ysjet

joined 2 years ago
[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

She's literally been a major feminist activist and UN ambassador for over a decade.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Trust me, we know. Feel free to hit american companies in their pocketbooks though. It's the only way they'll learn. And maybe they'll fuck off and get out of our government too.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Aww look, now the sealion is moving the goalposts.

We know what you are, go away.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the strawman that ignores context entirely. Nice.

See, if they weren't white, they would have been charged with greater crimes despite only 'attempting' to do this. And you know this.

Fuck off with your sealioning, you damn well know they're right.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Lol, good try, but we know it's the same.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My man, if you slapped something at 32,000 miles per hour, you don't have a hand to cook anymore :P

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

My understanding is that most testers found it's about 4ms better than the switch 1, and the only tester that found it worse refuses to actually outline their methodology, and nobody can reproduce the 30ms+ number.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.

Monitors unboxed just went "yeah it's 30+ms, source: trust me bro"

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So basically, the news here is that the switch 2 screen is better than the switch 1 at 17ms vs 21ms, except for one singular tester that claims 30+, which no other independent tester collaborates... And then they go and compare it to screens that cost multiple times the entire switch's cost... And this is presented as a bad thing?

Are you kidding me rn

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ahhh, ok. Never seen it, I'm afraid.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because oil money, and it's tied to environmentalism.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nope, it's a real thing. Granted, I mostly see it used when a meeting ends 30-40 minutes early.

 

5 Calls will give you your reps, their party (so you can avoid calling any republicans and getting yourself put on a potential retaliation list), multiple methods for contacting each rep (displayed in the order you should consider them), and then a script for what to say for any one of several dozen issues at hand.

Call your reps, and push them to do their jobs!

view more: next ›