this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
193 points (93.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35764 readers
481 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I often wonder how the general population will react when they truly realize the impacts of climate change. I'd imagine there could be three reactions:

  • Apathy, as in completely shutting down
  • Panic, as in severe mental breakdown
  • Action, protesting etc

Now that I think of it these are the fight, flight, freeze reactions. Any thoughts?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neon_Dystopia@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 year ago

There will never be some collective epiphany that turns everyone into a climate activist, so business as usual.

[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] fluke@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Don't look up.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago

This is where we are now and I don't see it changing.

The weather here is fucked. It's really different to 10 years ago, before that it was pretty much the same.

We get massive heat waves and record breaking temps every year. The once in a decade major storms now happen several times a year. We hardly get snow in parts of the country that used to get it every year.

We're only mildly affected compared to many places.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatives will never admit they are wrong if that’s what you’re asking.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh man, just wait till they pin it on the libtards causing crop failures and storms and flooding all because they didn't persecute people enough and didn't hand out enough free money to billionaires.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Dealing with it.

Weather gets hotter, more people get A/C. Disasters get more frequent, more people get fucked by disasters.

Areas become less habitable, some people die, some people deal, some people flee. Migration gets more pressing? Borders get closed with increasingly violent measures.

We just had inflation make life 10% more expensive in many countries. Life went on. That's about the impact of climate change people in "rich" western countries can expect from climate change, except it will happen more slowly.

As much as climate doomers would hope for collapse, climate change is a slow moving disaster. Humans are adaptable, especially when there is time to adapt. Even the more pessimistic among the realistic/scientific predictions are on the "life will get X% worse" side, not "doom, we all die, no food no water" side.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This ignores how interconnected our logistics is on a global scale. As other nations devolve into war, not only between themselves but against the west as well of we try to stop the migration, the world logistics will get severely disrupted, from food, to resources, to everything else. How will that look?

The west is not immune to serious consequences, and it is very likely we will see living conditions severely worsen to the point of mass unrest as well. The chaos very much will end up being global.

You mentioned the high inflation, and that "life goes on".. but does it? Or does it push more and more people to the breaking point, leading to more and more dysfunctional societies, planting the seeds for serious future unrest?

These things do happen over long periods.. but they do happen. I won't pretend to know how the future will look like, but it is far too early to say that things turned out fine.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People will slip from denial to acceptance because, by the time the vast majority of people realise it's as bad as the scientists have been saying, it'll be far too late to do anything other than scramble for the last rocketship off the planet.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To where? Like where you gonna go that is more suitable than where we already are? You gonna rocketship your ass to Mars? Cause even with global warming earth is still more hospitable than a rocky desert with no oxygen. A bigass bank account with lots of zeros isn't gonna keep anyone out of the we're collectively fucked line. Sure it might get you a spot at the back of the line, but we're all getting in it together no matter who you are.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To New Zealand, apparently: "New Zealand, Iceland, the UK, Tasmania and Ireland are the places best suited to survive a global collapse of society, according to a study"

[–] Sarm_8@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I guarantee we'll all be underwater before you can get to us

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 26 points 1 year ago

Well billions of people will die, but not likely the ones reading this. The ones reading this will quietly keep the others from getting where we’re kept safer.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Denial that humans have anything to do with it.

Severe crackdown on any sort of migration, which of course is incompatible with liberal democracies, so they’ll be replaced by autocracies of various sorts.

If you look closely, it’s already happening.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Oligarchs funding a resurgence of fascism in order to protect the global system that is wrecking the environment, successfully it seems.

[–] sheppard@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Controlling who can come and settle doesn't make a state authoritarian.

Current day Switzerland is not Nazi Germany.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m primarily talking about pushbacks.

But any state that claims to protect human rights also must have a way to get asylum.

Missing that, it’s in violation of international law and any liberal constitution that was formulated with the idea of human rights.

This is what democratic parties are unable to do, and in response we see all over the West the rise of right wing populist and extremist parties. Once in power they move to change the judicial system so they can unhindered crack down on human rights. of course they don’t stop with the crack down on migrants. The next group is always the gays, along with critical journalists. That doesn’t instantly instantiate tHe nAzIs, but it is an autocratic system where human rights are no concern to the whims of the political leadership.

I don’t know how far along Switzerland is in this process, but given that we see this happening basically all over Europe and in the US it’s hard to imagine that it’s not happening there.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

It's going to be so hard not to deck the person who will eventually say "it was all a part of God's plan"

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 23 points 1 year ago

Probably a lot of people are going to be like "why didn't anyone do anything about this????", completely forgetting that's happening right now, with likely the same people being climate deniers.

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Revolutions happen, they happen fast, and then they spread.

And right before, even though everyone is angry, they also swear its impossible. That the ~~king~~ capitalist state can't be defeated.

