this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
159 points (90.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3405 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 50 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Imagine getting 80% of the vote in an unopposed election, in a massively important state, and completely ignoring the explicit reason why. If Biden loses Michigan it will 100% be his fault.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Worth noting that Michigan lets people vote on either the democratic or republican ballot, regardless of how they are registered. Lot's of people like myself chose to vote on the republican ballot against Trump because we felt confident in Biden winning. That probably put him closer to 80%.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Lot's of people like myself chose to vote on the republican ballot against Trump

Yup. Me too. Had to hold my nose to do it though.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (53 children)

Go ahead and vote against Biden in the November election then too. When Trump's Nazi Regime is rounding up Muslims to put in camps, at least you will have stuck it to Biden.

[–] shadearg@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden will win the popular vote by a record-breaking amount, 100%; there is no question about that. However, the United States does not elect a president in accordance with the popular vote.

Biden can lose the electoral college at the fringe, which is literally every other metric. If you care about the presidency, care about the fringe; and do everything possible to shore it up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

In 2020 38% of the vote was from Dems, 38% from republicans...

What wins/loses Michigan is independent voters, and Biden doesn't do well with them, because they want more than "I'm not the other guy! Even tho we agree on lots of stuff, we're still different"

Hell. biden isn't even doing well with Dem voters in an unopposed primary.

That should make everyone very concerned, but there's a vocal minority of Biden supporters who demand 100% loyalty and 0% questions.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

More like we're tired of people like you not offering any solutions, just shitting on the only non fascist with a chance.

[–] shikitohno@kbin.social 22 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Could just be that you can only run so many campaigns in a row with "If you don't vote for us, it's going to be the end of the world as we know it. And at least I'm not as bad as the other guy." With the exception of Obama's first run against McCain, that's been the pitch for every single election I've ever been able to vote in, as well as a few before it. It gets old real quick, makes them come off as insincere, and doesn't motivate anyone when we're still largely dealing with the same BS issues that we were 20 years ago.

Trying to browbeat people into voting with the same old song and dance has diminishing returns, especially when your candidate is increasingly out of step with many of the voters they should be courting on major issues.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We're just suppose to be happy with voting against a facist instead of voting for someone who's political philosophies match our own. The worst part is Dems don't realize this is basically going to be every election from now on and if they don't change their tune they'll lose to voter apathy

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Well read leftists have often said things like neoliberalism leads to fascism, or neoliberalism holds space for fascism to take, and I can't believe how few people have recognized that they've been right about that all along. It's not even just a duopoly issue too, fascism is rising around the whole world.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cogman@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children)

The reason Biden got such a big uncommitted vote is the current ongoing genocide in Israel. The solution is him doing more than simply calling Netanyahu an asshole then turning around and saying "I'm a Zionist".

IDK, it could also be that Biden is continuing the trump era "lock kids in cages" border policies and has signalled he wants to be even more cruel at the border. So he could stop that as well.

The time has passed, but he could have also not ran this time around. However, his ego got in the way. He has had dismissal approval numbers and he still chose to run which has put us in this position.

The solution is for Biden to listen to the voters before November and to change tact on critical issues. Before he loses a chunk of voters that simply don't vote because the choice between two genocidal candidates violates their moral compass.

I say all this as someone that will vote Biden. He's out of touch and running a terrible campaign. For fucks sake, he should be saying "abortion" at every rally, but he won't because he's a devout Catholic that has a hard time hitting so hard on a clearly winning issue.

His campaign can be summed up as "I'm not trump" which is exactly what fucking got trump into power the last time.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Froyn@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"I'm not the other guy" is actually a very strong case when you look at the other guy.
The other guy wanted a "Muslim ban".
The other guy has a subdivision in Israel named after him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Heights

Biden supports Israel due to long term alliances/treaties.
Trump supports Israel because they're killing undesirables.
They are not the same.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Biden supports Israel due to long term alliances/treaties.

That's not what Biden says...

He said that when he was a small child and Israel was formed (Biden is literally older than Israel) his dad told him that Israel were the good guys, and had Biden promise to always support them.

That is why Biden calls himself a Zionist and will always support Israel.

A promise a toddler made to his farther almost a century ago.

But hey, that's just going off what Biden has been saying for decades, and unfortunately we can't just believe what Biden says. He could be lying or just confused, it's a coin flip.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bruv, I’m just making the rational choice in a binary system. The choice that leads to less bad shit happening to me and the rest of the world.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Begrudgingly voting for Biden probably isn't enough. It's too close, and Biden doesn't excite voters enough.

You need to get others to do it too. And the fact is, that's really hard to do if you're trying to convince voters directly.

What's easier and has a chance of working is being outspoken now before the general has even started, and pray that someone on his campaign team realizes Biden is going to have to move left to beat trump.

Or you could tell people to shut up and hope Bidens campaign team realizes on their own before it's too late while getting zero feedback from voters.

Pick inaction all you like, I just don't like it's chances.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Tens of thousands of Michiganders on Tuesday cast their ballots for “uncommitted,” putting them on track to garner more than 10 percent of the vote statewide. That figure seemed likely to exceed past levels of “uncommitted” votes in Michigan Democratic primaries, though fall short of sparking a political earthquake.

I would say that as a Biden supporter, I do have some jitters, but "angst" isn't the right word. The current fraction of "uncommitted" votes is 13.3%, which isn't much higher than Obama's 10.7% in 2012. The difference could be random noise, but if it does represent approximately 2.6% of voters voting in protest then it should be something that the Biden campaign takes into account to some extent.

The weird thing to me is how many people showed up to vote - a little over 760,000 as opposed to 195,000 in 2012. I'm not familiar with Michigan politics enough to explain this, but I assume it wasn't caused by the presidential part of the election and it might have altered the average demographics of the voters relative to 2012.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

760,000 as opposed to 195,000 in 2012

Probably because Michigan had a caucus in 2012, not a primary.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In 2016, Trump beat Hillary in Michigan by less than 11,000 votes

Yesterday, 101,436 Democrats voted uncommitted in a noncompetitive primary against an incumbent president after just 3 weeks of statewide organizing to advocate for an "uncommitted" vote selection

The Democrats should be extremely worried. They would need to win Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Pennsylvania to get 271 electoral votes without Michigan. Do we feel so confident in that result to entrust the future of American democracy to it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the extra 3 points of uncommitted don't vote Biden in the general, Trump wins Michigan. His victory margin last election was less than 200k votes.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Not necessarily, Trump has also lost a lot of voters since 2020.

load more comments
view more: next ›