this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
251 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to the polls, both Biden and Trump will inevitably be nominated but neither Biden nor Trump can win.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How Taylor Swift or Elvis become President

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] arensb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Uh-huh-huh! Thank you, thank you very much.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I looked forward to seeing the White House (Taylor's Version).

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would 100% prefer TayTay to Biden or trump...

Plus, it would really piss off all the "moderate" Dems because they refuse to admit Clinton couldnt win because of anything besides her gender.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am most assuredly HRCs biggest fan on this entire site, and she lost because her name was dragged through the mud for over a decade before 2016. People still say "Benghazi" as if they know or care about what Benghazi is.

Her sex had nothing to do with it.

It’s funny the right is getting pissed about smearing Trump’s name, but he’s the one who has and they pioneered it with Hillary.

Same with cancel culture but boycotting target or bud light is okay.

I’m starting to think they are hypocrites.

[–] mdurell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why the downvotes? Is it the Taylor haters, the Clinton haters, or the women haters?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know many people these days who will ever talk favorably about a politician, because inevitably you'll look like an idiot for it. But we'll still vote for the guy.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You act like that's the voters fault....

Not wanting either candidate but still voting for the lesser evil is basically our entire political system.

And it's the result of letting two "private parties" dominate our political landscape. We can't elect who we want, we can only pick between two options that both side with corporate profits over citizens the vast majority of the time.

And both parties love pointing out how primaries really don't matter. They can run anyone they want in the general and we just have to deal with it.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely 0 Republican leaders even like Trump. Your vote absolutely matters lol

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not anyone's 'fault'. I'm just saying people have learned that even the politician you like the most will do something you and your social circle won't approve of and people are aware of that more than ever because social media leaves a record behind now.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m just saying people have learned that even the politician you like the most will do something you and your social circle won’t approve of and people are aware of that more than ever because social media leaves a record behind now.

I mean Bernie and AOC are two examples that leap to mind to disprove your opinion

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bernie Sanders did not vote on an amendment to the Patriot Act that would have forbidden the government from secretly collecting information about internet browsing and search history data without a warrant. The amendment failed by one vote, and Sanders was one of four senators who did not vote on it.

He also is a supporter of the F-35 program, which has a price tag of 1 trillion dollars.

AOC is still new, and the day will come when she has to do something unpopular for the sake of her political career or some longer term goal.

All I'm saying is, don't put people on pedestals.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bernie Sanders did not vote on an amendment to the Patriot Act

Can you be specific?

https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-votes-against-patriot-act-extension/

“I voted against extending the Patriot Act today for the same reason I voted against enacting it in 2001: it gives the government far too much power to spy on innocent United States citizens and provides for very little oversight or disclosure. While we must aggressively pursue international terrorists and all of those who would do us harm, we must do it in a way that protects the Constitution and the civil liberties which make us proud to be Americans.”

That's the only result I'm seeing.... Maybe if you could give me the year if you can't find an article?

And the F35 stuff seems to be he got a base and manufacturing in Vermont.... That was going to some east coast state, you're making it sound like he pushed for the F35 to exist in the first place...

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

The outcome is especially frustrating since four senators didn’t vote on the amendment at all, and at least one would have voted yes. Lamar Alexander couldn’t vote because he’s quarantined. Two others — Ben Sasse and Bernie Sanders — didn’t respond to request for comment on where they were during the vote.

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/13/21257481/wyden-freedom-patriot-act-amendment-mcconnell

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's because someone will get into power regardless of whether you vote or not and it's better to vote for the lesser of two evils than the greater. Yes, it is important to push for better candidates, but when it comes to Election Day, you can't really say "Well, it's A or B, but I really want C."

Also, while both political parties have their faults, this is by no means "Both Sides Are Equally Awful." I like using a taxi analogy. You're on 8th Street and want to go to 2nd Street. Before you are two taxis: A Blue Taxi and the Red Taxi. Neither taxi will take you to 2nd Street. The Blue one will take you to 4th Street. The Red one will take you in the opposite direction, to 20th Street, before driving you off a cliff.

As I said before, not choosing isn't an option as then others will decide which taxi you go into. Therefore you need to choose which cab to go into. Now, neither is ideal, but it's a lot easier to go from 4th Street to your original destination than from the bottom of a cliff near 20th Street. Therefore, the Blue one is the better pick even if it's not a perfect choice.