I guess a Ruble doesn't go as far as it used to
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Turns out the "fuck everyone who isn't me" party is not so great on cooperation.
The party of fiscal responsibility seems to be doing a pretty good job with their finances.
Right wing billionaires, it's time to steal the show!
This is exactly what they're excellent at. Spending other people's money with no real plan to recoup it, hoping the next big sucker will come along and bail them out to a golden parachute before the floor falls out.
But now the floor is falling and someone has to hold the bag. It's probably not going to be any billionaires.
No plan to recoup it? The trump tax cuts paid for their donations multiple times over. Pure graft.
It would be pretty easy for anyone to do a hostile takeover of the Libertarian Party. Anyone can register as a member and according to Wikipedia they have about 700,000 actual members. Billionaires and the Mitt Romney/Mike Pence/Ted Cruz wing of the GOP could swoop in and leave the name 'Republican' to the MAGoos.
How come? Did they go WoKe?
Seriously, it's because right-wing grifters (especially Trump) have been sucking up all the cash.
It used to be (in the Republican party) that after the elections Republican candidates would contribute their campaign funds back to the party. Trump put an end to that which has cash starved the local elections.
It used to be (in the Republican party) that after the elections Republican candidates would contribute their campaign funds back to the party
Something something, from each according to their ability to each according to their need? Redistribution of resources and all that...
What a weird choice for a photo
Right?
But I’ll be honest and admit it got me to click out of curiosity.
That is where the money went
In Arizona and Michigan, two states where the GOP presidential candidate will likely have to win a majority of suburban voters to get back in the White House, the state Republican parties are running critically short on money. In Arizona, the state GOP has just $14,800 left in the bank at the end of August, as reported by the Arizona Mirror.
$14,800 is an insanely low amount of money.
You can't win a contested small-time county election with $15k.
In Minnesota the republican party had $8000 in cash on hand and is $76,000 in debt the last I read in the local news. And that has been the general situation for the past year. There has been talk of bankruptcy.
Expect a shower of rubles to pour in and provide as much support as that anemic currency can afford.
So about a dollar.
Russia has their own more pressing issues currently.
Interfering with US gov decision making is currently a very high priority for them...
If you don't think American politics haven't been a pressing issue for Russia for the past decade at least, then you haven't been paying attention
Kind of crazy the funding issues (I don't want to call them problems because, honestly this is great news) are so widespread between states.
Really weird situation I hope gets investigated more. I would read an entire book on this.
The mother country having to expend it's resources on the war effort.
its resources*
Wouldn't "its" be the correct word. "It's" is a contraction for "it is." Or were you pointing out the mistake?
Seems the “I got mine” ideology would work better if they spread it around a bit instead of funneling it all to that fatass orange-utan they worship. He’s bankrupting their entire party and I couldn’t be happier!
Trump is hogging all the donations and isn't sharing the piggy bank with the state party peons. Oh no!
His "pay lawyers to stall outcomes of court cases long enough for a coup" item is already 114% of his budget.
It must be this. Families almost certainly are tithing to the big man directly.
Oh no! The ~~invisible hand of the market~~ ~~grifters and conmen~~ woke cancel culture has stolen my money!
Amazing what happens to the coffers when you let grifters run them.
You know what would help?
Buying my Jpeg-err, NFTs.
Here's an NFT of Trump riding a dragon and punching satan, it's only $200 million dollars~
It'll go to the moon, I pinky promise.
/jk
You can stay irrational for longer than you can remain solvent.
I'd rather be woke than broke 😴
Are they going to ask for a bailout?
Maybe they went woke.
They should embrace a famously good fundraiser like Kevin McCarthy.
Strange how this “fiscally conservative” political party is going bankrupt. Almost as if they were anything but fiscally responsible.
"STAY WOKE?"
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A recent draft report shared by insiders with MLive in early December said that the party was on "the brink of bankruptcy."
There are two competitive seats on the line in the Grand Canyon State's House of Representatives this year, where Republicans currently have a 31-29 majority.
A 2023 report by Politico revealed that the Colorado GOP was also struggling and facing eviction from its office because it could not pay rent, Deputy Chief of Staff Roger Hudson said.
Fundraising might not be Ziegler's number one issue as Florida lawmakers will vote on removing him on Monday following allegations that he raped a woman who had been sexually involved with him and his wife.
In addition to financial issues, the Michigan state GOP recently descended into chaos and infighting after a vote to remove its chair, Kristina Karamo, a 2020 election denier and ally of Trump, who is the party's leading 2024 candidate.
Newsweek reached out to the state Republican parties of Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan and Massachusetts by email on Monday for comment.
The original article contains 642 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
You've summarized other stories better, bot. This one was not a great summary.
Just break more campaign finance laws, everyone's doing it!
Prayer?
How considerate of them