this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
902 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden will travel to Michigan on Tuesday to join United Auto Workers on the picket line in one of the most extraordinary displays of support a president has ever taken in the middle of a labor dispute.

Biden's trip comes after United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain invited Biden to the picket line in remarks Friday as the UAW ratchets up its strike against the nation's three largest automakers.

"Tuesday, I’ll go to Michigan to join the picket line and stand in solidarity with the men and women of UAW as they fight for a fair share of the value they helped create," Biden said in a statement. "It’s time for a win-win agreement that keeps American auto manufacturing thriving with well-paid UAW jobs."

Further details about Biden's trip, including which striking site he will visit, remain unclear.

Former President Donald Trump, the frontrunner to capture the 2024 Republican nomination, has said he plans to meet with striking auto workers in the Detroit area Wednesday in a push to court rank-and-file union members and other blue-collar workers for his 2024 run.

Biden faced pressure from progressives to join UAW workers on the picket line after Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Sen. Bernie Sanders and others each traveled to striking sites this week.

For the first time Friday, Fain publicly invited Biden to the picket line.

"We invite and encourage everyone who supports our cause to join us on the picket line − from our friends and families, all the way up to the president of the United States," Fain said.

Biden faces a political tightrope with the UAW strike. He has decades of close ties with organized labor and said he wants to be known as the "most pro-union president" in U.S history. But Biden also wants to avoid national economic repercussions that could result from a prolonged strike.

Biden has endorsed UAW's demands for higher pay, saying last week that "record corporate profits, which they have, should be shared by record contracts for the UAW." But at the request of the UAW, Biden has stayed out of negotiations with Ford Motor Co., General Motors and Stellantis.

Fain extended the invitation after announcing plans to expand UAW's strike to 38 new sites across 20 states. He said the union has made good progress with Ford Motor Co. this week, but General Motors and Stellantis "will need some pushing."

White House press secretary Jean-Pierre said the White House "will do everything that we possibly can to help in any way that the parties would like us to."

A White House team led by Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su and White House adviser Gene Sperling was originally scheduled to visit Detroit this week. But the trip was scrapped after UAW's leadership made it clear they did not want help at the negotiating table.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 208 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As a Democrat who voted for Biden because he didn't want to see fascism, but was very sore about doing so because Biden is a milquetoast moderate at best...

This is sick. Props.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's been a lot more progressive in his policies than I think people thought he'd be. He's not flashy about it though, so people tend to only hear the complaining that comes from much louder people

[–] aski3252@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just remember, this isn't Biden having a change of mind necessarily, this is more about Biden answering to pressure. The reason why Biden behaves like this is mostly because the UAW has witheld their endorsment for him, saying that "Biden has to pick a side, either the working class, or the billionaires", that "he has to earn his endorsment" and that "they expect actions, not just words".

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although also to be fair, there's a long line of democratic politicians NOT bowing to progressive pressure (presumably over their donors). So this is a massive improvement.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

If he's willing to concede that very reasonable point and fight for the UAW, I think he'll earn it.

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did we get buttery emailed with misinformation?

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 3 points 1 year ago

Nah, we just got Hunter Biden dick pics on the House floor.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might actually vote for him if he does this

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Otherwise what, you're voting for Trump?

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He sold out the rail unions not even a year ago

[–] protist@mander.xyz 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He ended up getting them what they wanted just a couple months later. Check out the top comment threads here

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He got them some sick days. A far cry from having their demands met. Particularly in the aspects concerning safety

[–] protist@mander.xyz 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Copying my response to the other guy here too:

Safety is absolutely a serious concern, but can you show me some sources where safety was a sticking point leading up to the strike vote? The union literature from the time is very focused on sick leave

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No he didn't, one of their largest complaints was safety. Democrats downplayed their strike as 'sick days' so it sounded like their demands were trivial.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Safety is absolutely a serious concern, but can you show me some sources where safety was a sticking point leading up to the strike vote? The union literature from the time is very focused on sick leave

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jatone@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the fact dumbasses here are splitting hairs around sick leave, safety, and insane schedules is absurd. All are serious problems that shouldn't exist.

and it was viscerally demonstrated with multiple train crashes occurring during the period the unions were threatening to strike.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

When someone says that sick days weren't a major strike demand and falsely claim without any evidence that safety was the biggest issue, it isn't splitting hairs to ask for proof. If the distinctions don't matter, then makes no sense to complain about safety vs sick leave.

Which train crashes are you referring to?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No, their largest complaints were sick days and a brutal scheduling policy. That's what I remember from looking into this at the time, and what I'm finding looking into it now too.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can you show me where getting 7 sick days per year was what the unions were looking for?