this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1386 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59671 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/6745228

TLDR: Apple wants to keep china happy, Stewart was going after china in some way, Apple said don’t, Stewart walked, the show is dead.

Not surprising at all, but sad and shitty and definitely reduces my loyalty to the platform. Hosting Stewart seemed like a real power play from Apple, where conflict like this was inevitable, but they were basically saying, yes we know, but we believe in things and, as a big company with deep pockets that can therefore take risks, to prove it we’re hosting this show.

Changing their minds like this is worse than ever hosting the show in the first place as it shows they probably don’t know what they’re doing or believe in at all, like any big company, and just going for what seems cool, and undermining the very idea of a company like Apple running a streaming platform. I wonder if the Morning Show/Wars people are paying close attention.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 328 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bummer. That’s some weak and feckless megacorp bullshit. Just like something Stewart would cover, which is why this show was such a great power move. And yet? Infinite profit over all else, so never mind.

Look at John Oliver, he talks shit about HBO constantly. Do they care? Nope, because he has more Emmys than anyone could know what to do with. Respect your talent and reap the rewards. Pretty basic stuff, Apple.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

The difference is HBO is a media company that largely operates in the US, and Jon Oliver making fun of them isn’t going to hurt their business at all. Apple is a hardware company that also makes media. And selling hardware in China is critical to their business. Since the CCP owns China, they can get their panties in a twist and just ban Apple. Like they did with government devices.

As a publicly owned company they have a legal responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders. It’s the same reason why Twitter had to agree to the sale to Elon Musk and why they had to force it. It was a terrible move overall but since Elon was buying all outstanding shares and taking it private, the board literally had no legal choice but to take it since he was offering well over market value.

Public companies don’t get to take moral stands when there’s money on the line. They legally have to put shareholders first.

[–] Whatisawaffle@kbin.social 170 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

"Public companies...legally have to put shareholders first."

I thought this too, but it is apparently a myth.

"There is a common belief that corporate directors have a legal duty to maximize corporate profits and “shareholder value” — even if this means skirting ethical rules, damaging the environment or harming employees. But this belief is utterly false.

To quote the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in the recent Hobby Lobby case: “Modern corporate law does not require for-profit corporations to pursue profit at the expense of everything else, and many do not.”

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-corporations-obligations-to-shareholders/corporations-dont-have-to-maximize-profits

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Specifically, the thing that is wrong is the idea that the only way to uphold their fiduciary duty to shareholders is to maximize profit. They have a legal obligation to put their shareholders' interest first, and maximizing short term profit is not the only way to do this. Benefit corps give some of their revenue to a cause, sometimes companies invest in long-term stability or profitability.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s the same reason why Twitter had to agree to the sale to Elon Musk and why they had to force it. It was a terrible move overall but since Elon was buying all outstanding shares and taking it private, the board literally had no legal choice but to take it since he was offering well over market value.

It was put to an actual shareholder vote. The individual shareholders voted yes because he was overpaying. The board was fundamentally irrelevant.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Where’d did this “legal responsibility to maximize profit” bullshit come form?

There is no such law, an no entity to enforce the responsibility.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 191 points 1 year ago (3 children)

definitely reduces my loyalty to the platform

You are either paying the subscription or not, your inner states mean nothing to them or us.

[–] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can think of an old great daily news show that still doesnt have a permanent host... please!!!..

Or run for president.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've been saying, "Stewart for President" for decades now. He is perfect for the job. He would never want that job, which I just see as further qualification.

[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He fought congress for two fucking decades for 9/11 first responders and the families to get paid, he comes more than prepared to every talk, and he's not afraid to shut someone down and call out bullshit.

I'd say he's over qualified for work in politics

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukraine got their version of Jon Stewart to become their president and he's successfully fighting off a Russian invasion. Sounds like an endorsement to me.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Jon Stewart 2024 "It worked for Ukraine"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (49 children)

"Let's talk about all the cheap Chinese labour that Apple uses despite being the 10th richest company in the world."

"Let's not."

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 124 points 1 year ago (9 children)

reduces my loyalty to the platform

Why the fuck would you have any loyalty to Apple? They sure as shit don't have any loyalty to their customers. In fact they piss in the face of their customers and tell them it's raining.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 48 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Apple has setup their walled garden in such a way that you're basically all-in or all-out of their ecosystem. I don't know that they have brand loyalty as much as they have a captive audience that they can sell iWhatever to over and over again.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Insert South Park Disney Mickey Mouse China meme

Big props to John for walking away.

[–] AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

How did Apple not see this coming up as future conflict with it's talent. Its almost like they didn't watch the fucking show, or the causes he devoted himself to after retiring. It's a rare thing I know, but not everyone can be bought. His entire platform that he's built up over the years, would have collapsed if he had pulled a John Cena.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 0xb@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

Let this be the regular reminder that any time that a gigantic for profit corporation seems to be doing the right thing it's a mere coincidence and they are following their bottom line. The moment those two depart, they will look after their bottom line right thing be damned. There are no moral corporations.

Maybe those good things they do while are convenient to them are moral and bring real benefits and can be followed and celebrated, but ultimately they are a convenient mask to trick customers. So don't ever be loyal to a brand, be loyal to principles.

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

But I thought Apple was the good guy, looking out for us folk and doing privacy-focused things!

