this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
493 points (95.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
342 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 371 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Heh, more of this shit.

Remember, the only reason we can still watch the highly influential 1922 vampire movie Nosferatu today is because some people didn't destroy all their copies despite a court saying they had to.

DISOBEY DESTRUCTION ORDERS.

COPY ALL THE THINGS.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 70 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The author in question here was pretty shitty. He wrote his own sequel to called "Fellowship of the King", and then sued Amazon and the Tolkien estate saying they stole elements from his book. He lost, and the Tolkien estate countersued.

The guy played stupid games and won stupid prizes.

[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I read. I don't have much sympathy for him. He sounds like a jerk.

IMO preserving the content is more important than honoring him (or, for that matter, humiliating him).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aubertlone@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hey this is a pretty interesting story, got a link?

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Some older dutch movies were released as rentals to the theaters that had to be returned after they stopped playing the movie. These copies were all destroyed and re-releases on DVD now look worse than what it looked like in movie theatres.

The good news is that some theatres hung on to some movies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 281 points 9 months ago (11 children)

In my opinion LotR should've already entered the public domain but thanks to Disney well have to wait until 2044 for that.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 97 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't have the already well-off children go without their steady income that they didn't have to work for...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 50 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Well how else are we supposed to encourage people to be related to people who develop intellectual property? It makes sense from a neponomic standpoint.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 32 points 9 months ago

Embracer is gonna be the next one to beg for an extension.

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 25 points 9 months ago (8 children)

It may as well be, they’re endorsing all sorts of shit content lately (like the Golem game, or the ring of power)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago

Don't worry, they'll manage to get it extended again before 2044.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Such optimism that it wont be extended again.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

You can't just extend copyright indefinitely. It's not like a patent, where you can make minute changes and claim it's a new product. The original works have a copyright limit of 95 years after the first date of publish (thanks Disney and other corporate lobbyists).

If we go by The Return of the King, it was published in 1955. That means the words, the story, the settings, and the characters will be public domain in 2050. Steamboat Willie, on the other hand, was published in 1928. That means it expires at the end of this year. Unless Disney can convince Congress to change copyright law again, these copyrights all have hard expiration dates.

ETA: Disney might have a case where they can claim copyright on the information they added or changed from the original works, just like how they can still claim copyright over Mickey after losing Steamboat Willie.

And I'm sure they will, because fuck society, amirite? /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Demand reform.

30 years from publication, no exceptions.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 128 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Look, I agree his works shouldn't be destroyed, just not monetizable.

But the dude poked a bear with a sharp stick... Suing the creators of the story/characters you've built your content on for copyright infringement? Brilliant move....

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

Right? Like I’d go write Harry Potter 8 and then sue WB lol that guy is nuts.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 95 points 9 months ago (29 children)

Copyright's explicit purpose is to encourage new works.

Any form of "unpublishing" is theft from the public. You wanna say a guy can't make money on a thing? Great, fine, go nuts. But nothing any human being put effort into deserves to be lost forever.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago

The author then filed suit against both Amazon and the Tolkien estate, claiming the streaming series “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” had borrowed from his sequel and infringed his copyright.

The gall.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 44 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tolkien Estate? What's that? People profiting off of the work of an author who has been dead for 50 years?

Copyright law is fucked up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

The only sane thing to do in response to this is the same thing that SHOULD have been done when Paramount went all sue happy on folks making unofficial Star Trek stuff.

Creators should stop making things related to their works and consumers should stop consuming and giving Paramount money for the official works.

The lesson being if the rights holder for something wants to keep it all to themselves, let them, forget it exists and starve it out of profitable existence. Spend the time and money with content, creators, and consumers that don't believe sucking up ever dime that's not nailed down is, or should be, the ultimate goal.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Did you even read the article? This dumbass wrote a book based on LotR characters and then HE tried to sue the Tolkien estate and Amazon. This person actually probably needs mental help if they think this could have worked, it was such an incredibly bad idea that there has to be some kind of mental health crises involved.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 24 points 9 months ago

Worth also mentioning the Tolkien estate is notoriously letigous. There are piracy sites that specifically ban Tolkiens works from being uploaded for that very reason.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

They plagiarized his fanfiction. Theoretically you would have rights to your stories even if they involve characters that you don't have rights to.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago

What was this guy thinking? He was clearly violating copyright.

Is he just soft in the head, or is he up to something us not crazy people can't see?

[–] KinNectar@kbin.run 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

More to the point, who's got a link so we can judge this fanfic for ourselves?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While this is piracy adjacent, good on Amazon and Tolkien's estate for shutting down that trash lol

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 47 points 9 months ago (8 children)

lol, Amazon's LOTR was trash.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

I don't even like Tolkien (find his writing to be just excessive, I don't need to know the color of the buttons on the shirt of the dead character with no name), and even I have to agree, lol.

Too many re-interpretations of authors' works. Tolkien is highly detailed - not reflecting that (or worse, substituting your own details) in a movie or show is just hubris. If you're so damn good why don't you write your own shit. Oh, your name doesn't sell instantly is why.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

So much money, just absolutely wasted.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Amazon should be sued for the Rings of Power

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I can’t really weigh in, as I couldn’t get more than 30 minutes into it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago

This guy was just deluded to think he was in the right or could win.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think it's okay to let this one go doesn't seem like there is any value in his work.

I do think it's time to open up the rights to older IPs and let the community make their own stories within universes though. I loved all the star wars EU stuff as a kid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XYZinferno@lemmy.basedcount.com 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the article itself makes me a lot less sympathetic towards the author than the headline would suggest, given he instigated this whole legal dispute on frankly idiotic premises.

load more comments
view more: next ›