this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
680 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
5383 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 189 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The year is 1997. A young boy is about to watch a porn video for the first time on a grainy VHS tape. An older version of himself from the far off year of 2025 appears.

Me: "You know, in the future, you'll make your own porn videos."

90s me: "Wow, you mean I'll get to have lots of hot sex!?!?"

Me: "Ha! No. So Nvidia will release this system called CUDA..."

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I thought this was going to go Watchmen for a moment. Like...

It is 1997, I am a young boy, I am jerking off to a grainy porno playing over stolen cinemax.

It is 2007, i am in my dorm, i am jerking off to a forum thread full of hi-res porno.

It is 2027, i am jerking off to an ai porno stream that mutates to my desires in real time. I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Oops the stream hallucinated and mutated into a horror show with women with nipples that are mouths and dicks with eyeballs.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 15 points 1 month ago

I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

Did I stutter?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 170 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It's super funny to me that they named it "WanX" haha

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 49 points 1 month ago

Kudos to the English speaking guy on the team who pushed that under the radar. That has got to be intentional.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

it fulfilled its name mandate %100

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 164 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I am going to make this statement openly on the Internet. Feel free to make AI generated porn of me as long as it involves adults. Nobody is going to believe that a video of me getting railed by a pink wolf furry is real. Everyone knows I'm not that lucky.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 month ago

Fortunately, most of my family is so tech illiterate that even if a real video got out, I could just tell them it's a deepfake and they'd probably believe me.

[–] ghost9@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Does the wolf need to be an adult in human years or dog years?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I understand the convention is that the wolf is really a thousand-year-old polymorphed dragon, regardless of physical appearance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (57 children)

First off, I am sex positive, pro porn, pro sex work, and don't believe sex work should be shameful, and that there is nothing wrong about buying intimacy from a willing seller.

That said. The current state of the industry and the conditions for many professionals raises serious ethical issues. Coercion being the biggest issue.

I am torn about AI porn. On one hand it can produce porn without suffering, on the other hand it might be trained on other peoples work and take peoples jobs.

I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children)

I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.

I've been thinking about this recently too, and I have similar feelings.

I'm just gonna come out and say it without beating around the bush: what is the law's position on AI-generated child porn?

More importantly, what should it be?

It goes without saying that the training data absolutely should not contain CP, for reasons that should be obvious to anybody. But what if it wasn't?

If we're basing the law on pragmatism rather than emotional reaction, I guess it comes down to whether creating this material would embolden paedophiles and lead to more predatory behaviour (i.e. increasing demand), or whether it would satisfy their desires enough to cause a substantial drop in predatory behaviour (I.e. lowering demand).

And to know that, we'd need extensive and extremely controversial studies. Beyond that, even in the event allowing this stuff to be generated is an overall positive (and I don't know whether it would or won't), will many politicians actually call for this stuff to be allowed? Seems like the kind of thing that could ruin a political career. Nobody's touching that with a ten foot pole.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (56 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 85 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Oh my God! That's disgusting! AI porn online!? Where!? Where do they post those!? There's so many of them, though. Which one?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fucking disgusting unethical shit. Tell me where to find it so I can avoid it pls.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Good.

Hot take but I think AI porn will be revolutionary and mostly in a good way. Sex industry is extremely wasteful and inefficient use of our collective time that also often involves a lot of abuse and dark business practices. It's just somehow taboo to even mention this.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Sometimes you come across a video and you are like 'oh this. I need more of THIS.'
And then you start tailoring searches to try find more of the same but you keep getting generic or repeated results because the lack of well described/defined content overuse of video TAGs (obviously to try get more views with a large net rather than being specific).
But would i watch AI content if i could feed it a description of what i want? Hell yeah!

I mean there are only so many videos of girls giving a blowjob while he eats tacos and watches old Black & White documentaries about the advancements of mechanical production processes.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hate it when you find a good video, it does the job really well, so a few days later you're like, yeah let's watch that one again, you type in every single description you can about the video and find everything else but the video you want and they're barely anywhere near as good.

Hell I'd take an AI porn search engine for now, let me describe in detail what the video I'm looking for is so I can finally see it again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yes, but will also hurt the very workers' bottom line, and with some clever workarounds, it'll be used to fabricate defamatory material other methods were not good at.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 48 points 1 month ago

Even Onlyfans girls and boys will lose their jobs because of AI :(

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What's the URL for this generator so I can avoid it?

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 38 points 1 month ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (36 children)

Who are the girls in the picture? We can do this, team. Left to right, starting at the top.

  1. Gwen Stacy

  2. ??

  3. bayonet

  4. little mermaid

  5. ??

  6. ??

  7. Jinx

  8. ??

  9. Rei

  10. Rei

  11. lol Rei

  12. Aerith

[–] critical@reddthat.com 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

My friend wants to know if it can generate VR videos too?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

It's really called Wanx?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

this is gonna take rule 34 to a whole another level

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you build it, they will porn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (24 children)

ai porn is dull. ill take poorly drawn heinous fetish art over your ai generated slop.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's disgusting! Where?

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago
[–] Graphine@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Finally, my dream of making black gay porn is realized

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

It’s time like this that I think, ahhh, the Internet never truly changed :D

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

Atleast don't censor the photos so for educational purposes only we can collectively judge if this AI art is indeed worth a damn.

[–] Sans_Seraph@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

What I find incredible is that they named this thing WanX, which can alternatively be pronounced Wanks. Nominative Determinism at its finest

load more comments
view more: next ›