this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
195 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22058 readers
3584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick urged Fox News viewers to buy Tesla stock, praising Elon Musk as "the best person to bet on."

Speaking on Jesse Watters Primetime, Lutnick defended Musk amid vandalism protests linked to Musk's support for far-right politics and federal budget cuts.

He claimed Musk’s innovations, including robots and space technology, make Tesla stock undervalued.

Lutnick’s comments sparked criticism over potential legal and ethical conflicts, as government officials promoting individual stocks may violate ethics regulations.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 64 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Overall it’s a smart move. It’s like how scammers insert typos into their emails to filter out anyone with brain cells.

They have a small, captive audience of low intelligence and low information viewers. They’re the perfect vulnerable people to separate from their money.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 13 points 18 hours ago

Large captive audience of low intelligence…

[–] mbrailer@mstdn.social 46 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

@MicroWave Conservatives have repeatedly said that government should not be picking winners and losers. What changed?

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

When the loser is a conservative, then they're supposed to be a winner. When the loser isn't conservative, they're not supposed to get a helping hand because they aren't human.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 17 hours ago

It's like the "there must be outgroups for the law to bind but not protect, and in-groups for the law to protect but not bind" thing.

Conservatism has always been about promoting the in-group. It's not about rules or fairness or consistency. Just the in-group.

It's a shitty world view.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 15 points 20 hours ago

The wind blew in a different direction.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 3 points 15 hours ago

Rules for thee, none for me... the unofficial official republican slogan.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

What changed is that conservatives are in charge now, the old rules only applied when they don't get to pick the winners and losers.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 49 points 21 hours ago

Go for it. Lose your retirements, losers.

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If Fox is trying to make their viewers go broke, might as well tell them to buy $TRUMP coin, too.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh it’s coming, this will be their big plan to “save” social security. Back it with shitcoins like $TRUMP or $DOGE

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

He claimed Musk’s innovations, including robots and space technology, make Tesla stock undervalued.

The fuck does that have to do with Tesla?

Shaq was amazing at rebounds, doesn't mean I want a cartoon general as my car insurance because Shaq is also involved with that company...

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not even his inventions. Like a modern day Edison, he just takes credit for other people's work.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Musk is a great guy!

Just look at all the businesses he's bought from founders, taken all the credit, and ran into the ground!

/s

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Undervalued? I think even Tesla investors know it's a bubble. One glance at Toyota and Honda stocks make that abundantly clear.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Jon Oliver had a segment; Tesla lost more value than like 20 other real car companies in 2025...

It's a meme stock that sometimes makes cars. The price was based on people thinking the numbers would always go up.

That usually ends bad

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

Man, Musk’s innovations are amazing. Tesla’s service department makes so much money

Trunk leaks water because it was designed by people who don’t see rain?

Time to fix!

Slam your door too hard and the door card falls off?

Time to fix!

Monitor that controls most things in your car starts to fail because it was the biggest but not checked to be automotive grade?

Time to fix!

Your gas pedal gets stuck to the trim and makes your car speedy?

Time to fix!

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Dude I fuckin reverse snorted and accidentally blew a bunch of snot into my mustache because of this.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"DEMOCRATS WANT TO DESTROY MUSK"...poor dems get blamed for everything.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

Sounds like praise to me, but they're not even doing it! :/

[–] mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Short TSLA.

Puts at 170 will pay out very nicely.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Whats your expiry? This volatility is making puts so damn expensive

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago

I was personally looking at May, but that's pretty damn expensive for me.

I'm thinking June, but I'm also not going to go to 170.

[–] mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

As he was saying it they showed the Vegas video of Teslas on fire. Delicious irony.

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

He is speaking to the youths: TSLA is 🔥fr

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Just like Trump Coin and Melania Coin! GET THOSE POORS TO REALLY DIG DEEP!!!!

These assholes are fucking disgusting. These idiots hosts are even worse. Why don't y'all go and buy five Tesla's, huh? Who is the fuck is crying for Elon Musk getting his wallet absolutely fucked?

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

Nutlick never fails to deliver illegal information.

[–] NOT_RICK_SANCHEZ@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

If this seems highly unusual it’s because it is. They are getting desperate now and this move is all the proof you need, I hope they put every red cent from their social security money on Tesla stock lol

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 19 hours ago

"buy tesla stock"

Which means buy Tesla Puts :)

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I also urge conservatives to buy Tesla stock, but definitely for different reasons.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 20 hours ago

They might want to consider this article in the Financial Times first: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/32620139

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I wouldn't bet a dollar on Musk, but I am tempted to buy stock while it's on a 50% discount in preparation for when they (hopefully) oust him and the company takes back off and becomes a beloved car manufacturer (heavy hoping).

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 3 hours ago

I mean it's still insanely overvalued. It's a car manufacturer priced like a tech giant - the stock is so high because of hopes they'll be the ones to crack true full self driving, human level robotics, or produce batteries at some insane scale

They're so behind and have lost so much trust on all those fronts that they'd need to actually do it for the stock to pay out. But they're no longer the best cheap electric cars, their self driving features are some of the worst because they went all in on visual only, and there's many companies worlds ahead of them on robotics automation. Even their safety is so bad countries easily banned them once musk's reputation tanked

Plus, musk would have to divest or have his shares called in to fully separate him... Either of which means the stock tanks or already has tanked

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is that he still owns a huge chunk of the stock. Unless he sells it all for some reason (or dies (naturally), now that would be something), there is no way to hope that Tesla succeeds independent of Elon because he directly profits from their success.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Well obviously I'm also planning on him dying. I thought that was a given. No way this man lives to see the end up the decade.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not going back up again. Not anytime soon. Wait till it's penny stock.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean I don't actually have a spare few hundred bucks lying around so if I wasn't just trying to make fun of Elon for losing half his car money then I would have to wait anyway.

[–] MessagingMatters@mstdn.social 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

Smells less like desperation and more like not missing out on an opportunity to grift.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Terrible idea from Jesse.