this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43788 readers
736 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me : Trippie Redd's "!" Is actually a great album

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 92 points 5 months ago (6 children)

When people complain about new music not living up to old, it just means they've quit exploring and form their prejudices on the pop genre they hear, which has always been the lowest hanging song on the tree.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 36 points 5 months ago

absolute truth right here. I used to be like that, "Brehh Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd and Queen were the last good bands". Looking back I was such a tool. First because it's such a douche thing to belittle people for their music preference, and second because there is a ton of a great music. Now I can say I'm honestly a huge swiftie and I like a ton of music across several decades.

We have the most variety of music in history right now. To say "I don't like new music" is absurd, and you're exactly right, just means they just don't even try.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think survivorship bias plays into it as well. Yeah, most the stuff on the radio today is kinda meh. Most the stuff on the radio in those days was kinda meh too. All the meh songs got forgotten, and you only remember the bangers. You've already seen it happen to 00s music and we're watching it happen with the 10s.

But yeah, it's wild how many people look at how accessible different types of music are now and just... don't go looking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As an unpopular opinion on the other end, it’s ok to stop participating in pop culture. Pop music, Blockbuster movies, and TV are all meant to sell consumerism to young people with disposable incomes. Not to people who are bogged down by kids and mortgages.

New media isn’t made for your tastes, so unless you make an effort to change your tastes to those of the current generation of young people, new media will never be seen as good enough by you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 58 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Modern electronic music is the spiritual successor to classical music (and modern-day "classical" compositions are just rehashes).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 49 points 5 months ago

Taylor Swift is fine, her music is enjoyable, but ultimately kind of forgettable. Her popularity comes from the social-cohesion function of popular music.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 41 points 5 months ago (4 children)

IDK if it’s unpopular, but I’m worried that TikTok, Instagram, and Youtube Shorts have completely screwed with what kind of music gets popular nowadays. It seems like every popular song has some kind of intense drop because content creators love the “quick build up to some kind of visual punchline” video format and it has ruined what I think could otherwise influence and encourage originality

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Historically, music changes to fit the medium that's used to deliver it to the listener. Short form video is no different. I just have to trust that artists will always find ways to say what they need to say. After all, "the enemy of art is the absence of limitations."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Separating the artist from the art is fine.
You can like music by someone who doesn't share your social, political, or religious beliefs with.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Upvoted because this is the one I most strongly disagree with.

Hitlers art but ignore the holocaust?

Lost Prophets but ignore the lead singers horrifying SA of children?

Kanye West and his anti semitism insanity?

Chris Brown and beating the shit out of women?

R. Kelly and SA a child?

Rowling and her hatred of trans children?

Michael Jackson and his .. weird child obsession?

Gary Glitter and his SA?

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Separating the artist from the art is fine for me as long as you don't support them. There is nothing inherently wrong with consuming media you like from a controversial figure.

Of course it's hard to separate the artist and the art if you actively give them money for it.

I like some of Kanye West's music but I would never spend a single cent on one of his albums, watch an ad on Youtube for his music videos or listen to his songs on streaming services.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I cant stand listening to someone singing, knowing full well they rape children 🤷‍♀️

each to their own I suppose

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

the examples you gave

Yes, that’s what separating the art from the artist means.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

I'll go a step further:

You have to separate the art from the artist because there is not a single artist I've ever encountered who wasn't some kind of fucking trashhole of a person.

Artists spent their lives on being artists, not developing good interpersonal skills or understanding politics or philosophy.

Beleiving an artist is a "good person" is just setting yourself up for disappointment. Start out assuming they suck dogshit and you usually end up being right.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (23 children)

Most rap sucks and it's effects on mainstream media have had detrimental effects on society as a whole.

It literally just glorifies the ghetto lifestyle of being a piece of shit and acting like it's the only way you can live life.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 26 points 5 months ago (3 children)

"the Beatles are overrated" is a poorly defined statement often made by people who give the impression they want to be seen as an iconoclast of some sort.

Ok. Overrated on what metrics? Historical impact? Popularity at the time? Popularity now?

"I don't like the Beatles' music" is probably closer to what people mean, and that's fine. I rarely listen to them on purpose. But the whole "I don't like them, and neither should you" thing is kind of insufferable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Some music is made by and for lowlifes, where I live is Vallenato, Campesina, Rancheras, Bachata, and 90%of reggaeton.

Lyrics about asking for forgiveness after cheating, smoking, domestic violent (being the one that does the domestic violence), admitting to spike drinks and brag about it, simping for drug Lords, and women are nothing but a sex object.

The people who listen to that music is just as you imagine them. Uneducated, sexist, wife beaters, going around in huge SUVs blasting that music outloud with no respect for anyone around then, they are the ones who start blasting the music at 1AM on a Wednesday and doesn't let anyone sleep in their entire neighborhood.

