this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
171 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I remember how virulently ageist Democrats were against Sanders when he was running for president at age 75 back in 2016.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What's funny is NO ONE questions Bernie's age. He's out there killing it at his age.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

He’s also never going to be president. I wish he was, but I won’t be voting for him in the 2028 primaries. I’ll probably vote for AOC or whoever else takes his place.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 6 months ago (3 children)

According to Social Security’s Actuarial Life Tables, Joe Biden has a life expectancy of 7 years, and there’s about a 1/3 chance he will die before he is 86.

Trump currently has a life expectancy of 9 years, and there’s about a 1/4 chance he will die before he is 82.

So, as it’s looking now, regardless of the election results it’s about a 29% chance that the next president dies in office. At that level of risk you basically have to plan for it - or it would be foolish not to.

[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wooo let's pick a leader which we have to bet if they die or not in office.

How much longer are boomers going to death grip power.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden's not a boomer. He's Silent Generation. Boomers are all younger than Biden.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

This is both hilarious and depressing.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Actuarial tables are a magnificent tool for when you’re betting en Masse and terrible if you’re betting once. My money is on the slightly older individual who takes care of himself and has shown only slight age based decline as opposed to the man who is two years younger, obese, lives off fast food, doesn’t exercise, and seems to be at a further stage of decline to my 90 year old grandpa.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

I too would bet on Biden. I was just trying to stick to the facts. The facts are that they’re both old as shit. Biden is the same age as my grandmother. She has her wits about her. But nobody lives forever. I think a 5% annual chance of death is a fair assessment for anybody who’s 80. That’s still a 95% of survival.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thats not factoring in the absolutely top class medical care that the president gets. I would wager that significantly skews the stats in bidens favor, as current president.. especially considering how we've heard the white house doc under Trump basically threw pills around at like 100x the acceptable rate.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

and, again, the general population has, comparatively, shit for healthcare access and no where near the level of care that the president does. Which does absolutely skew things in that individual instance.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I cannot parse the sentence that is the headline I don't understand what it's saying

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember when your English/grammar teacher taught you to put book, movie, article, etc. titles in quotes? The editor did not do that.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

To be fair, English also taught me to capitalize every word in a title, but people get upset when you do that online. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago

Don't let the upvotes fool you. Lots of bandwagon jumpers. Hell, on reddit people downvoted great comments just because it had a emoji or some dumb shit 🤪🤪🤪

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

"Netflix is a joke" is a comedy fest for Netflix.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Any one of those words could be nouns, verbs or idiomatic expressions and nobody could tell

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden and Trump are only four years apart. They could’ve gone to high school together. Maybe they should spray paint Biden orange and yellow too.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Come next election, Trump will be older than Biden was during last election when Republicans were saying he (Biden) was too old

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Trump was saying Biden was too old in 2020.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

That's what I'm saying

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Yea and next election he will be the age that biden was in 2020

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 37 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, clearly age is just a number. Jimmy Carter should have run for a second term... 99, 81 what's the difference really? As long as they surround themselves with the right people.

Politics is ridiculous

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

IF they surround themselves with good people.

If we need to rely on them...why don't we just vote THEM in? I don't need a figure head, I need a leader.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Because no single advisor can ever be well-rounded enough. Part of being a leader, and maybe the biggest part, is identifying people you should listen to, amalgamating all the input, adding your own take and moving forward.

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The difference the physical breakdown of the body that happens in old age. Neither the chucklefuck fascist or Biden should have been allowed to run.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think that since you have to be 35 to run. We should have a max age... ~70 or with in 20 years of the average age of vote eligible adults, which ever is lower.

But that's apparently crazy talk.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Carter did run for a second term. Unfortunately, he lost to Reagan.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

John Stewart and Mike Birbiglia, would have loved to have seen that.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

That title is super confusing.