this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
408 points (97.2% liked)

politics

24624 readers
3353 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Next up is a bill to shoot every remaining unicorn

[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

I haven’t read the article or comments yet. Just the post title. I am afraid of the amount of brain cells I am about to lose. I’m going in, will update in a moment.

Edit: what the fuck did I just read. A new bill to stop a conspiracy theory? MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

Her voters are dumber than she is.

That's how she is still in office.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Could the bill be used to base measures on that help combat climate change? Sometimes idiots are actually useful.

[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Could it? Possibly. Would it? Probably not. At least not with big daddi T/ republicans in office. They deny the effects of pollutants in the atmosphere so there is no weather modification taking place (according to them). Considering that trump is taking away tax credits for solar and wind and is increasing leasing and tax credits for oil, gas, and coal industries I don’t think this bill will provide much benefit for the climate

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they'll unintentionally outlaw pollution like when the Republicans accidentally legalized cannabis in 2018

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Sadly, all it will take is some CEO to publicly state "I didn't intend to pollute the environment. I dumped dangerous chemicals into nature because I wanted more money. Yes, I knew my actions would modify the weather, as this legislation states. But that was not my express purpose. My purpose was to be able to afford my 17th yacht so my peers would accept me."

Perfectly legal.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Are they literally just laying the groundwork to frame Democrats for weather modifications so they can blame all of climate change on us and create a modern day witch hunt? Seriously? How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

[–] III@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

The American "education" system... that's how. Conservatives paid good money over the decades to build this level of general stupidity.

[–] Thermite@lemmings.world 17 points 1 day ago

Does this make "Rollin' coal" illegal?

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Go get 'em, Marge. Champion of the dummies.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago

Geoengineering… like fracking?

Or like building man-made lakes and tunnels? What about digging a pool in my backyard?

[–] SpecialSetOfSieves@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Would this... proposed legislation... mean that SpaceX will now be prohibited from flooding LEO with Starlink comsats?

Loading the upper atmosphere with ozone-destroying aluminum and other heavy metals as those things fall out of orbit, not to mention rapidly increasing light and RF pollution, definitely qualify as an uncontrolled geoengineering experiment, albeit one whose effects were known before launch. I could go on about the deleterious effects of these orbiting swarms, but - the ball's in your court, Congresswoman Greene.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 15 hours ago

They will be happy to ban space exploration actually. Half of them believe there is a firmament there anyway.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

All this is gonna stop is cloud seeding, since that is literally the only way in which we manipulate the weather.

Well... On purpose, I mean. If this has the side effect of outlawing all greenhouse emissions because it's altering the weather in form of making shit hotter, that's a win.

Edit: Also I am reminded of the time some PR lady for HAARP said the array can manipulate the weather because, technically, it could punch a hole in clouds directly above it. Which I thought was just stupid, even as a joke, because they were trying to squash the rumors that it was some kind of hurricane machine.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

You know it ain't. This is her trying to ban some conspiracy theory non existent weather device, just like the space laser she was crying about a couple years ago.

What's the worst that can happen, farmers face droughts and companies can't allow relief due to legality so the crops just die and we have food shortages? I mean that just hurts the farmers and the non-rich... So no fucks they will give

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh for fucks sake…. How can one woman be some incredibly dense?

She probably heard somewhere that is why there were flash floods in Texas because some evil genius is punishing “real Americans”.

The ironic thing is the GOP constant bashing of clean, renewable energy and promoting fossil fuels and coal really is affecting the weather, just not in a very predictable or controlled way.

[–] III@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

This is the same moron that has long believed that the Jews control space lasers that manipulate the weather.

I am surprised it took her this long to make a move.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean who else wants to hurt God loving Texans other than the radical left? No one that's who. The radical left is lying to you about climate change so they can hide their secret Jewish space lasers and punish anyone on the right for speaking out. Like, if you're on the right you're not even allowed to speak anymore, at all, about anything. It's always the left agenda this, or left agenda that, bo one listens to the right anymore. The radical left terrorists have bullied the right with fake climate change so now when there's a national disaster the left can come out with their conspiracy theories about climate change when we really know what they're doing. The left terrorists hate America and want to destroy it by making more natural disasters, and making them more serious then lie to your face and call it climate change when it's really them who are causing natural disasters to change in our climate to silence the right.

~Hopefully obvious that is parody~

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's like utterly humorless Art Bell fans took over the government.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

So glad we handed over all levers of power to these morons.

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Does this include using a sharpie to control a hurricane?

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Does it include the pollutants coming from her private jet ?

[–] prototact@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

At this point she is trolling with legislation, this is not even legislation for financial profit, she is just doing it to fuck with the minds of people that support green energy transition against climate change. Pure malicious glee. I hope she faces mob justice at this point.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 166 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Alas "express purpose" is in there. Clearly the express purpose for petrol companies is profit. And CO2, other pollutants are just inadvertent things that happened on the way to (destroying the planet for) profit. I mean they only sold the petrol products, they didn't force people that purchased the gasoline to burn it. Maybe we can go after the combustion engine producers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

All pollution?!? Make all pollution illegal?!?!?

That’s what it is, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

There is a nugget of 'truth' here:

https://csl.noaa.gov/news/2023/390_1107.html

I can't find my good source on tis, but there are very real proposals to seed the arctic or antarctic with aerosols to stem a runaway greenhouse gas effect.

It's horrific. It would basically rain down sulfiric acid onto the terrain; even worse than it sounds. But it would only cost billions, not trillions of other geoengineering schemes I've scene.

...And the worst part is it's arctic/climate researchers proposing this. They intimately know exactly how awful it would be, which shows how desperate they are to even publish such a thing.

But I can totally understand how a layman (maybe vaguley familiar with chemtrail conspiracies) would come across this and be appalled, and how conservative influencers pounce on it cause they can't help themselves.

Thanks to people like MTG, geoengineering efforts will never even be considered. :(


TL;DR Scientists really are proposing truly horrific geoengineering schemes "injecting chemicals into the atmosphere" out of airplanes. But it's because of how desperate they are to head off something apocalyptic, and it's not even close to being implemented. They're just theories and plans.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

There was that guy that talked about various geoengineering schemes that we could consider if we are not going to do anything else. From 2007, by David Keith....

https://www.ted.com/talks/david_keith_a_critical_look_at_geoengineering_against_climate_change

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

you and i both know that she is not talking about any actual scientific proposal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If this unintentionally regulates greenhouse gas emissions I’m going to laugh so hard.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What an absolute fucking idiot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Laws aren't auto-enforcing magic. Any time that fossil fuel companies violate this stupid law (written for purely performative reasons) it simply wouldn't be enforced.

Similarly, if the law allows for civil action, a multitude of reasons would be conjured on demand explaining why the lawsuit couldn't move forward against fossil fuel companies. If it managed to move through district courts, it would simply wind up on the supreme court docket and they would again conjure up some reasons why the suit was invalid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

This reminds me, I need to sharpen my guillotine.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So would preventing “geoengineering” also prevent trying to stop climate change?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought she'd prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These aren't serious people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago

I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is performative ignorance, to please the home schooled bible toting cretins who vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›