IzzyJ

joined 1 year ago
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This. So much this. Im tempted to try at the House just to see how well a campaign built on exactly this and progressive economics works

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This only works if a new centralized network doesnt take its place, Blueskys existence kinda proves thats not always the case

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Heres the thing with federation

It will always be more complicated, and lead to smaller segregated communities. This mitigstes the network effect social media services rely on

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I did, for one

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you had told me ten years ago that one day "°I will report you to doge" would be a valid sentence and a real threat, I wouldve died

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Im not even sure theyre blind to it, they just only care about winning ethics be dammed

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yes actually. The ends do justify the meansz and democracy should.be suspended for its own protection if necessary; which clearly it is. I'd go further, the whole republican party shouldve been purged. Paradox of tolerance and all that

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And I suppose allowing the guy wholl put boots on the ground to make sure your friends and family die off faster to ascend to the Oval Office was the right call? Because that is literally every other option

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I actuwlly still voted for the option that would mitigate their suffering, and that was one of the reasons. I can criticize someone, consider them bigoted, without being part of the problem.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Anyone who was not voting against Trump by default shouldnt be voting at all. I dont blame her for expecting to operate in a world of sanity

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your vote was won by a guy pretending to make fries when he specifically says he wants to deport people like you, you're a walking argument against democracy as a concept

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Genuinely, what do you think she could specifically do to capture more of a demographic like that?

 

Lemmy is a smaller site than Reddit, even before taking into account federation. So I cast a wide net here. A lot of specific popular shows like Futurama have dedicated communities, but I thought it'd be fun to have a generalized one

https://lemmy.world/c/animatedseries

 

I constantly see angry mobs of people decrying "woke", "critical race theory", ""grooming"", and whatever other nonsense they made up this week. They march around with guns, constantly appending lib as a prefix to any word they can use to denigrate. They actively plot violence and spew hatred in the open.

You never see the inverse. There is no ConservativesofTiktok getting churches harassed into shutting down for the day or calling in threats. You don't see cringey boomer memes on the left. And whenever I openly express those feelings, try to create that sentiment; I get shut down. Noone agrees, I'm often shamed and muted. I just don't understand why that parity exists, it's extremely isolating to feel so alone in this

 

I know a little bit of lore, but not a whole lot (I just listen to lore channels at work lol). But the question occurred to me upon thinking about midichlorians. I recall hearing somewhere they connect to blood cells, but I know I'm losing my mind so maybe I just made that up somewhere

 
4
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IzzyJ@lemmy.world to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world
 

Some people feel the term is outdated. They say this while parading around what to me seem oxymorons, like "non binary women" or "he/him lesbians".

When a lot of these people say they aren't comfortable with their gender, I notice they often mention things like clothes, makeup, hobbies. More generally, they seem to talk about gender roles- masculine and feminine- than something to do with their bodies.

Here's the fact of the matter. Bathrooms, pronouns, legal documents; they aren't referring to any of that. They're referring to what's in your pants, or if you have boobs, or grow facial hair. Most people, myself included, don't care if you wanna wear clothes or behave in a way assigned to the opposed sex (there are folks who do of course, and most of us here know they're assholes). But unless you're changing something about that, it doesn't warrent a change in your pronouns or documents or bathrooms. As much as my own rights are under threat, I can't help but sympathize with the folks upset with that, I don't wanna share the ladies' room with what amounts to a femboy or "metrosexual" either.

Sex is bimodal, and I use the term bimodal specifically. There are edge cases, such as intersex people, or those with hormonal conditions like PCOS. I would argue transsexuals, those like myself who seek to change or sex, are among them. And hell, actual enben who seek out procedures like gender nullification too. I don't take hormones because I want to be feminine. I take them to be as close to female as I can possibly get with the medical technology available. That's how I want to be seen, and treated. I plan on surgery to change what's in my pants. If I could get a menstrual cycle out of that, I would, and probably go on to have children (because infertility is another perk of transition).

I don't have anything against the sorts of people I'm talking about- I want to be abundantly clear on that. Same with those who say, dont want bottom surgery. My frustration is more with the terminology, because there is a delineation there that I feel is erased. People decry older terms like transsexual as "outdated", but I feel it's much more apt for my experience. I am transitioning to the other sex (or as close as I can). My gender has been constant all the while

view more: next ›