Kache

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kache@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

In the US? IMO only possible in exclusive environments similar to saunas at spas or membership-based clubs/gyms

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think your ideas are too non-practical/specialized/advanced/low-level for your stated goal of 'digital literacy". They read more like college intro/followup course material and are too esoteric to be readily absorbed, esp by generic teenagers, even if they've self-selected to be "lightly interested".

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

One of the best tutorials on really "grokking" git concepts, and it's online and interactive: https://learngitbranching.js.org

For programming, start with buildings things for yourself. Be practical, start small, and iterate, regardless if you consider the previous iteration was a success or failure. I've heard good things about https://automatetheboringstuff.com/ (in Python) in this regard.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can address it by writing code that doesn't depend much on indentation, which also makes code more linear and easier to follow.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Call their bluff!

If they're SO concerned and want help signing bans for imaginary problems into law, there are plenty of real issues worth trading for in exchange.

E.g. from now on, schools nationwide are additionally funded to both prohibit litterboxes for students that identify as cats and provide free and healthy school lunches.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Idgi -- is it saying that every game is either named "X" or "Y's X"?

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's the practical distinction between "everyone can do it with some dedicated intent" (so few actually bother) vs "everyone can do it on a whim"

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seems it depends on which elite/establishment, going by Wikipedia's definition: "populism" is the political stance of "the people" against "the elite/establishment"

So by that defn, both of these examples qualify:

  • The people being distrustful of the establishment of medical science
  • The people condemning the unfair practices of a monopolistic/oligopolistic establishment
[–] Kache@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

wanted to add something to the end of a for-loop, but had too little indentation

To address this, I prefer reducing length & depth of nested code, so the for/while is rarely ever not visible along with everything inside it. Others have success with editors that draw indentation lines.

opening up new/anonymous scopes

I occasionally use Python nested functions for this purpose

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I find it's possible to operate Python as a statically typed language if you wanted, though it takes some setup with external tooling. It wasn't hard, but had to set up pyright, editor integration, configuration to type check strictly and along with tests, and CI.

I even find the type system to be far more powerful than how I remembered Java's to be (though I'm not familiar with the newest Java versions).

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (7 children)

All methods? Of course not. Just methods like these.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

I really dislike code like that. Code like that tends to lie about what it says it does and have non-explicit interactions/dependencies.

The only thing I can really be certain from that is:

  doAnything();
  if(doAnything2()) {
    doAnything3();
  }

I.e. almost nothing at all because the abstractions aren't useful.

view more: ‹ prev next ›