DelightfullyDivisive

joined 1 year ago
[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Exactly. Some of them may actually be cops. They always get some number of facists.

I'll second PARA. It works well for me. I used it as an organizing principle in my notes and todo software.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Things that I have found useful:

  • MENDS as a routine, as often as I can remember (meditation, exercise, nature, diet, sleep)
  • Mind mapping to take notes and reorganize / review it often (I use XMind)
  • Keeping searchable notes (I use Joplin, but OneNote and Evernote work too)
  • Using the above as part of an organization system (look up GTD and "building a second brain")
  • Microdosing psilocybin
  • Get your hormone levels checked - if they're outside the normal range, it can exacerbate ADHD

Good luck! It has been a multi-year journey for me, but a successful one.

Use a little salt substitute on your food. It's potassium salt instead of sodium, and contains a lot more of it than those completely worthless pills.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

The general election is two weeks away. What are people voting for in Georgia today?

They could have, but that doesn't mean that Starlink couldn't do a lot more to catch them at it. You're making excuses for a fascist.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are you saying that geolocation of a starlink unit is difficult from the starlink satellite network? That seems unlikely to me.

Starlink has no reason outside sanctions to give a fuck where their payments are coming from

Do you see a moral dimension to this? Keeping technology out of the hands of an aggressor state is an excellent reason. I think that many people feel that because corporate entities behave like criminal organizations (indifferent to anything other than maximizing their own profits) that this is somehow OK. It isn't, and normalizing isn't acceptable either.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was curious about why all of the authors of a study from Oxford University seem to have Chinese names. I didn't find any of their names in a search of Oxford's staff, either.

I have no idea what this means, but maybe the study was actually conducted elsewhere using data from the UK? Maybe there are just a ton of graduate students from China at Oxford in their life sciences program? I'm not insinuating any sinister, it just seems odd and I was trying to understand why.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It takes way less Delta V to push them into solar escape velocity.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Under what circumstances does the first amendment guarantee anonymity?

What makes you think the other commenter wants chip makers to operate in a free market?

 

I found that things became much more pleasant on here when I blocked hexbear. I recently blocked lemmy.ml as well, but I may reverse that if I find that I'm missing too much good content.

I'm open to other ideas on how to mostly avoid people who love conflict or argue in bad faith.

 
 

It's a step forward, but there is still a long way to go for full legalization.

 

Check out Zepbound at lemmy.world.

This is a community for anyone who is using or plans to use Ozempic, Zepbound or any of the other peptide-based obesity/diabetes drugs. Share information, hacks and get support!

 

I haven't found anything calling this crank science, although it does make some rather sweeping claims. One is that dark matter does not exist, and another is that the universe is 27 billion years old.

https://phys.org/news/2024-03-universe-dark.html

 

I have read several articles like this one.

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/james-webb-telescope-confirms-there-is-something-seriously-wrong-with-our-understanding-of-the-universe

They all seem to be saying that there is a "crisis in cosmology", where different measurements can't reconcile what the value of the hubble constant is.

Then I watched this video last night that seems to be saying it's all just tweaking different models.

https://youtu.be/2pux7v9qJ58?si=ux3zBSHR-vvsz9qY

I'm not entirely sure if they're talking about two slightly different things. (Hubble's constant, and the predicted age of the universe.) Or if the "crisis" is really just a misunderstanding, or just clickbait tactics. Any informed opinions on the subject?

 
 
view more: next ›