People give me shit for this and claim is "culture" but I think there is such a thing as music for lowlifes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Eric Clapton is wildly overrated

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 months ago (7 children)

There are too many damn love songs. 75% of all music does not need to be about love, relationships, and breakups. I stopped listening to radio because all the damn love songs got annoying.

Can we please have more songs about literally anything else. Weed, flowers, rainy days, animal companions, construction work, types of cars, card games, anything. There’s more in life to sing about than just relationships and/or the lack of them!

Sincerely, A person whose sexuality is “No” and has no interest in that kind of relationship.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (8 children)

There is, in fact, good country music that isn't just about trucks, beer, flags, and right-wing U.S. propaganda.

People have a lot of hate for the genre due to the mass appeal, common denominator examples. But like with all music, dig a little deeper beyond what gets radio play and you can find some good shit.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Had a chat with a coworker about this. I'm not a big fan of the genre as a whole, but something happened to the genre around 20ish years ago. The country twang went from being a natural signature sound of some artists to being something everyone emulated while singing their bird cage bottom piece of shit piece about their truck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Firebirdie713@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Disturbed's cover of Sound of Silence is not only awful, it is an antithesis of the meaning of the song. Anyone who likes that version better than S&G's arguably doesn't understand the point of the song, and the fact that everyone holds it up as the gold standard of "covers better than the original" is even worse.

A close second is Postmodern Jukebox and their horrendous tendencies to take tempos to an opposite extreme instead of finding more meaningful ways of changing the genre of a song. I like some of their stuff, but the number of people who love their cover of Welcome to the Jungle is mind-boggling to me.

There are plenty of songs that I prefer the cover of to the original (Whitney Houston's 'I Will Always Love You'), or ones that just give the original a modern coat of paint without changing much else (Smash Mouth's 'I'm a Believer'), but these songs in particular are just awful imo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Modern music slaps. Just gotta find the right albums.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Most hip hop is missing key musical elements and just isn’t good. I have no idea why the genre became so popular.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] macabrett@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago (6 children)

We're in the best time to listen to music. There's amazing stuff out there. It just doesn't come to you automatically, you've got to seek it out.

Now, it's a pretty bad time to be an artist trying to make a living. But it's also the easiest time to DIY music.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

Lyrics ruin most music. This is one is weird because I actually love the sound of the human voice, but it most music its just ugly. Also most of the lyrics themselves suck. Usually vague, meaningless, hoping you'll interpret them as something deep. There's just so many songs that most lyrics have to be bad.

Also drums ruin most music. They are harsh, dissonant, overly loud, overpower subtler instruments, and reduce complex, varying melodies to a simple beat. Even when I want simple heavy beats, I prefer electronic alternatives (no idea what they're called) so it's not so harsh

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Rap and Hiphop are just shit music.

I have a pretty broad music taste, I have rock, classical, pop, eurodance, opera, bitpop, industrial, metal, ballads and more on my phone, except rap or hiphop.

There is just something in me that as soon as I hear either it just sounds like shit.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] improbablypoopingrn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago (5 children)

David Bowie had like, 2 okay songs.

[–] Titou@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

You're walking on dangerous road mate

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Trollivier@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (13 children)

Being a metalhead, most of my opinions about music are unpopular I guess. Or are they?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago (8 children)

When someone dies or leaves the band, you have a new band and should give it a new name.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Brickardo@feddit.nl 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Pink Floyd is the most mediocre group in the prog rock scene (also works if you remove everything after 'group')

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Lyrics don't add value to 99.99% of music and any notes from them should be from an actual instrument.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I dislike modern pop's mixing of the human voice, mixed so high compared to the rest, to the point where you can't hear instruments anymore. The music is often there just for accompanyment, elevetor music. I rather have chillwave, where everything is one big reverb trick pony, than having to hear people screaming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don't care for Dylan or the Beatles. At least I understand the ground-breaking work of the Beatles, but Dylan is incomprehensible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The beatles are vastly overrated. They may have been trailblazers at the time but their music really doesn’t hold up

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Decade or two ago I would agree with you.

Nowadays not that much. Ofc those radio songs you've heard more than billion times are awful and helps nobody to appreciate Beatles. But if you dig a bit deeper into songs that are ignored by radios, there are quite some good songs.

For one, I can't believe Helter Skelter was made by the same Beatles as e.g. Help. Or whole Sgt. Pepper album is nice too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Interstellar_1@pawb.social 10 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Imagine Dragons is pretty good

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (10 children)

I never got the hype for Satriani’s music. He’s a virtuoso for sure, but I never really found his music interesting.

This is probably high school nostalgia kicking in, but Limp Bizkit is great. lmao

There is actually some great kpop music out there.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

That rap is absolute garbage. For reasons I can't explain it makes me unbelievably angry to have to listen to. It probably has something to do with a combination of my anxiety and sensitivity to loud noises, but I don't know. I do like metal, although I don't like it particularly loud.

load more comments
view more: next ›