Trust me, we know. Feel free to hit american companies in their pocketbooks though. It's the only way they'll learn. And maybe they'll fuck off and get out of our government too.
ysjet
Aww look, now the sealion is moving the goalposts.
We know what you are, go away.
Ah yes, the strawman that ignores context entirely. Nice.
See, if they weren't white, they would have been charged with greater crimes despite only 'attempting' to do this. And you know this.
Fuck off with your sealioning, you damn well know they're right.
Lol, good try, but we know it's the same.
My man, if you slapped something at 32,000 miles per hour, you don't have a hand to cook anymore :P
My understanding is that most testers found it's about 4ms better than the switch 1, and the only tester that found it worse refuses to actually outline their methodology, and nobody can reproduce the 30ms+ number.
Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.
Monitors unboxed just went "yeah it's 30+ms, source: trust me bro"
So basically, the news here is that the switch 2 screen is better than the switch 1 at 17ms vs 21ms, except for one singular tester that claims 30+, which no other independent tester collaborates... And then they go and compare it to screens that cost multiple times the entire switch's cost... And this is presented as a bad thing?
Are you kidding me rn
Ahhh, ok. Never seen it, I'm afraid.
Because oil money, and it's tied to environmentalism.
Nope, it's a real thing. Granted, I mostly see it used when a meeting ends 30-40 minutes early.
She's literally been a major feminist activist and UN ambassador for over a decade.