What? That's just marketing garbage? Nah, surely Apple wouldn't just be a shitty company just like everyone else. Better buy some more overpriced products to support them!

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The privacy thing was always hiding the real truth. Apple will never be able to compete with Google on ads or tracking: they have neither the engineering chops nor the reach. By being "privacy first", it saves Apple money and cuts off a little of Google's revenue stream.

The benefit to customers was a secondary effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Canceling Apple TV over this, knew they were spineless, but this is pathetic since it’s one of the few shows I watch on it. Growing really tired of all these service subscriptions as it is.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn that’s a real shame, no surprise Jon walked out. That man actually has standards, he don’t need the money he was there because he cared and wanted to put out a positive voice that analyzed the bullshit we all have to deal with and his platform enabled that perfectly, just like his work for vets and burn pits.

I hope he transitions elsewhere but keeps the content as-is

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

don't forget his battle with Congress to fund the 9-11 Emergency Responders

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago

Because we all know how easy it is to silence Jon Stewart.

Something tells me he could get more funding for a show with a gofundme than Apple+ is authorized to spend.

[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Meh, realistically I don't think Jon does it because he needs money.

He seems like the kind of person who does things because it's the right thing to do. So taking away his platform isn't going to make him go away or shut him up.

It might take a while for him to get another one but I'm confident this guy will be on his deathbed telling people in power they suck & should do better.

We need more people like him

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We are in a dystopian future, where cooperate interests trump reporting.

Independence or the free media does not exist anymore, they are all governed by the economic interests of the 1%. Democracy is hereby dead, and nobody is fighting to save it anymore.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democracy offically died in America the day Citizens United was approved by the Supreme Court.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Say it with me everyone - CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to The Hollywood Reporter, ahead of its decision to end The Problem, Apple approached Stewart directly and expressed its need for the host and his team to be “aligned” with the company’s views on topics discussed. Rather than falling in line when Apple threatened to cancel the show, Stewart reportedly decided to walk.

Good for Jon Stewart. He held the line even when the money people demanded that he compromise. Maybe a VP pic. I could see it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is something particularly amusing and very ironic that a mega-corp like Apple, the most valuable company in the world, is standing up to defend a communist dictatorship and won't accept any dissent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apple tv sucks anyway. I'd like to remind people that it's near the end of the mls season and they still have no android mobile app. They actively piss on anyone not totally in line with their ecosystem, etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

another reminder that apple's "privacy, that's iPhone" is a marketing gimmick. they profit from surveillance and censorship in China^1^. elsewhere, this catchphrase has allowed them to suck Facebook's as revenue into their growing ad business, surpassing even tiktok in terms of ad revenue^2^.

they'll happily do pink washing, but will try everything do dilute labour rights^3^.

so, apple is just your average big tech. nothing exceptional about them(except for them suing regular people to oblivion^4^).


in case of hitting a paywall, either disable JavaScript, or use bypass paywalls clean.
1: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-censorship-data.html
2: https://finshots.in/archive/apple-is-an-advertising-giant-almost/
3: a simple search result would lead you to many such cases: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+labour+rights&ia=web
4: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/11/technology/apple-trademarks.html

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Looks like I'm going to continue not watching Apple TV for the foreseeable future.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

Changing their minds...shows they probably don’t know what they’re doing or believe in at all

undermining the very idea of a company like Apple running a streaming platform

I'm not sure in what way it was suggested that Apple was "different", but to clarify, companies don't do things for "ideas" they do things for profit. If it increases that profit, they "believe" in it, and if it doesn't, they'll kick it to the curb.

And not only is Apple no different than any other company in that respect, they are pretty much the top-tier example of it. They're a $2 trillion company, the biggest in the world. They didn't get to that point focusing on the greater good. Nothing is more important to them than their profit.

[–] stagen@feddit.dk 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope he moves to a different platform, one that's not so beholden to the Chinese audience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Apple has always sucked Winnie's balls.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Cancelled my Apple TV just now. Really enjoyed the show and not a ton of other content on there that actually came with the sub. If I’m going to have to pay anyway and you’re not supporting your good shows then what’s the point.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 year ago

I didn't think my opinion of Apple could go any lower but I guess I was wrong.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Never gonna happen, unfortunately. He's already said he won't run for office, because he feels he does more useful work from outside the system, asking the uncomfortable questions that need asking, until he gets an answer.

Don't get me wrong. I'd vote for Stewart for any office. I just know enough about the man to know that he refuses to run. He gets asked pretty regularly about it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I would subscribe to him if he moved to patreon.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I’m seeing a lot of anonymous quotes and assumptions but not a lot of verifiable facts. Sure, creative differences may have existed, but did any meaningful number of people watch the show? Even in online communities dedicated to Apple TV specifically I can’t recall seeing anything other than perfunctory mentions. Nobody ever actually talked about this show. I feel like the show was probably already on thin ice with a questionable ROI, and some likely not terribly sensational disagreement pushed it over the edge. Makes more sense than Apple caring what he says about AI, since they’ve pointedly avoided the embarrassing hype train, and clearly aren’t going to engage in the sort of exploitative “all of your documents are now our training corpus” nonsense that he’s likely to actually criticize.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Jon Stewart is a national treasure.

[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

i would totally help crowdfund a jon stewart show

load more comments
view more: next ›