this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
1160 points (98.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35977 readers
1391 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kaelygon@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This could mean that OP has either +100 usb chargers, or a fraction of a non-USB-C charger

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

a cord that was cut lengthwise

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

USB-C will be destroyed by Romulans and next we will have USB-D.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

USB-D's NUTS

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Actually the EU is forcing standardization of electronic devices.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

USB-C2(1)_new_final

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

USB 2x3 v5 2.2+ 3.1

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

At least usb-a3 works with previous ports

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

USB-C2 is four fold symmetric

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

USB-D will be round again

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most devices are still on USB 3.1, so there is a room for growth.

That being said, newest USB protocol supports 240w charging and 20gbps transfer rates. It's good even for next generation laptops, not even talking about phones

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago

I'd say a lot of devices are fine on USB2 or even 1

Some things don't need much

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that being said, there is no standard indicator for ports, chargers, and cables to signify what charging speed they support.

Sure, usb c can technically do 240W, but most people use crappy chinese cables which will do max 5W and blame it on the usb specification

[–] tehfishman@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd argue that they're partially right (or at least not entirely wrong) to blame the specification. If the specification makes it easy for crappy manufactures to be crappy, then the specification probably should have planned for that in a better way. And crappy manufactures being crappy is a tale as old as manufacture. Yeah I know there are cable marking requirements, but clearly nobody gives a flying fuck. The USB IF has basically all of the power in this situation, and their members collectively control a significant percentage of the planets wealth, so it's actually their problem to solve.

[–] Tum@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

And crappy manufacturers being crappy is a tale as old as manufacture.

Ea Nasir catching hate still it seems.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

I liked the old chargers. It was like you were stabbing the electricity into them.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

If companies can stop cheaping out on their USB-C ports that'd be cool.

[–] Afflictedlife@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago

And there will be a bunch of those neat little adapters on aliexpress soon after

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Nah, USB-C is plagued by non-standard electrical configurations, non-standard charging protocols, and non-compliant cables. Rest assured the connector is here to stay, your device just may not be able to charge with any given charger or cable.

[–] deepus@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I dont get how so many people complain about broken usb c connectors. Im not saying your wrong, just ive used the same 2 chargers for my phone for the last 5 years and same 1 for my laptop for 3 years, and yeah theyve gotten slightly looser but not to the point of breaking and being usable

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

The USB type C connector itself is amazing. I've never broken the physical connector, the problem is electrical only. The connector is capable of delivering a very high 240W of power, but the device/charger negotiate the power and voltage requirements to find the highest both can support.

But there are actually four parts of the system limiting the negotiated power:

  • The maximum power the charger can deliver
  • The maximum power the charging device can receive
  • The maximum current the cable can deliver
  • The signaling protocol used to negotiate the highest supported power across the link

The problem ultimately comes from the negotiation as many devices don't use USB-PD (the theoretical "standard" for this) to save cost or allow different electrical configurations. This can lead to chargers incorrectly identifying devices as capable of accepting higher voltages than they can. Or devices can incorrectly identify themselves as capable of accepting higher voltage than they actually can.

If you're using reputable decides from reputable companies using the included charger/cables, this will never be an issue. It's only problematic when you want one charger for all your USB type C devices, as it now needs to support multiple communication protocols and voltage standards, hoping that no device identifies itself incorrectly.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›