this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1222 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

72372 readers
3832 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you can, use Firefox.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 237 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Switching away from Chrome is something that is always worth repeating, but just FYI this happened last September and isn't "new". If you're on Chrome and are only just now realizing this, it's been your reality for the last 5 months.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] strawberry@kbin.run 226 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The Federated Learning of Cohorts and now the Topics API are part of a plan to pitch an "alternative" tracking platform, and Google argues that there has to be a tracking alternative—you can't just not be spied on.

lmao what the fuck kind of dystopia are we living in

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'd make the world a better place, but a big company would make slightly less money, therefore it's unthinkable to even attempt it.

See also: vehicle emissions standards

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this means that the internet could have always worked fine without invasive cookies and everything they told us about it being impossible was just a lie.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Cookies serve important purposes for doing things like keeping you signed in as you navigate through multiple pages on a site.

The issue is that most parts of the internet were developed by people more interested in all the cool stuff you could do with it, and not at all concerned about the potential misuse by large multi billion dollar corporations.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Google's utopia is humanity's dystopia.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Did any user in the world want a user-tracking and ad platform baked directly into their browser? Probably not, but this is Google, and they control Chrome, and this probably still won't make people switch to Firefox."

[–] redfox@infosec.pub 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Their idea is that is hides all the user info from advertising companies. Downside is your browser is an ad slot machine.

Which is best?

Tracked or ad machine?

I'm more surprised people aren't talking about the fact that since it's running on the client side, someone would just figure out a way to hack and block all the ads even easier.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This also further consolidates Google's advertising power. Block all their competitors from gathering the information and give them a neutered "topics list". Google still maintains every ability to allow their own products and ad platform to bypass and use the full information.

[–] squid_slime@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

They are an ad company first. But yep now google will be the main advertiser in town

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Because the entire design of it is to mathematically prevent you from having the option to hack or block the ads. THe way to get around it is to... not use chrome.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

It hides user information from companies which aren’t Google. The best is not using anything Chromium based.

Extensions require APIs from the browser to work, and Google is going to nerf the APIs which allow for ad blocking. Extensions don’t have unfettered access to the DOM. FF used to be like that, but Chrome never allowed that.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're thinking about it the wrong way. How does this directly and noticably harm the user experience of the average user of chrome? If it doesn't then there's no incentive for them to switch.

Not everyone knows about this kind of thing or cares. Firefox has to be significantly better in obvious ways and market that to grow their market share.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

WELL I HOPE YOU FUCKS LIKE SOME WEIRD ASS PORN AND SHITPOSTS

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna spin up a Windows VM and see how many porn sites and open chrome sessions i can spawn

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's with Lemmy and reposting really old things?

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is the Internet Explorer of forums.

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it's OP's fault, unless it's a bot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SUPERcrazy3530@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does this only affect Chrome or all Chromium based browsers? Are Brave and Edge going to be implementing this too?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just Chrome in this instance, as it spies for Google. Any anti ad blocking features go though to all chromium based browsers and it is better to switch Firefox. If that browser disappears we won't have a good alternative anymore.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago

It is better to switch to Firefox. But chromium forks can generally do whatever they want, it's just a matter of maintenance burden. e.g. nothing is stopping a Chromium fork like Brave from running a manifest v2 compatible appstore, but it'll cost money to make, maintain, and operate, plus you have less discoverability as an app developer when using a smaller app store.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Just Chrome

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Lemmy pushes hard for Firefox, but Vivaldi has not implemented this and will likely hold out as long as possible on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Duck duck go has become a pretty good viable alternative to google using it full time now.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ve been using it as my main search engine for around a year now. I accidentally used google today to look up “best screwdriver sets” and the results were all ads instead of results with screwdriver set reviews. I put the same thing in DuckDuckGo and immediately got relevant results.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Tomzomodest@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Another beautiful day of ditching chrome for Firefox a long time ago

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago

I used to use the good browser. But then they changed what the good browser was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me.

ITLL HAPPEN TO YOU

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's also already built into Google Play Services. Remember this when they claim a monopoly is good for "security" reasons.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Amazing how Google and Apple differ on so much, but in this respect they are in total agreement...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's getting harder to remain compassionate towards people who keep using chrome.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you serious? You can't be compassionate toward people who use a certain browser? It's probably because they don't understand/know/care. 🤷‍♂️ Educate them.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

next up: every page requires shitty chrome or login with google.

then the big shrug and all continue using chrome, iphone, amazon and the other evils.

if you are using any of the above YOU are the problem.

thoughts and prayers. wasch mich, aber mach mich nicht nass.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only a matter of time when Chromium operating subsystem start to be incompatible with Firefox.

So, all those years creating "web standards" are for nothing, as turned out with too many standards no one is able to implement them, leaving only one existing browser to still operate. We won't even know if websites are compatible with a standard anymore, because Chrome interpretation might me different from any other.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, all those years creating “web standards” are for nothing...

Oh it was for something! It allowed Google to take over using Microsoft's "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" philosophy.

What Google is doing now is exactly what Microsoft did back in the Netscape Navigator / Internet Explorer days.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

eww icky also this article is old

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mozilla is making a great pivot to integrate AI into Firefox. Totally what people want. /s

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... with features like local-only (i.e. privacy-respecting) language translation. Good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TotalSonic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Librewolf project is up to date Firefox core with some hardening and the telemetry going back to Mozilla removed - good stuff.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

I was just thinking about it and I had switched to Firefox back when I left Reddit over the whole API thing and joined Lemmy.

load more comments
view more: next ›