this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
476 points (96.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33004 readers
5687 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 142 points 1 day ago (6 children)

bottom, as we only can see the treads not the risers (that small inset underneath a step).

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The handrail argument doesn't make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, the handrail mount is sideways if we're looking down; if we're looking up, it makes sense.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] seekpie@lemmy.seekpie.nohost.me 3 points 5 hours ago

Probably. To me it looks like the mattress is lit from said light.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister.

The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

~~This is what gets me confused. If we're at the top, I see the banister mount turning horizontal, not up. Up from that POV would be towards the viewer, but it's angled away which would be horizontal. We have to be looking from the bottom for it to be turning up in this photo. I have no idea how hundreds of people look at that and say it's turning up~~.

E: nevermind, the question asked where the mattress is, not where I am looking from. 🤣

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's the top of the stairs because in the top left of thr image you can see the banister support. If the mattresses were at the bottom then the angle of that support would be different

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Why is no one else talking about this.

There's no debate. It's at the top of the stairs.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

when the mattress is at the top, where is gravity and on what is it resting?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

You think a folded in half mattress could get stuck in a stairwell? You might be on to something!

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I think it might actually be held up by the other end of that banister.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it's bottom too but I don't agree with your reasoning, I've seen steps without that bit.

Edit: actually now I think top, I've been convinced by the daylight argument plus the realization that is a single mattress folded in half (I previously thought it's two mattresses).

Edit: changed my mind again, made a top level comment

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How does the single mattress in half bit make you think it's at the top? If it were at the top, the force of the mattress trying to straighten itself out would push it down the stairs. Much more likely the mattress was pushed/ tossed/ fell down the stairs and got folded in that position, imo.

Edit: the shadows are also indicative of it being at the bottom: light source from above and and from the sides at the base of the stairs, either from an open door or window. Shadow cast from the door light source being cancelled by the light source from above the stairs.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back when I thought it was two mattresses, I thought it couldn't be at the top because the right mattress probably wouldn't be held up like that. But since it's one mattress, it can relatively easily be held at that angle with most of its weight resting on the step.

And that's my main reason: it really seems like the mattress is being pushed towards that step, and I believe it's being pushed by gravity. Doesn't make as much sense for it to be pushed in that direction by someone.

I'm not married to it though, it's a really tricky picture.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna lie, you've got me rethinking my position pointing out the right side of it. I do think though, that if it were at the top and resting on the one step, that the corner of the mattress resting on the step would be bowed in a bit more.

It is quite tricky.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 hours ago

Yeah. I've now found a reason that makes me convinced the mattress is at the bottom. I made a top level comment about it.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago

Some stairs don't have different looking risers, but you're still correct because you can see wear marks from steps on the carpet.

[–] franzcoz@feddit.cl 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what I was thinking too

[–] Dolphinfreetuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's code for anything built during the age of home electricity.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, my house has electricity and the stairs do not have that indentation at all. I could take a picture of the steps from the bottom or the top and aside from the wear marks on the treads, you can’t see a difference.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

built during

When was your home built?

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Well after the beginning of the age of home electrification, but I’m not sure precisely. I’m renting my current house.

I don’t think any of my stairs have had such an exaggerated ledge of the tread like the picture in this thread. In my previous house (owned, built in 2000 something) it just had a little bump nailed on to the edge, but it was symmetric on both the tread and riser.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

3/4" min to 1-1/4" max is code, with a 9/16" nosing. No nose is doable, but with a min step depth of 11", generally youre not seeing that outside of commercial spaces (and typically concrete).

Not sure where you are (or if your stairs are even up to code), but that's what they are referring to.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. Does that “nose” count if the riser is slanted? Maybe I’m just not seeing what I’m expecting, but there is space because the riser isn’t perfectly vertical, now that I’m looking.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It shouldn't be slanted, I'm going to go with "not to code", or your local building code didn't adopt IRC for stairs.

(At least for the slant I'm picturing in my head it would not be to code)

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

its simply code where I live and my old home where I grew up was already old AF and had those risers and treads (albeit not as deep as they should have been, I always tripped)

[–] M137@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Never lived in a house, only apartments with no stairs (inside the apartments) and this is obvious even to me. You can know something without ever having owned or lived with that thing.