No problem, ordered a culture. Only feedback I have for now is when ordering, it'd be nice to see where local pickup is. I had to go to contact us to guess it's in Kuopio 😅 bit far from Uusimaa
Lumisal
It'd be like if a woman's boobs suddenly got huge from May to August," she added.
I mean, do they get bigger? Has this been studied? Women's research is usually lacking compared to men's.
Nah, I just actually look up claims rather than taking them at face value, and live in Europe.
Nice, even have mead stuff. Will definitely be ordering one of those.
That said, have you considered separating the horticulture side of the business from the alcohol one? Currently it seems hyper specialist on both ends, which is fine for someone like me, but there's probably not many customers like me. Seems like it might be better to separate them.
I definitely understand not wanting to advertise on those platforms. But you do need some way to get a foothold and build reputation. You could for example negotiate direct sponsorships with content creators or locations that do allow alcohol adjacent products to be advertised. Alternatively, you can self promote at least once or twice through something like TikTok and then see if a network effect takes hold.
In Finland tho, and especially if you want to avoid unethical social media, your best chances are actually setting up a physical store. It's more work and more cost, but it gives a very valuable advertising opportunity by people walking by. You could also get a liquor license and offer free samples of stuff you make. Nothing gets Finns attention more than free alcohol usually 😆
And if made in Finland, look into getting that little "made in Finland" flag label if you can afford so.
I know it's an uphill battle setting up a business here, especially with the current government and that VAT increase.
To be fair a lot of kids stores are doing bad in Finland because the birth rate keeps going down. With the current government also doing their best to restrict immigration further it will likely only fall more.
My family that has visited has commented on how few kids there are here, and come to think of it, it's true.
As for the brewing yeast, probably advertising? I've been looking for local brewing yeasts for awhile and have only found some in a Prisma in Jyväskylä.
Wonder why Excel didn't use numbers and treat them like an X and Y axis?
So I decided to look up the article, and see what the defense was.
Here's the article: https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Screen-Shot-2019-09-19-at-16.04.33.jpg
And indeed, it does seem to be a Vetements piece he's wearing. I could not however find the exact outfit, but those are the Georgian designer's signature, in Georgian letters, which can be compared here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demna_(designer)
In looking through some videos from that era, he is wearing multiple articles of clothing from Vetements which tracks. So it's not a one off piece of clothing he was wearing from that company.
As for the cross, it is a design used in Georgia, including on their traditional flags:
And it is known as a Bolnisi Cross
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolnisi_cross
And can even be found in ancient Georgian architecture, specifically with a circle around it:
It is similar to the German iron cross, except the iron cross always has white or iron bolding, which the Bolnisi Cross does not
(You can compare them in these search results: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=fpas&q=german+iron+cross&ia=images&iax=images)
He did give multiple apologies for using it tho and as far as I've known hasn't used the word in many years
I'm trying to understand it because for example I, if faced with something like the Trolley problem, would pull the lever so that whatever ends up being less deaths in the long term is the rail selected.
But based off the second paragraph you wrote, it sounds like you'd either never pull the lever or would choose the rail that kills the least even if more die in the long run.
For example, you mention infanticide would be bad. But if you don't use vaccines because it uses chicken eggs, you could hypothetically still lead to dead infants via the spread of disease.
And then there's the insects part - wouldn't this omit farming that uses pesticides then? How do you know which did or didn't? It would also include I'd imagine farms that say release ladybugs to control other insects since it required the exploitation of ladybugs.
But virtually all medicine was tested on animals. It's not about if the medication itself is made with/without animal products, it's that animals were harmed or killed in testing to make sure they were safe for humans. Or used animal cell lines.
Or what about vaccines that save animals, but used animals to create, like the rabies packets?
Likewise, if you're using plastic, you're using something made of oil, which the extraction and use of is causing catastrophic environmental damage and harming untold amounts of animals. You could then easily argue that the wanton exploitation of nature is very much the exploitation of animals, even to a far greater degree than certain animal husbandry techniques or raising styles.
Lastly, where do insects fall? Some insects have a decent level of intelligence, if that's a criteria. And there's also things like hives which are unique intelligences.
If we go by the first published definition of veganism, it would seem to me the only way to truly abide by it would be to live without any modern technology, in the wild, with only materials made without pesticides or machinery.
That's why I'm wondering where the line is drawn.
Oh hey it's the racist previously named Germanixx, with a fresh alt.
This xkcd comic is US centered, but I think it still applies here:
Dionysus would disagree