this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
371 points (96.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32981 readers
5901 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

top or bottom doesnt matter, whats important is that you PIVOT!

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 minutes ago

It already looked like bottom on first glance, The shadows and light seem to verify it.

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 7 points 55 minutes ago (1 children)

How are y'all arguing this? The banister makes it unquestionably obvious that it's at the top. There's no debate to be had here unless the banister was intentionally installed wrong just for the purpose of this meme, which would be crazy.

The mattress is at the top, y'all.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

So the people walk on the wall? (Wear of the carpet and lack of visible ledge that stairs should have)

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 points 25 minutes ago

My stairs don't have a visible ledge. I don't know why people are acting like that's standard. I think only one of the homes I've lived in has had a stairwell with ledges.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 hour ago

Bottom, look at the wear of the carpet, lots of people have walked here.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It’s white and gold!

All joking aside, most stairs that I know had some sort of overhang, which we don’t see in this picture, so I’ll venture to say that we are looking down. The mattress is at the bottom of the stairs.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

Bottom, these stairs have a rounded lip to make them compliant with rise over run requirements in limited space.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Top. Stairs aren't that tall.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

While I'm not 100% certain it's not just confusing perspective, it does appear that the slope rise is shorter than the run, suggesting that this is from the top of the stairs.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

Nice catch. The carpet wear corroborates this.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 37 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think the railing gives it away.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corigan@lemmy.zip 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Top the railing gives it away

[–] gurnu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And if you actually think for a moment you realize nobody carpets vertical parts of the steps

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

They absolutely do, and you're arguing for the opposite position of the person above you

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 118 points 16 hours ago (20 children)

bottom, as we only can see the treads not the risers (that small inset underneath a step).

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The handrail argument doesn't make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the handrail mount is sideways if we're looking down; if we're looking up, it makes sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

It's the top of the stairs because in the top left of thr image you can see the banister support. If the mattresses were at the bottom then the angle of that support would be different

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 hours ago

Some stairs don't have different looking risers, but you're still correct because you can see wear marks from steps on the carpet.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Bottom. Angle isn’t right to be the top.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 47 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I have those stairs with that carpet.

💯% this is looking down to a mattress at the bottom of the stairs.

Conclusive evidence:
Looking Down

Looking Up

(Sorry I was too lazy to get the low perspective)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not convinced. It's a different set of stairs and a different carpet. I have had stairs with a carpet more similar to the OP that did not have a riser. See elsewhere in these comments for a photo of these stairs, now bare. In the distant past, they were carpeted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

The biggest factor IMO is something no one mentioned yet: we can only see one face of each step (either the top or the wall). If a photo is taken from the bottom, we would almost always be able to see the tops of the first few steps, which isn't visible here. If a photo is taken from the top, the walls would pretty much never be visible (if they were, you could also see the photographer's feet).

Therefore, this photo is only consistent with a photo taken from the top.

It is possible that this is an extremely long flight of stairs or that the photo was taken from a deliberately deceptive angle, but if that's the case I have to say it was expertly done, because I am CERTAIN that we are looking from the top and the mattress is at the bottom.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thought something was weird here. The contrast and colour is making it difficult. If you turn up shadows it changes the entire feeling, including where the obvious light source is. I wouldn't expect the dark side of the mattress unless there was a bright light directly above it.

Also the banister/handrail arm wouldn't be horizontal. Most importantly, congrats, you got me invested.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

No, the light could still be above the mattress on the ceiling at the bottom of the stairwell. This proves nothing.

But, the wear on the carpet indicates to me that those are the treads, so this is taken from the top of the stairs looking down. Also, not mentioned elsewhere, there is usually a nose on the treads and the carpet would follow the nose, which can't be seen from above.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 30 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Bottom, we can see dust and debris accumulated on the "run" part of the steps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Plot twist: Stuck in the middle.

[–] Cooljimy84@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

From the wear patten on the carpet I would say bottom, but the handle to the side makes me think top !....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 19 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

top. you can see part of the handrail on the top left of the picture

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Edit: It doesn't matter, the mattress is making an impossible shape/bend... It's definitely AI generated... Even if it was two separate mattresses, it still wouldn't make sense...

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Might be one of these mattresses with a "break" in the middle so they fold better.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 6 points 5 hours ago

Foam mattress? Broken mattress?

My mattress easily bends like that. Most modern ones do

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Bottom.

  1. The risers on the stairs are not visible.

  2. The wear on the carpet goes right to the edge. That's consistent with people stepping on it, not kicking it on the way up.

  3. If it's at the top, the mattress doesn't appear to have any of its weight resting on a step. It could be so wedged in that it's being held in place, and that it was wedged that way by someone awkwardly pushing at the ends of it in a way that wouldn't seem to give them enough leverage to do that. But the obvious explanation is more likely, that it's at the bottom of the stairs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I think it is the bottom of the top of the stairs because of the lighting to the bottom left of the mattress. That should be in shadow from the mattress if it was at the bottom of the stairs.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Definitely the bottom of the top. Or is it the top of the bottom?

[–] WhyIAughta@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Not if the mattress is coming in from an outside door. That light could be daylight. In fact I believe this to be the case.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›