Assuming he has one before he died.
Ulrich
They could. Or Trump could fold tomorrow. No one knows. I don't even think Trump knows.
It does but that's beside the point. We're discussing a hypothetical future.
Yes that's why I linked to the article so you could see how you were incorrect.
This is just 12 different kinds of incorrect.
Think of how much diak space YouTube is using
Disk space will be the least of your concerns when running a service like YT.
If everyone can't upload videos it we'll never replace YouTube.
- Everyone CAN upload videos to their own instance.
- It doesn't have to replace YouTube. It can exist alongside it as a competitor.
There is already a plug-in that supports that, along with Stripe integration.
100 subscriber is NBD. Let's talk when you have thousands or even millions of active users. At some point you're going to hit a wall if you were to hypothetically scale up. Costs of service would need to be covered somehow.
The sustainability argument stems from technological constraints. YouTube as a company has no problem sustaining millions of dollars in server infrastructure to serve media. Most self-hosters wouldn't be able to do that without significant income.
I don't agree with this perspective but also don't know enough about server infrastructure or video streaming to argue against it.
This is a great name...
I mean it'll work but you'll have significantly longer loading times.
There is no doubt. Sony is actually a great example because they were the ones who tried to remove purchases from Discovery. They faced zero legal consequences. There wasn't even any discussion of legal consequences because it's perfectly legal. Ultimately Sony worked it out with Discovery to restore those purchases but they did not do that out of legality or out of kindness. They did it for their reputation. If Sony starts removing your streaming purchases, the same purchases you can make any a dozen other platforms, are you going to continue purchasing from them? Hail nah.
Concord was a bit different in that the content was only available for ~2 weeks so I'd imagine that would fall into some sort of legal grey area and they'd end up being sued or worse. As of yet, I don't think "how long must 'purchases' be available?" has been tested in court.
There's no "solidifying" anything with this guy. His reign is based on his whims and emotions.