this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
433 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
3641 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I know I shouldn't put too much weight onto what the numbers actually mean, but it's still weird to think we're only on version 6 after all this time.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I blame browsers for their out of control versioning.

Chrome is on version 118 now and gets a bump roughly every 6 months. Firefox is 4 years older, yet they started following the same rapid versioning at version 5 to "keep up" with Chrome which was already on version 12 but a younger browser.

[–] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 10 months ago

Their release cycle is rougly 1 month. Same with all other browsers. I know because I worked on a tool that had to keep up with browser versions.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Even more weird: Version 3 was released in 2011. In the same timespan we went from 2 -> 3 we went from 3 -> 6!

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 10 points 10 months ago

2011 is actually the same year Firefox started their rapid versioning to try and match Chrome. There was definitely a shift in versioning styles around then.

[–] mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago

!unexpectedfactorial

[–] na_th_an@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I still have my Firefox 3.0 Download Day PDF certificate.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yeah, windows are clearly ahead... bastards!

[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Rubbing it in our faces going from 95 all the way down to 11 too smh...

[–] chili1553@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Just for fun bro

[–] REdOG@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Im happy that I'll live through kernel of the beast times

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Snowplow8861@lemmus.org 146 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It's paraphrasing Torvalds himself though. It's a cheeky title.

"... and I have absolutely no excuses to delay the v6.6 release any more, so here it is,"

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 47 points 10 months ago

Actually, I think I have misread it. My bad. I'm the one running out of caffeine, it seems.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago

I could have sworn he has used this joke before? Like in the past year?

[–] creation7758@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Idk. I found it pretty funny

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"So this last week has been pretty calm, and I have absolutely no excuses to delay the v6.6 release any more, so here it is," Torvalds wrote early on Monday morning, as version 6.6 debuted as planned.

Among the highlights of the release are the KSMBD in-kernel server for the SMB networking protocol, which adds additional features for sharing files and improving inter-process communication in Linux, hopefully speeding I/O.

Speaking of AMD, early tests by the Linux-lovers at Phoronix found substantial performance gains for its manycore "Bergamo" CPUs thanks to the inclusion of the Earliest Eligible Virtual Deadline First (EEVDF) scheduler.

The kernel also added support for AMD's Dynamic Boost Control tech that allows users to tune Ryzen CPUs for optimal performance.

A change to this cut of the kernel rebrands it as just "SELinux" – a reaction to the Agency's role in ops that have harmed privacy, per Edward Snowden.

US-based contributors will also have a Thanksgiving-sized hole kicked in their schedules, making it possible work on this release will be slow and Torvalds could push it into early 2024.


The original article contains 506 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago

Two included contextual references got lost - "speaking of AMD" and "this cut of the kernel".

[–] alexyeahdude@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

I get that Linus is a superhero, but it's still so weird to me that this vital piece of the world's infrastructure relies on one man.