GissaMittJobb

joined 1 year ago
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Barring some technical breakthrough, I am inclined to agree.

We can and should build extensive high-speed rail networks, though. This will provide intra-continental mobility at a price affordable for everyone. While gratuitous trips to the other side of the world will no longer be feasible, fast intra-continental trips can in many cases take their place. Flying can remain a niche for when it's completely unavoidable, in which case we should be able to absorb the emissions.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Actual emissions taxing is basically a necessary step when it comes to air travel - currently, the fuel is completely tax free and that's not great. Take all of that money and pump it directly into rail, which is the actual way forward for intra-continental travel.

It will get more expensive and less accessible for lower income people. There's just really no way around that.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Normally I will default to siding with workers, but I'm not siding with the pilots on this one. No way.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

The old rules don't apply under Trump unfortunately

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

Rejecting harm reduction predictably leads to full harm.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

Barring societal collapse I believe I will be able to retire, but that's only because I've gotten extraordinarily lucky in life.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

As mentioned in the video, these are pretty hostile to pedestrians. Without knowing too much about the subject, I wouldn't be surprised if roundabouts beat them handily - why else would countries with better road safety opt for roundabouts over diverging diamonds?

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's also when using a blocked word on lemmy.ml, but will only show as such for users of that instance.

The r-word is on that list, and I believe the b-word might be as well.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Return without a deal? I'm not sure that's going to be good for the union long-term.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 days ago

Porn isn't going anywhere. LoL

Give Project 2025 a read. Wild things in there.

Gay marriage? It's already dangerous to just come out, let alone get married.

Thanks to who?

And contraception? They'ren already losing that one too in many states thanks to local governments anyway.

Literally a direct cause of the last Trump administration.

 

Framåt för Vänsterpartiet, S och Miljöpartiet, och back för Centerpartiet, KD och SD.

L håller sig kvar med liten marginal, och M ökar något.

Allt som allt ett bra val ifrån Sverige, i kontrast med övriga EU som verkar tappat förståndet.

 

I'm getting close to the bottom of my backlog on a few podcasts, so I'm looking to get something new in there.

Personally, it's been, in no particular order:

  • If Books Could Kill
  • Darknet Diaries
  • Hard Fork
  • 99% Invisible
  • The War on Cars
  • The Urbanist Agenda
  • The Climate Denier's Playbook
  • Well There's Your Problem

I'm mildly considering getting into Behind the Bastards and It Could Happen Here, but I'm a little bit skeptical on account of how damn much there is to be listened to in their feed.

 

Det var väl på tiden.

Jag är inte helt nöjd med hur facken presterat i den här frågan, mer behöver göras.

 

Högförräderi från politikernas sida. Må historien minnas deras brott.

 

Kul om sant, men har vi förtroende för att S faktiskt kommer försöka driva igenom frågan? Jag är skeptisk men positivt förvånad.

 

Vilket skämtparti. Riktigt bisarrt.

 

Minst väntade fördelen med att gå med i Nato - förbättrade järnvägar?

view more: ‹ prev next ›