this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
93 points (79.2% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago (3 children)

No real man believes that. Real men see him for the scumbag he is and know that he has no respect for anyone.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Well thats just patently untrue.

He has plenty of respect for himself

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

He has plenty of respect for himself.

I can't stop laughing.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No he doesn’t. That’s why he constantly needs it from others.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

I don't think he does, he doesn't mind playing the fool...

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

We're talking about Real Men^TM^ here.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They are just as real men as the next asshole. Cut the real man crap.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Don't lump me in with trash like that. No one likes a bigot.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The whole concept of a real man is bs.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure they're even human

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Most men are idiots.

Signed,

A man

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Most people are idiots.

Signed,

A people

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure most men that support Donald Trump don't give a fuck if he respects women or not.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sure most men that support Donald Trump don't respect women.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm still (i can't even find the word to express the emotion) from reading about the stuff for sale at his rallies that says "joe and the ho need to go."

Especially when it could be easily changed to not be misogynistic:

Joe and co need to go

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You have to appreciate the irony given the fact that Donald Trump has made a habit of having sexual relationships with sex workers, so much so that he married Melania who was an escort.

I'm not knocking sex workers. That is a perfectly valid way to make money in my opinion. I just think it's a little bit of the pot calling the kettle black. Then again, that is par for the course with the MAGA crowd.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

That’s an A+ /c/nottheonion headline.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

Grab her by the pussy.

Yeah this guy totally knows what girls want.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

NY Times sure is slobbing on Donnie's knob. Like, wtf even is this?

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I'm not really a fan of this poll

The wording is kind of wonky, a lot/some/not much/not at all leaves a lot to be desired for me.

"Some" is kind of ambiguous. I'd like to believe that most people would read it as it's intended from the context, but I'm certain that some idiots probably interpreted it as something like "he has respect for some women" and not as "he has some respect for women in general"

"Some" also just feels like it leaves too much open to interpretation as to "how much is some." Personally, in a lot of other contexts I'd tend to read "some" as pretty much synonymous "not much" and while in this poll those responses are right next to each other, they are still supposed to be distinct from each other. This should probably have been a "'On a scale of 1-4, how much do you think trump respects women?' With 0 being 'not at all' and 4 being 'a lot'" type question

There's also the matter of what is meant by "respect." Does he respect them as equals? Does he respect their rights? Their opinions? Does he respect them because they're able to bear children? Does he respect their physical beauty?

It's hard to get truly representative sample sizes of the voting population because it's such a large and diverse group, and 875 respondents doesn't really inspire a whole lot of confidence in me about this poll's accuracy when there's well over 100,000,000 registered voters, especially without any other demographic info about who responded.

Just my 2¢ on the matter anyway

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Paywall, but This isn’t even a opinion piece. They’re pretending it’s actual journalism.

NYT, you just can’t stop can you.

Must. Somehow. Normalize. Trump.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"We demand a horse race!"

Someday in the future, when they're writing about the downfall of the US, I hope they point out how unrestrained capitalism's lust for perpetual growth sacrificed journalism for engagement and that so many Americans were deceived about what the truth was, because it was profitable to do so.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Shareholder value is the real truth.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 6 months ago

Well, that’s settled then.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

No they don't... Next

[–] Keaipo@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

Odds are, incels polled say.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

More evidence I am a non-human male.

[–] antidote101@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm assuming they mean, most male trump supporters say.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

It says "registered voters" on the chart.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Trump, a man known for bragging about grabbing women’s private parts — and on trial in connection with the cover-up of a sex scandal involving a porn star — has long symbolized a kind of machismo that to many people reads as misogyny.

But that disparity is important to understand in an election that already seems primed to turn on the question of just how big the gender gap between Trump, who draws more support from men, and President Biden, who leads among women, is going to be.

“The best explanation for that is, men are from Mars, women are from Venus,” Ayres said, adding that the best way for Trump to improve his standing in the eyes of female voters was simply to “change the subject.”

She is intrigued by the environmental activism of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the independent presidential candidate, but says she plans to vote for Biden in November because she sees that as the best way to stop Trump.

AL: In a legal sense, it asks the court to decide an untested question of whether a former president can be prosecuted for official conduct, which the special counsel Jack Smith argues is possible.

AL: If Smith gets a complicated win, one that sends it back to the lower courts to do more work, draw more distinctions, perhaps even be subject to further appeals, the practical question of whether this trial can get done before the election evaporates.


The original article contains 1,501 words, the summary contains 242 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] babypigeon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'm going to assume the summary cut out a bunch of relevant words, cause this sounds like total bullshit.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

That's why I tell my coworkers I'm going to grab 'em by the pussy on international women's day.

On my anniversary I honor my partner by sleeping with another woman - especially if my partner happens to be pregnant. I believe in the sanctity of marriage.

/s Trump is a fucking clown that is only overshadowed by the idiots that vote for him.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure Trump only respects dictators.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

how much they think former President Trump respects women: a lot, some, not much or not at all? [...] A majority of men — 54 percent — said that Trump respects women either “a lot” or “some.” Just 31 percent of women saw things that way.

So 46% of men and 69% of women think trump doesn't respect women.

The real question is going to be whether that opinion matters to each person.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

His supporters do as well, as you can see when Jordan Klepper talks to those wearing t-shirts that say "trump that bitxh" or "Hillary sucks but not like Monica"

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago