moonlight

joined 5 months ago
[–] moonlight@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That’s not what I’m saying at all. I’m saying it would be best if content on remote instances wasn’t censored when viewed on a local instance, even if that user was banned locally.

I think this problem is hard to get around though with how all content has to be hosted locally.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand the liability issue, I guess this is just an inherent tradeoff with how the fediverse works.

I at least think there could be a two stage ban, ‘no posting here’ and ‘block everything’.

Also, defederation could still be used for instances that fail to moderate, although I do agree that fully blocking a user is much preferable to the nuclear option.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

I think it would be better if bans only applied to posting on an instance, and each instance/community would self moderate. If I go to a post, I want to see the whole discussion, and not have certain people hidden from me by my home instance. Let the instance hosting the community filter out spam.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't really thought through the details.

It would probably take decades to prepare, and to figure out what the best approach would be.

It also depends on how much I could bring back.

If it's just me and what I can carry, I think I would just bring a few things to demonstrate the tech. Maybe a high power flashlight and solar charger. The important part would be a detailed guide on how to re-enginer everything we have today, as well as the science behind it. Really, I think scientific knowledge would be the most impactful.

If this was a huge operation with near infinite resources, I would send back a giant self sustaining compound with a general purpose factory. I think it would probably be possible to sustain a roughly 60s level of technology indefinitely on a small scale until the rest of the world caught up

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Depends on the rules.

Round trip to a 'read only' version of the past? I'd like to see the dinosaurs.

Round trip that can make changes? Probably a few hundred or even thousand years ago, so I could give them modern technology, information about climate change, try to educate people on social issues, etc. I'd create detailed instructions and try to make a religion out of it. There's no guarantee it would work, but I'd hopefully return to a solarpunk utopia. Honestly not sure if I would try this, as it would basically overwrite everything I've ever known.

One way trip? I'd probably pass, unless I can de-age. I would definitely want to go back to being a child with all my current knowledge.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What does gender have to do with it? Do men not have skin?

You should probably use a moisturizer at least. And spf isn't a bad idea if you will be outside.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Really? I'm in my 20s, and pretty much everyone I know smokes. I think it's just less acceptable to smoke alone or in public.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago

The carcinization of desert mammals

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago

I feel that. I wish I was neurotypical, cis, and mentally well :(

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Doesn't Linux already have a bunch of forks? I'm using the CachyOS kernel, for example

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's a chicken and egg thing, I think. It's interpreted that way because it's so rare.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet this is peak force is measured at the base of the jaw, meaning the teeth at the tip would exert significantly lower force. So it might be possible to escape a small alligator, I'm not sure.

view more: ‹ prev next ›