AFKBRBChocolate

joined 2 years ago
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 44 minutes ago

I was being a little factitious, though honestly I don't know what a tibetan monk does day to day. I had an uncle who was a Trappist monk a bunch of years ago, but that's a different thing. I certainly didn't have a bunch of illicit sex in my mental image of them.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

We were restricted even on some proprietary software (especially if it was from a foreign owned company), but you'd be surprised how much scrutiny some of the major packages have had.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

A lot of government stuff requires that they have complete provenance of all code in the system. When you have people contributing to it from different places - potentially different countries - they get nervous about it.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Or become a monk, have a bunch of sex, and pay off the occasional blackmail out of the donation funds. I mean, it seems like monks have a great life except for the celibacy thing, so if you take that off the table, maybe it's not a bad deal.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I've never thought so. I mean, I guess it's hard to quantify, but that's different from being ambiguous. If someone asked you, "Who in your high school class did people make fun of the most," you might know right away who it would be, or there might be multiple contenders. Other people in your class might have different opinions, but that doesn't mean you all don't know what the question is, just that it's hard to measure.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (4 children)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I can smell this picture

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Where I worked, many of the contacts specifically said we could not use open source software, so no, it is not always available.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I was a kin in the 70s, we had an exchange student from a little town in Sonora Mexico stay with us. His english wasn't great (though much better than my spanish), but he had this really strange accent. It turned out that he loved old hollywood gangster movies, so he was talking like Edward G Robinson, but with a thick spanish accent over the top.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Oh, that's a little better. I live in California, where small earthquakes aren't uncommon, so not something that looks okay to me, but better than just propped up on the edge.

 
 

I've mostly been a .world user, but have this alt account on .ca as a backup. I logged into it to make sure I didn't have anything in my inbox, and noticed that everything loads so much faster. In both cases I'm using the browser interface from my tablet, sorting by all. On .world, there's a pause before the text comes up, then the thumbnails and graphics slowly populate. On .ca, it all pretty much loads instantly.

Is it just the number of users being a lot bigger? More community activity? Hardware differences? Running different software versions? A combination of these? I'm curious.

 

If you were going to draw up a list of the people most responsible for the latest indictment of Donald Trump, the former president himself would be at the top, followed by the prosecutors who have brought the case. Republicans in Congress perversely deserve a great deal of credit, too, since they could have exiled Trump from political life and perhaps spared him more intense legal scrutiny if they had voted to convict him in the impeachment trial over his role in the siege of the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Ultimately, however, you cannot tell the story of Trump’s historic indictment without Nancy Pelosi. It was the then-Speaker of the House who insisted that there be a congressional inquiry following January 6. And it was the work of the select committee she fashioned that finally appears to have spurred a reluctant Justice Department to action, setting in motion a more intense phase of criminal scrutiny focused on Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The resulting indictment closely tracks the select committee’s work and findings, presenting a factual narrative that traces — almost identically — the evidence presented by the committee of a sophisticated, multipronged effort by Trump to remain in power that culminated in the mayhem at the U.S. Capitol.

 

It seems like most times I go to my .world account, I get the bad gateway error. Is there a fix for this?

view more: next ›