this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
629 points (97.6% liked)

movies

1733 readers
948 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (9 children)

i feel like it’s much harder when you finish a movie, and you hate it, and then find out it’s one of the most critically acclaimed movies of all time.

this was my experience watching taxi driver. to this day, i have not been able to find a single other person who disliked that movie as much as i did

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I cannot stand 2001 A Space Odyssey

It's glacially paced, there's like 1 good scene with HAL and Dave and the rotating set is neat with him running around the edge. It's about 20 minutes of decent movie padded to an agonising two and a half hours of pretentious nonsense.

People go "oh, but it was groundbreaking at the time!" We'd had Star Trek for two years by that point. It really was not that groundbreaking.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like you have to go in knowing it's extremely slow and methodical, it really gives room to breath and take in the sights and such. Idk it's a very interestingly shot movie and I wish more were like it, seems like people's attention spans aren't long enough though.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Also seeing it in a real theater makes a big difference

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 hours ago

Both of those movies are on my watchlist. My family saw 2001 A Space Odyssey and they HATED it.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

exactly how i feel about it too. the 5 minute long segment that was just nature footage with weird visual filters was also particularly hard to watch.

i also found the whole obelisk thing super repetitive. i was hoping that they would go into more detail about the obelisks, and explore the topic more. but it ended up feeling like they were asking the question “what’s a list of weird times and places where we could put an obelisk”, and that was the extent of it.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I turned off Oppenheimer, felt so pretentious and over the top serious to me. I already knew people love it, though.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Wife and i turned it off halfway because it was sooooo boring

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

thank you! i also couldn’t stand that movie. watching oppenheimer felt like watching a 3 hour trailer for oppenheimer. i can’t understand nolan’s refusal to let a scene last for more than 1 minute

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I’d imagine this happens a lot more often than the OP’s scenario. Some complete garbage becomes “critical darling” for whatever reasons.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

That's how I felt about Paranormal Activity. It was like I spent the entire movie waiting for something scary to happen. A thing just... stood there. Every "night" on screen felt the same: a being... just standing there. Not standing there sharpening a knife. Not standing there ominously stroking people's cheeks. Nothing attacked or even made threats to do so. It just. fucking. stood. there.

Then when something finally started to happen, the movie ended.

I don't know if my standards for "scary" are too high, but I found the entire film (save for those last few seconds) to be extremely boring. How it's so popular (and even spawned a sequel?!) is beyond me.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 1 points 24 minutes ago

Absolute trash for me as well. I watched it alone when I was slightly drunk, thinking oh boy, let's put on something scary. Absolutely nothing happened. Few movies have left me angry. Insane it has such good critic score.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That was how I felt about Blair Witch. Full disclosure, I don't like horror to begin with, but to me the movie was about a group of people in the woods with a scary thing somewhere, and when they finally find the thing it ends.

It's like if Texas Chainsaw was about a bunch of teenagers who stood around while you hear a chainsaw running somewhere in the distance, the cuts to black right when the killer shows up.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 27 minutes ago

Blair Witch′s whole shtick of being the first (at least well known) found footage film is interesting from historical perspective, but that's about it. Much better than Paranormal Activity though.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

It's been a while and I can't remember which one it was that I saw, but I remember that ending coming out of nowhere. It's like oh, there's a ghost or something haunting the place, ok. Signs of evil or something, a person floating while sleeping, too iirc.

Then suddenly there's hundreds of witches or cultists surrounding them outside and it just ends!?

Maybe it would have been scary if I was the type to buy into moral panics?

It was just kinda creepy and then weird. Felt like "rocks fall, everyone dies" kinda energy.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I get this, other than Pulp Fiction, I dislike all of Tarantino's films.

I don't like the style or the pacing, I don't like the revisionist take on events.

But people generally like his films.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

i can sympathize with this. i also didn’t like many of the tarantino movies that i’ve seen for similar reasons. the feet stuff also doesn’t help his case.

[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh my god I just watched taxi driver and thought it was mediocre at best. Gave it 2 1/2 stars. Saw that it sits at 4,2?!?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

taxi driver felt like it was asking the question “what if we made a movie where nothing happens?”. and apparently, if you make the main character “disturbed” enough, the answer is that the movie becomes one of the greatest films of all time.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Taxi Driver is a movie I can recognize as being a great piece of art that I don't enjoy.

[–] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Was also very underwhelmed by taxi driver.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

it’s nice to know i’m not the only one

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Same, not for Taxi Driver, but for The Deer Hunter, Chinatown, Life is Beautiful, Amour...

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

i also wasn’t very impressed by chinatown. i remember feeling like i spent the whole time waiting for the movie to “start”, and then it ended