FooBarrington

joined 1 year ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Actually my cousin's friend Jeremy gave me a one-time pass as long as I don't tell his mom he threw rocks into Ms. Jones's garden, but aside from that I agree.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Doesn't everyone?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

IIUC USB-C puts less mechanical stress on the port and more on the cable connector, so instead of the port breaking the cable should break.

Circular connectors wouldn't be backwards-compatible either, and would be much harder to manufacture at the size of USB-C. I actually can't think of circular connectors with more than 2 data channels that can be plugged in in any rotation - do you have an example? All the ones I can think of (PS/2, XLR) have a set orientation.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

More like Notepad--, amirite

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago

Man, God of War Ragnarok was a fun game. Too bad they didn't want me to pay for it.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Have you never boiled your steak? It's delicious, and you get free steak water.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Could she just get away? It seems the monkey was moving freely, and a monkey can fuck you up pretty hard.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Who the fuck wants Carmilla of Styria to win. She'll never be satisfied, always clawing for more. There is no winning with her, only not having lost so far.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

If not for cat why cat shaped?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Fuck I just got that, nice!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's go with the Cambridge definition:

a perfect society in which people work well with each other and are happy

The Oxford Languages definition is incomplete enough to not be a valid counter argument - "perfect" doesn't mean everyone 100% gets what they want. The only sensible interpretation is "perfect" from a societal perspective.

289
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by FooBarrington@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
 

He's a little shithead, but we love him dearly.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

No, Utopia has a defined set of meanings. If current conditions meet someone's definition of Utopia, but doesn't meet the defined set of meanings, it doesn't mean current conditions are Utopia.

 

It doesn't stop. It just never stops.

 

I'm really interested in trying to get more information about Void, and one angle I haven't read much about is this: does the amount of people sacrificed, and their strength, influence the power of the resultant godhand member?

There definitely seems to be some kind of correlation between sacrifices and power, since Slan states in chapter 82: "It's ironic though. The stronger his life force and the greater his anguish, the more they become precious bread for the new life of darkness". From this we can at least deduct that a strong sacrifice makes the new member stronger than a weak sacrifice.

Now the question is: shouldn't this mean that Void is much, much more powerful than Griffith currently is? After all, he sacrificed not just a band of mercenaries (who have some very strong members, albeit only few due to the year before), but an entire kingdom. I do think the average sacrifice was much weaker for Void (as they were most likely not warriors, but intellectuals), though it's difficult to say since we know very little about his eclipse. But nonetheless I definitely think there is some correlation here.

This of course leads to some interesting possibilities for what Griffith is currently up to. Is he planning to somehow ascend further by making another, much bigger sacrifice? Do the godhand members have a hierarchy which he is trying to climb (almost certainly)? Could he be trying to surpass the Idea of Evil itself?

 

I'm re-reading the manga right now. During the Eclipse, we see the brand placed on a number of hawks, each in a different place (link to the panel):

  • Casca gets it on the left side of her chest, roughly over her heart

  • Guts, of course, has it on his neck

  • Judeau gets his on the palm of his left hand

  • Pippin has it on his forearm

  • Corkus gets his on his forehead (just like the bodies below the tower of rebirth)

I can make an argument for each of them to have gotten it on whatever they most rely on, except for Guts, I can't make a concrete argument why it's his neck.

But what I'm really interested in is this: can we learn anything about the bodies from Gaiserics kingdom from this? It might be that the population of his city wasn't made up of fighters and physical people at the time it was sacrificed, but of thinkers, or at least people who rely more on wit and cunning than on strength (positive or negative). This would make sense considering the technological and social advancements they seem to have made.

What do you guys think?

 

Everyone has something they can't stop themselves from nerding out over - but often it's hard to find people to talk to about it. So go ahead, share your interests, and tell us about them!

view more: next ›