IVs

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 days ago

No way that's crazy (I didn't read any of that)

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe -3 points 3 days ago

mail in votes are literally communism

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

To actually keep data persistent on IPFS and not be deleted by the garbage collector, you need to have a server(s) pin the node that holds that data.

You either host these servers yourself, or pay providers to store it for you.

And at that point you just reinvented a server simply hosting your data but with extra steps.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a big issue with this.

If malicious content like CP gets uploaded on to a server, obviously other servers do not want this to be replicated to their servers. So how would you solve this problem? Well they could give all moderation power to the original server they're replicating, but that could be far too slow or they could even miss malicious content like this. Or maybe they even disagree about taking down certain things.

Another solution is that any server participating in the content mirroring could take it down for just themselves or for all the other members as well. The issue here is now you're expanding moderation abilities, while also giving the other servers much more responsibilities.

It's not as simple as wanting to replicate content. If you host it, you are responsible for any illegal content a user may upload to it. Not to mention laws vary by country as well. Ignoring the technical challenges here, it's also mandatory that the other servers replicate the other servers data to also choose to be responsible for what gets uploaded. And that is a really big ask. The law doesn't care about the technical reasons, they'll just see illegal content uploaded to your server.

view more: next ›