this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
545 points (97.2% liked)
News
23627 readers
3359 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Very much yes. And this time, let's complete the work.
Yes. I live in a southern shithole and i'd completely get it if America decided to bomb the entire place into a parking lot with no warnings.
No, please, bomb it into something other than a parking lot at least. The south already has way too fucking many of those.
America has invested a lot into bomb technology but we don't have one yet that will bomb something into, say, a library.
Could we bomb it into affordable housing?
We should have reconstructed harder...
Conservatives rejoice at the misery, oppression and death they cause. This is who conservatives are.
Can we give Texas back to Mexico so they can learn a little bit about human rights?
as a mexican national the sentiment is bus them to NYC 🗽 Nothing would change
There is so much evil going on in this world you don't even have time to process each act anymore. Because there is something else every few hours.
load more comments
(4 replies)
On today's episode of "The cruelty is the point"
"We'll teach those goddamn migrants. How dare they come here searching for a better life?"
I didn't realize states had the power to block federal personnel from performing their duties. Maybe they should activate the National Guard to protect the border patrol guys so they can do their jobs.
They don't but they told their soldiers they do. Federal border control isn't going to get in a shootout over it while it goes through the legal system.
What's got me is, why bother with the legal system? Just call up the Texas National Guard into federal service and order them to enforce the law as regards Border Patrol's access to the border. If they refuse, court martial 'em. Either way, Border Patrol gets access to the border to cut down Texas' illegal barriers, and Abbott gets an unsubtle reminder about how the states are subordinate to the federal government. Win-win scenario.
Pro Life!
Conservatives only care about children before they are born
Why is the federal government waiting for access from a state like Texas? Their officials are monsters and should be steamrolled to save lives.
Because the federal government isn't all that motivated to do anything about it. Republicans are evil and Democrats are apathetic.
So, these agents hear about an emergency situation at the park, but when they get there Texas state cops don't want to let them enter, so the agents... Just give up and go home? Gosh, no wonder people in Congress are talking about more funding for securing the border, we apparently don't even give our Border Patrol firearms if this is how easy it is to stop them.
Are you suggesting the Border Patrol get into a shooting match with the TX national guard? Both sides are armed. It deserves a court case, not a gun fight.
While a woman and two children drown? With all due respect, you can shove that court case right up Abbott's ass.
load more comments
(5 replies)
And nothing of value would be lost.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
When they grandly talk that every soldier must refuse orders going against human rights, and if not, be legible to be tried and punished afterwards, they are talking about these kind of orders...
Let's remember this when Texas' grid needs federal help again.
Fuck red states. If people want to deny other people assistance in times of need, I say we do the same to them.
I get what you mean here, but I MUST point out that many people who live in red states don't believe in the same ideology, or can't get out.
If there were a way to selectively punish the policy makers, and those that support it, I'm game. But this sounds like the same indiscriminate punishment rhetoric that Israel is using. (Please don't take offense, I know it's not how you meant it, just pointing it out)
I mean, we know who the republicans are.
Personally, I think no one who currently holds office as a republican should be allowed to hold any government office or work at any private entity that works with the government.
They've had years to leave the party as it has slid down into the nightmare it is today. The party is a hate group. Staying a member is damning.
Selectively punish policy makers? Um voting. That seems to not be a popular idea though.
It's not terribly effective due to the gerrymandering of the voting districts, everyone that is in office is still so because they gerrymander the district to people who vote along party lines, whether or not they know what they're doing.
Biden needs to send the Army in and take over the Texas Border enforcement.
Army outranks the National Guard, especially the state ones. The POTUS absolutely also does have power to command any National Guard unit to stand down as well.
Biden needs to send the Army in and take over the Texas Border enforcement.
He legally can't. He is not able to unilaterally use the military as a domestic police force. This keeps the executive from using the military as their personal cudgel.
I agree with the strong arming via national guard though. I think there are some hoops, but there's absolutely plenty of precedent for a president taking command of a state's national guard (specifically in regard to border control as well).
He absolutely can send an army unit with Orders to enforce his orders to the Nat. Guard.
Not police force, but actually to patrol the border? Isn't that what they were set up to do? (Albeit to defend against state actors and not individuals)
load more comments
(3 replies)
This crime occurred when people were crossing the border. The FBI needs to get involved and charge all involved with giving the order and physically restraining the agents with two counts of murder, and all present (excepting the Border Patrol agents) with accessory to murder.
view more: next ›