this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
160 points (95.5% liked)

Facepalm

3011 readers
85 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xep@fedia.io 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no way this isn't satire.

[–] Yggnar@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Your faith in humanity is way too high.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)

hey guys look at this totally original meme I am posting

[–] alphadont@lemmy.ca 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GallowBoob claims another victim.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Holy shit I haven’t heard that name in a long time

[–] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No I am ~~Unidan~~ Gallowboob!

[–] teft@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a meme."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies memes, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws memes. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "meme family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Memidae, which includes things from rickrolls to copypastas to shitposts.

So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a meme is because random people "call the funny ones memes?" Let's get astroturfs and reposts in there, then, too.

Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the meme family. But that's not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a meme, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the meme family memes, which means you'd call astroturfs, reposts, and other OC memes, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is why they made nfts. OP fucked up and didn’t protect himself through the power of block chain.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Shift-command-4 has entered the chat.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think they understand what a meme is.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Most don't know shit about copyright either, cause OOP has a case, assuming they used their own meme template.
The entire meme economy is technically one big copyright violation, which just shows how utterly broken current copyright law is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jwo5qc78QU

[–] palebluethought@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A case for what damages? Reddit karma?

[–] infectoid@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

And the judge has ruled in favour of the plaintiff and awards them the amount of 20,000 karmas in damages.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Isn't there an exception for transformative works, like adding captions?

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's always a relevant Tom Scott video

[–] notarobot@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not anymore. Didn't he retire?

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Yes, but most of his videos are timeless.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Karma is a bitch! I'm so glad Lemmy ditched the total user score, I was way too much stressed about it when using that site.

[–] MemmingenFan923@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Theoretically you can calculate the total karma by yourself since the karma isn't hidden.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

You could even create a global high score.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

True, but you need to go out of your ways to do it instead of see it on each page. Also the count is a bit different in each server instance, as federation is not completely accurate.

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hello, I'm on a throwaway account because I already confronted the reposter on my main account.

Backstory: I recently posted a meme, and it only got 50 upvotes. Someone stole my meme and and got over 20,000 upvotes.

I was literally heartbroken and cried. I told the reposter to give me credit, but he made fun of me instead. I know suing someone over a meme sounds silly, but it's not about the meme. it's about justice. I'm planning on contacting a lawyer, but I wanna get advice here to see what I can do. So what can I do? I wanna take this to a civil court. Will a judge take it?

+ ratio

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago

"I award judgment to you in the amount of eleventy-nillion fake internet points."

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

I mean, technically you can sue anyone for anything..... Whether it's going to be successful or not is a different question.

Is there a sovcit sub the OP can be referred to?
I'm sure they will find all the advice they'll ever need.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

OP didn't have to say "literally". We already knew he was the type to sue over hurt feelings.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

You're all are laughing now, but when that meme hits critical and is spread to every phone in the northern hemisphere, we'll need to find patient 0P for the cure.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can understand the frustration but can't they just... Call them out in the thread? Link their original post?

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

Not if the reposter blocks them

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Donate $100,000 to Trump and he will levy a 25% tariff on his ass.

Honestly, I would watch this show. Let's have an 80-year-old judge preside over the meme theft suit.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Karmacourt always looked like a lot of effort without much entertainment. I think it was put together by those kids that read and reenacted Roberts Rules of Order for fun. Aka the student government.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why is this funny? Thinking on it, shouldn't copying someone's created content be actionable on the social platform at the very least?

We are getting so used to people stealing content that it is just become the rule of the land, but imagine creating a painting or writing a book then someone copies it and sells it claiming it's theirs.

I view memes as more fun when they're lower stakes, like retelling a joke someone else told you.

Thinking of it from a copyright infringement angle just feels so grimy and commercialized to me.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

My perspective is that youre just way too used to the absolute insanity that is copyright and IP in the current world