VoxAdActa

I did report it. The problem is many of these arguments come clothed in the fabric of politeness.

Yup. And Beehaw is already doing the thing I predicted they'd do back during the Reddit blackouts: They allow polite genocide endorsements but warn/suspend/ban people who tell those people to fuck themselves because we're not "being nice". Shocked Pikachu when Beehaw ends up being no different from shit-just-works.

I was just commenting on that I don’t think that aggression against -lets call them- consevatives, neo-Nazi’s, right wingers, whatver, works or is wanted

I've been nice to them and trying to politely educate them for over 20 years now, since W was in office. I've convinced a grand total of 2, and in the meantime, 30 million worse ones have arisen.

Fuck them. I'm done assuming they only hate me because they're uneducated. They hate me because they get off on hate, and all the education in the fucking world doesn't matter to them. So I treat them like scum, and their arguments like jokes, because they are.

Don't like it? Too bad. Cry more, salty.

You must not be that interested in staying in contact with your family if you're only willing to use one, specific way to do it and simply refuse to use any other method.

I’d be furious with any company if they pulled that sort of shit with a product I owned.

On the other hand, feature parity means that the full potential of the X because everything also has to run on the S. So all the things that the X can do that the S can't will, probably, not be used much, if at all, going forward, just to avoid this kind of hassle.

Great deal for people who bought the S, but sucks shit for people who paid a couple hundred bucks more for the X, for features that simply won't be utilized.

How about texting? Does texting work?

Amazon has become an expensive version of Wish.com.

Maybe use “sucks”?

"Sucks" has homophobic/misogynist roots, though, and they're much more recent than the ableist usage of "lame". Even the 1950's version of "sucks eggs" wasn't actually talking about the things that come from a chicken.

Even the people who seem to be in favor of it all seem to be talking about how they'll write going forward.

With that said, editing older works to fit different contexts isn't new at all. I remember reading my grandmother's collection of Reader's Digest Condensed Books, and cable companies routinely overdub curse words in movies and cut out sex scenes. Different edits for different audiences. It's weird (it's not weird) how we only start getting pissy about it when it comes to editing out slurs and stuff.

I don't think anyone's arguing for completely banning books that use shitty stereotypes and nasty racial language. The "unabridged" versions, much like the "theatrical releases" of movies, aren't being thrown into a giant shredder. If someone wants to read an anti-semetic rant by Dahl, it's out there. But we've never once at any point in the past gave two shits about editing content to make different editions for different people, and I haven't heard an argument about why we should care when it comes to this specific version of the practice.

If North Korea wants us to know something different, they could tell us themselves. Or, even better, let the people talk to foreign journalists without handlers and threats of repercussions.

Otherwise, we're forced to wonder about how weird it is that it seems like every news organization in the world is dead-set on spreading lies about this one, tiny, geopolitically insignificant country (and no, being able to launch toy rockets into the ocean once every couple of years does not make them geopolitically significant). Like, why did the BBC and RFA and Reuters and the AP and Al Jazeera all get together in a dark, smoky room and cook up a conspiracy to defame North Korea, of all countries? Why not, say, Thailand, or Malaysia, or Morocco, or something?

If this is true, then another danger is it (community, server, platform, etc) becomes an echo chamber.

There's a middle ground between being an "echo chamber" and being forced to put up with the same 10 different bad-faith bumper-sticker sealion questions over and over again for all eternity.

I come to Beehaw when I'm just dead-dog tired of having the same arguments over and over again, when I'm sick to death of hearing what the alt-right thinks about any given issue, when I'm just fed up having to defend my identity and my beliefs from crypto-facists who think they're being subtle when they imply I shouldn't exist and wouldn't exist if they had their way.

I know what "the other side" thinks. Dear God, I can't escape hearing what "the other side" thinks, about everything from the international politics of war to beer cans. I'm well aware of the "discussion" they want to have, I've had it eighty thousand times over the course of my life and it's always the same theme and the same tactics lightly reskinned for whatever outrage bait they read about on Facebook last week.

For example, their opinion on "kids getting trans surgery" is exactly the same pile of nonsense as their opinion on "partial-birth abortion" was 25 years ago: "We're going to take an extreme situation, that almost never actually happens precisely because of how extreme it is, that only ever takes place after months or years of agonizing decision-making between parents and entire teams of professionals with advanced degrees and decades of experience, and pretend like it's the primary form of this issue and happens on a whim."

