Feathercrown

It makes them feel good and devalues the quality of discussion. Benefits them, harms others.

ANY doubt of the judge's impartiality in this case should result in them being replaced immediately, let alone blatant corruption like this.

And yet, that is its default definition regardless of operating system.

Defined by what? When does the os, rather than a program, determine how many spaces a tab is?

There aren't two boxes. There are two groups of opinions, and the one you're closest to is the one that you vote for. Your affiliation probably won't match the majority of a party for every possible issue, but that's fine, because there's no need to put anyone in boxes. Your party is, for all intents and purposes, the one which you most agree with. I don't know where you think I'm splitting hairs, unless you just mean that people close to 50/50 on party agreement can't be neatly categorized, which should be obvious.

Single-issue voters don't have my respect. Mostly because I don't believe they actually have a single issue; I believe many would choose a new issue if theirs became obsolete, that many are hypocritical in their views on their own single issue or related issues, and most importantly, that valuing one issue over the dozens of other problems that they should be caring about is immoral.

I think that's more of a case of mislabelling than of the parties being close together. If 90% of the party disagrees with you, you're not really representative of the party's beliefs.

Republicans are not center right

Are smokers "minding their own biz" when I walk through a cloud of nasty carcinogens they they made?

God I hate people who use github comments for their own benefit. "Just fork it bro" is never helpful.

You will never know enlightenment, because you cannot conceive of being wrong.

I don't like how this phrase has been weaponized but yeah nobody can deny that this is what's happening here

Nowhere; it's bad for you and others