this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
504 points (99.8% liked)

politics

22641 readers
4613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A GOP-led procedural vote in the House failed after nine Republicans joined Democrats, halting legislative action for the week.

The vote's collapse blocked Republican efforts to pass the No Rogue Rulings Act, aimed at limiting federal judges’ power, and the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote.

The failed rule also sought to derail a bipartisan resolution allowing proxy voting for new parents, led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna.

With the rule defeated, Speaker Mike Johnson canceled all remaining votes until Monday evening, stalling key GOP priorities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 166 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Republican women in our house of Representatives are demanding maternity remote work for themselves. Twelve weeks. That's twelve weeks more than Americans get.

So they'll have time off with their babies. And still get paid. With their free taxpayer funded Healthcare.

Leading the charge was Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla. She was in the freedom caucus, who opposed giving special treatment to women. But Luna had a baby last year. So guess what's suddenly important to her now? She left the freedom caucus.

I fucking LOATHE Republicans. Their brains are broken that they can't imagine something unless it happens to them. They're too stupid or selfish, I'm not sure which. Pretty sure it's stupid.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Definitely stupid. Also selfish, but definitely stupid. I've met too many of these god damn people that just cannot fathom seeing the world from the perspective of anyone else.

[–] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree they are selfish but I'd be cautious assuming they are stupid. That is how we got where we are today. We assumed their stupidity and incompetence would be their undoing but the past 9 years have shown us that assumption was wrong.

It's not that they are stupid they just don't care about being a hypocrite.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I guess I should say emotionally stupid. That doesn't necessarily make them inherently stupid, but they just have a complete utter absence of emotional intelligence and do not care.

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

12 weeks is so crazy little. i got 8 weeks, as a father, and my wife took 78 weeks (at a reduced weekly pay)

[–] prongs@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Babies have to learn to be self sufficient as early as 12 weeks so that they can enter the workforce and learn to be oppressed sooner.

They yearn for the mines, not the moms

load more comments (1 replies)

Twelve weeks. That's twelve weeks more than Americans get.

Paid is the important additional criteria in your statement. Fmla keeps your insurance running and guarantees 12 weeks off work unpaid for maternity leave(for people working more than the pittance that is 1250 hours a year)


something many Americans cannot afford.

[–] sowitzer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Congress gets the same health benefits as all federal workers. It isn’t free. https://www.cbo.gov/about/careers/benefits

I’m all for bashing congress, but continuing to throw out untrue “facts” learned from internet comments that were never verified might get more attention, but can make others disregard the rest of your statement.

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

that being said i am 100% in favor of new parents getting to at least work remotely in the House

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A GOP-led procedural vote in the House failed after nine Republicans joined Democrats

Pog

I'm gonna start keeping track of who from each party is actually resisting

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This wasn't a partisan issue. It was literally just letting new mothers vote.

I'll call it resisting if the American people have consequences

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

resolution to allow members who give birth or lawmakers whose spouses give birth to have another member vote for them for 12 weeks.

Well that sounds like a stupid proposition. The "other member" could simply use their second vote to vote however they want in absence of the lawmaker with a newborn. Surely there are better ways to handle this.

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Perhaps there could be some a voting form of sorts, which gets mailed to e.g. new mothers. And they have something like a couple of weeks to fill out how they wish to vote, I suppose they could sign it too if need be, then return it in a security envelope of sorts to the voting place.
I know it may sound like madness, but this form of voting-by-letters-in-the-trusted-care-of-USPS may sound a bit futuristic; but I am confident society can pull it off.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those voter ID laws would have been the death knell for democracy, as they were in the Jim Crow South. Stopping them had incalculable benefits for the American people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

probably hoping this a distraction from all the elon-wisconsin trumps shenangigan blows over.

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Nah, he's throwing a temper tantrum because of the nine that didn't fall in line.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 133 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not sure if this is Johnson acting immature and throwing a tantrum because the GOP couldn't get their way, or if he's buying time to make sure they can get the nine Republicans into line before trying again.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Definitely the latter. They don't want to risk anyone else defecting in the meantime after repeated failures that make them look bad, so they're looking for some other way to coerce the votes.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago

Mob style, bribery and physical threats to your family and loved ones.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's just a rule they can't vote on it until Monday. Which was the original schedule until Anna Paulina Luna used the arcane rule to move it up. She probably did that because nobody comes to work on Mondays and she didn't think they'd have the votes. She worked with a Democrat to create the bill and had a baby just a few months after being elected. She left the Freedom Caucus over it.

The 9 Rs didn't like being pushed around.

Or, just maybe, some of them (plus her) are the ones that some of the more quietly persuasive Democrats need to be talking to off the floor....

Edit: Either way, I'm happy for anything that messes with the GOP pushing through their hate agenda. Delay, Deny, Defend us against tyranny!

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hold on.. I'm having trouble unpacking this. Can you explain the math here? Did I read that this is all the result of internal GOP drama because someone had a baby?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a bit of "strange bedfellows" involved here. Two women, one D and one R, realized they and anyone like them could lose their opportunities to vote on legislation (ie do their job) if childbirth or neonatal complications kept them away from the Capitol Building. So they sponsored this bill.

Democrats like it because it makes the job fairer to women. I presume some of the Republicans feel it fits their pro-birth agenda, and helps against women's tendency to vote more left than their spouses.

They may also like the part that Johnson hates, which is that it opens a door to further proxy voting. Which he says is bad because legislators need to be in the same building interacting with each other, (which we can all see isn't doing shit for bipartisanship) but mostly that rule is used for partisan gamesmanship, timing votes according to who will be present. He doesn't want to have to learn how to work with a change in the rules.

Three bills got linked together as part of his shenanigans, so now all three are stuck until at least Monday.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now accepting bets on when Trump dissolves Congress.

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

You mean, when Musk dissolves congress?

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wonder when they'll start floating the idea of martial law.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago

Their primary objective of Martial Law will be to suspend the mid-term elections, and they don't want to show that hand too early, and give it time to get through the courts.

So they'll wait until next summer, when the protests have grown huge, and the enraged citizens are on the warpath. They'll send in their RedHats to instigate violence, then send in armed authorities to quell the street violence with ferocious armed violence. That will be met with more violence, and the streets of American cities will look like Hong Kong.

Then they will use that as justification for Martial Law, and suspend elections until peace is restored, and since HitlerPig controls the peace that will never happen.

Next summer is going to be wild.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is that Eminem if he became a cop instead of a rapper?

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a Tekken character.

You're thinking of Martian law.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, the recommendation for martial law is supposed to come out by April 20th.

[–] pacology@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It will be a nice birthday present

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

It is also the birthday of president musk's idol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Geez I wish I could just stop working when I don't agree wit my coworkers.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago

I quit a job after a coworker started yelling and screaming because I was told to go help them. I said I couldn't work with them anymore.My manager said, "well you can't pick who you work with." So I turned in my shit ans left the next day. You actually can pick who you work with.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

They'll do something when it's about their own ability to work remotely. Otherwise, they do not give a fuck.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

Good. Let's be honest here... When Republicans stop working America benefits.

load more comments
view more: next ›