[–] IntrepidIceIgloo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Consequences are happening now, cat 5 hurricane hit Acapulco Mexico and destroyed the city.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I'm doing all three every day. doom scrolling intensifies

Really, I think you nailed it as far as the three categories of reactions go. Of course, the manifestations will be as varied as humans are.

I'm working towards building intentional community that's equipped to help it's members and hopefully neighbors to get through. But that's because I'm a super-privileged north american who is located in what I consider one of the least-likely-to-be-unlivable spots. Other than the unpleasantness of the collapse of society, I'm just hoping that climate refugees don't decide to come murder us all for our resources.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For the vast majority of (American) people, their reaction to the true realization of climate change is going to be one of:

  1. gurgle, gulp, drowning noises
  2. ah, oh no, gunshots, silence
  3. so hot today, ugh, sound of body hitting ground, silence
  4. "That fire isn't so close yet!" burning sounds, screaming, silence
[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or as we call it in America, Tuesday. It's already here, people don't realize it. People already have acclimated to "wildfire season," for example, a thing that didn't exist until the last 5 years or so in this area, as a totally normal occurrence.

Gotta remind myself I grew up in a doomsday cult and most people didn't have go bags in their garage their entire childhood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First-world countries will be able to afford relocating farmland, building sea walls, and otherwise mitigating the effects of climate change. Once that gets too expensive, they will resort to geoengineering like deliberately releasing large amounts of sulfur into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight or crushing rock to speed up chemical weathering that traps atmospheric carbon dioxide as limestone. People might wish that they had reduced carbon dioxide output in the past, but reducing carbon dioxide output in the present will remain unappealing. Even the absolute worst-case scenario, a return to the climate of the Cretaceous period when all the world's ice had melted and large regions of the continents (not just the coasts) were flooded, would not be the end of technological civilization.

People in poorer countries will not be able to afford such mitigation but their suffering will be largely irrelevant to global climate policy.

During this whole time almost no one denying climate change now will admit to making a mistake.

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

People will just slowly move to northerner places. When those get back, they'll move again. Lots of borders will close. There will be some wars over the likes of Siberia but they won't last.

Eventually people will run out of places to go too up norther, and they'll just deny the existence of an issue.

[–] endlessmeddler@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Action
  2. Apathy
  3. Panic

We are in the apathy stage right now.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, when did the action happen??

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the neat part - it didn't!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

You ever heard of the boiling frog analogy? Yeah, that.

[–] Rocky60@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Line from Unforgiven

Kid, “He had it coming, didn’t he?”

Muny, “We’ve all got it coming, kid”

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Chaos. Pandemonium. Mayhem.

By the time we're feeling the full effects, it's too late to mute them. We need to be acting now. and I think the general population knows it. Even if they're unwilling to mutter the words 'climate change' or 'global warming' or admit that it's a problem.
Like a conversation I had with my grandma:
"it's so weird. we've had... [sites really weird weather that's happening local to her]..."
"You think that might be because the climate is changing?"
"No! climates don't change- .... "

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think were gonna see climate wars kick off before any kind of mass realization happens.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we're already starting to see some climate wars kick off.

they don't call them as such, as yet. but I think resources are definitely becoming an issue.

Oh yeah, the climate wars will absolutely start before we even know they are the climate wars, that's basically a fact.

[–] Borkingheck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

One of the real issues that people will see the immediate impacts of is increased migration. People will not be able to live in coastal areas, Pacific Islands or near the equator.

It's already happened in S.America with convoys of people on foot trying to get to better places but the spin has always been these are illegals and nothing more.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

When Americans do? Shut the border to climate change refugees. Keep on trucking.

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Normalcy bias for sure. Just like at the start of covid.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Eventually the gulf stream will collapse causing a mini-ice age, making northern Europe comparatively cold to the Pacific North West, for one, moving the arable/habitable band down towards Africa.

After that? Who knows honestly.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Apathy. It's already going full swing.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we can already seethe consequences. Not fully, maybe, but we do. So whatever people are dping right now: some would be spurred to action, some will panic, some will go to denial nd act as kf all is as it should be (or as you called it, apathy). And some will try their hardest to make as much money as possible while they can despite the consequences.

[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Europeans will migrate to the highest point in Europe - Switzerland. You guys are literally Europe's lifeboat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We already do where I work since we do a bunch of infrastructure work. It is simple enough, keep dealing with it. Size motors bigger so they can deal with heat, add cooling to control systems, waterproof sensors because of flooding. Just going to keep dealing with a hotter wetter world.

[–] willis936@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
  1. Lots of wars and refugee crises.
  2. Almost certainly unilateral moves by middle-sized nations seeing existential crises to inject albedo-altering aerosols into the stratosphere.
  3. Depending on the timing of things in the next few decades we may be in an ice age very quickly from ice cap melt acceleration cooling the ocean. In an ice age the amount of arable land would dramatically decrease and if there is a harvest season at all it will be very short. Nearly everyone would starve.
load more comments
view more: next ›