this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
150 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You'd think if they cared about these credible allegations, they would care about some of their candidates credible allegations.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

I'm surprised they didn't pick him as their next senate candidate. I thought they liked rapists now.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And here I thought being a rapist was considered a qualification for being party chairman of the GOP.

See? The problem is that he has to also provide "value".

Provide value to GOP, and you can do a little rape.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

grab ‘em by the pussy

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yet they still support Matt Gaetz.........

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

They're called "pastors."

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Are they removing him so they can promote him to the national squad?

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's basically because they don't put themselves in the position of possibly losing any kind of power. Removing this guy looks good on them, and Florida is so solidly red at this point due to them fucking with the voting process that they have no worries. (Remember, EVERY accusation the Republicans have made, is a confession - Voter fraud is their big accusation right now...)

Part of the reason Republicans try so hard to give excuses for house seats, and senate seats, is because if they were to call for those expulsions, it would lose them a vote. They don't give a fuck about being righteous or not, they care about POWER.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can only assume the vote to remove him failed.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I probably should have posted the first paragraph of the article instead of my own quip about it but this is one of those broken clocks being right once in a while situations. They actually voted him out.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — The Republican Party of Florida ousted Chairman Christian Ziegler in a special vote on Monday as police investigate a rape accusation against him, a vote that came the week before Gov. Ron DeSantis competes in Iowa’s first-in-the-nation presidential caucus

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That depends on whether he “accepted” the vote. See: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/michigan-republicans-set-vote-chair-karamos-removal-promises-106154350

Just another truckload of evidence on the mountain that is republiQans-shouldn’t-be-a-real-thing, much less in power, and yet . . . here we are. Still.

Y’all convinced propaganda works yet? Anyone still buying the ol’ “liberal media” thing?

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

You love to see them reap what they sow!

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They only removed him because he can't fundraise.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Party of rich assholes going broke over too much fleecing the campaign funds to line their pockets. Classic.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago

Only the cult leader is infallible. The rules do not apply to him. They only apply to the cult members.

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"...and the top of the ticket with Trump as our nominee" - said the guy Ziegler replaced. I bet that made DeSantis feel good.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

He’s just a scapegoat for the rest of the rapists.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Marco Rubio and Rick Scott, and other Republican leaders have called on Ziegler to step down, but he has refused.

“Florida’s one of the most important states for the Republicans and we have to continue to bring home victories, especially for Rick Scott and the top of the ticket with Trump as our nominee, eventually.”

Under DeSantis, Florida has stripped rights away from LGBTQ+ Floridians and banned instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation in schools.

Bridget Ziegler also was appointed by DeSantis last year to the board of the governing district for Walt Disney World.

DeSantis and the GOP-controlled Florida Legislature last year took control of the district in retaliation after Disney publicly opposed a state law banning classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades.

The Sarasota Police Department is investigating the woman’s accusation that Ziegler raped her at her apartment in October.


The original article contains 514 words, the summary contains 148 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

A very small part of me wonders how close the vote was.

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Is it me, or is that font just a hair away from Comic Sans?

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Will they remove him so they can promote him to a higher office?