I'm over 40. I've heard it all. I know what their opinions are. Fuck, I know what their opinions will be on shit that hasn't even come up yet, because it never changes. They never shut up about their opinions. So no, I'm not worried about getting into an "echo chamber". I like finally having a little bit of soundproofing between me and the "(allegedly) silent majority".

There is no ethical consumption under this system, and there's absolutely no hope for it.

The only thing we can do is set our own little moral lines so our hands feel a little cleaner, but it's absolutely impossible to exist in this society while also caring about everything awful going on. There's just too much of it. If I gave one dime to every cause that should be important to me (based on how I see myself), I would drain my bank account into the deep negatives. You absolutely must prioritize your time, money, and attention to a few specific things that you absolutely can't sleep at night knowing you've supported.

For example, global warming is totally fucked. There's literally no way to not fuck up and strip away most of the planet's biosphere, even if everyone woke up tomorrow and said "Shit, we have to go 0 carbon right now!" and accomplished it before lunchtime. It's too late. We're just fucked. The best case is we're fucked well after I die, but even that's not looking particularly likely. So there's no point in me moderating my purchases around so-called "environmentally friendly" companies, because there's no such thing and, if there were one, it wouldn't matter.

But LGBTQ people (like me) exist right now, and will continue to exist right up until we trigger the greenhouse gas cascade that turns Earth into Venus, and since I know we only have so much time left here, it's very important to me to not support people who want to make sure LGBTQ people suffer as much as possible in the interim. Fortunately, the organizations that hate gay people are about as subtle as people who do CrossFit, so it's easy to see them and not give them any money. Am I still giving money to crypto-facists who keep their mouths shut about it in public? Probably, but at least I'm kind of rewarding the behavior of "shutting the fuck up".

Meanwhile, I financially oppose WotC's bullfuckery only insofar as it affects me, personally. If One D&D weren't a giant tire fire that grows with every UA playtest release, I'd probably suck it up and buy it. But since they're also trying to shoehorn their virtual tabletop with AI DMs as the exclusive method by which people play their game, like some kind of half-assed MMO, I won't. Not because I can be assed to care about AI or anti-consumer practices, but because it's obnoxious to me and not fun to me and costs me money for shit I won't enjoy as much. I simply don't have the energy to care about WotC's happy relationship with the Pinkertons, if for no other reason than literally every major company in the world also pays the Pinkertons to do fucky shit all over the globe, and if I care about one company doing it, I have to care about all the other companies openly doing the same thing, and then I'd have to, like, start making my own soap and stuff. Which I just don't have the energy to do.

What it ultimately comes down to is this: honor is an expensive luxury that the vast majority of us simply cannot afford. Buy what you need to survive, spend the extra on whatever bread and circuses allow you to cope with the impending doom of society, and prioritize your moral focus on only a few things that loom the biggest in your mind, the ones that produce the largest amount of shame and guilt for supporting.

Everything is going to produce some amount of guilt, because it's all fucked. You just have to learn to set a guilt-filter in your brain, so guilt below a certain threshold doesn't register anymore. There's literally nothing to be done about it: Even death can't absolve us of supporting oppression and environmental destruction. After you die, someone's going to give shady religious conmen money from your deceased wallet to dig up a big rock, scribble some words on it, put you in an unnecessary coffin, bury you with heavy diesel equipment, tell lies about a bigot-god over your corpse, and then hire someone for minimum wage (at best; more likely, they'll exploit an ethnic minority from another country to do it for pennies) to mow the grass on top of you for the rest of society's existence. Or the other option, which involves exactly as many shady religious conmen, but switches out the long-term grass-mowing for a short, massive burst of fuel and carbon to turn you into ashes, the button for which is probably also being pressed by an oppressed wage slave making a few nickles an hour.

BUT, there's always the possibility that I'm wrong, and that things aren't eternally and irrevokably fucked forever. As a hedge against that, I do two things: I stay employed and budget my money (so I won't be the guy standing naked in a cornfield waiting for whatever apocalypse or second-coming that doesn't happen, thus making myself well and truly fucked), and I vote in every single election I ever hear about, from the Presidential election to the August special election to replace the town dogcatcher.

Right? Where has this article been? They’ve been denying it since the 80s.

Over the entire course of my life, the New York Times has never once been on the right side of an issue the first time. They only come around 5-15 years after the obvious public sea change. Same with the Washington Post.