Teknevra

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
0
Draco and Harry (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Teknevra to c/drarry
-1
Harry and Draco Kiss (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Teknevra to c/drarry
0
Harry and Draco (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Teknevra to c/drarry
0
Harry and Ginny Kiss (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Teknevra to c/harry_and_ginny
0
Ginny and Harry (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Teknevra to c/harry_and_ginny
0
Harry and Ginny (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Teknevra to c/harry_and_ginny
0
Harry and Ginny (literature.cafe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Teknevra to c/harry_and_ginny
 

They could be 2 Quidditch Captains that fight against each other, or something.

 

I don't have much to go off of other than Ginny plays professional quidditch, and I think Harry is an auror, but I'm not sure.

As far as I can remember, they never dated before, and the only specific things I really remember are that when she introduces him to her teammates, she follows it up by saying he's off limits, which both Fred and George give her a pointed look for.

I think there's another scene at a fancy ball or something and she says to him 'you're the most powerful wizard in the world but you're scared of a little dancing'.

I know it's not much to go off of, but if anyone has anything that even somewhat resembles this, I'd really appreciate it.

 

Currently, there's an official PeerTube app, but I have been wondering if they should instead potentially consider an alternative strategy similar to what Lemmy has done.


The proposal is this:

Instead of maintaining an official PeerTube app, what if PeerTube focused instead on being the core system and API, while encouraging third-party developers to create various client apps?

PeerTube could then concentrate on managing and improving the web app, api, etc.


Potential benefits of this approach:

  1. Diverse ecosystem of apps catering to different user preferences
  2. Reduced workload for the core PeerTube team
  3. Increased community involvement and innovation

Potential drawbacks:

  1. Lack of a "standard" mobile experience
  2. Possible fragmentation of the user base
  3. Quality control challenges

What are your thoughts on this idea? Would this approach better serve the PeerTube community and align with the project's goals? How might this impact PeerTube's growth and adoption?

17
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Teknevra to c/peertube@lemmy.ml
 

Suggestion Overview:

PeerTube could potentially host and maintain an official, beginner-friendly server, similar in purpose to Mastodon.Social for Mastodon, or Lemmy.World for Lemmy.

Perhaps call it something like Peertube.Video, or something similar.

This server could function as an easy onboarding point for new users, enabling them to sign up and immediately start exploring videos without the need to understand or manage federated server distinctions.

This server could provide an experience akin to YouTube, where users can browse, search, and watch videos from both the local server and federated servers seamlessly.

By simplifying the experience, this initiative could help make PeerTube more appealing to mainstream audiences and lower the barrier to entry.

__

Features and Benefits

1. Centralized Onboarding for New Users

  • Provide a trusted, official PeerTube instance that's beginner-friendly.
  • Serve as a default place where individuals can sign up without having to research or choose from numerous third-party servers (which can be confusing).

2. Discoverability of Videos Across Federated Servers

  • Users could watch and search for videos from the official server as well as from federated PeerTube instances without needing to understand server distinctions.
  • Implement a streamlined user interface for easy video discovery, resembling YouTube’s intuitive navigation.

3. Support for Technologically Less Savvy Audiences

  • Many users, particularly older individuals or those unfamiliar with decentralized platforms, could benefit from a simplified entry point.
  • Reduce complexity by hiding the technical aspects of federation for these users while still allowing advanced users to explore federated options if desired.

4. Expand PeerTube’s Reach and Adoption

  • By offering an official, centralized entry point, PeerTube could attract more users who otherwise might find the platform intimidating or confusing.
  • This initiative could serve as a showcase for PeerTube, demonstrating the power of federated video sharing to a broader audience.

5. Potential Revenue and Sustainability

  • The official server could offer optional donations or crowdfunding to cover hosting costs, similar to Mastodon.Social.

Addressing Concerns

1. Maintaining Decentralization Values

  • While offering a centralized starting point, the server would remain federated and open, encouraging users to explore other PeerTube instances if they wish.
  • This server would not undermine the decentralized nature of PeerTube but rather serve as a gateway to the broader federated ecosystem.

2. Balancing Resources

  • To reduce strain, the server’s video hosting capacity could focus on curated or user-uploaded content while still federating videos from other servers for a comprehensive experience.
  • Encourage other PeerTube server admins to adopt a similar model to distribute the load.

Closing Thoughts

This initiative could help make PeerTube more accessible while staying true to the values of decentralization. Creating an official, beginner-friendly PeerTube server would not only improve user adoption but also demonstrate PeerTube’s capacity to deliver a federated video-sharing experience that rivals mainstream platforms.

 

Summary

Potential Implementation of a dedicated chat platform for Connect for Lemmy users, either through Discord or Revolt Chat, to foster community engagement, facilitate feature requests, and provide a space for user discussions.


Detailed Description

As a user of Connect for Lemmy, I personally believe that implementing a community chat platform could GREATLY enhance user experience and community engagement.

This idea is inspired by similar implementations in other Lemmy clients, such as Sync for Lemmy's Discord server.


Two potential options for this feature:

  1. Discord Server:

    • Create an official Discord server for Connect for Lemmy users.
    • Advantages: Widely used, feature-rich, and familiar to many users.
  2. Revolt Chat (https://revolt.chat/):

    • Implement an open-source alternative to Discord.
    • Advantages: Aligns with open-source principles, potentially more privacy-focused.

Proposed Functionality

  • Dedicated channels for:
    • Feature requests and suggestions
    • Bug reports
    • General discussion
    • App updates and announcements
  • User roles (e.g., moderators, developers, regular users)
  • Integration with GitHub for issue tracking (if applicable)
  • Polls for community feedback on potential features

Benefits

  1. Improved user engagement and community building
  2. Direct line of communication between users and developers
  3. Centralized platform for feature requests and bug reports
  4. Faster dissemination of updates and announcements
  5. Potential for community-driven development and testing

Implementation Considerations

  • Moderation needs and policies
  • Integration with existing support channels
  • Resource allocation for managing the community platform
  • Privacy and data handling considerations

I personally believe that this feature would SIGNIFICANTLY enhance the Connect for Lemmy experience and strengthen our user community.

view more: ‹ prev next ›