this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
374 points (98.7% liked)

politics

24353 readers
4139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Party of small government everybody. If they didn't have double standards and lies, they wouldn't have any standards or things to talk about.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Getting rid of congress would make the government smaller

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Mike Johnson is fucking spooky. I've been saying this for a few years now, when his Covenant Eyes usage made news.

He is a true believer, he's on a mission from god. He's smart. He will not care about the people crushed by the machine, as that is the fruit of their depravity in his worldview.

Watch this motherfucker. Trump and Vance are motivated by greed and power. You need to look to fundamentalist Islamic leaders for a similar mindset to Johnson.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Or Netanyahu

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hey everyone the Constitution is unconstitutional!

-MAGA Mike

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That tracks. They treat the Constitution the same way they treat the Bible. What is written there doesn’t matter. It’s not a thing that actually exists but a concept, and that concept “says” whatever they want it to say.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I couldn't have said it any better.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world -3 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

Why is every word in the title beginning with a capital letter? This is an eyesore and annoying to read. Only the first word of a sentence, names, months and days, some abbreviations and "I" should be written with a capital letter. As explained here.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

Of all the things even vaguely related to this post to be upset with, you chose to comment on title casing?

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Because it is a title. Duh.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

It’s the American standard for titles I think.

[–] reminiscensdeus@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It's common to capitalize words in a title (other than exception words like "of"). It actually says this in your link.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You mean like in this post that you yourself submitted?

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Lol, touché

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Don’t worry everyone, the democrats will do absolutely nothing to stop them. They are complicit in all of this.

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not all of them, and being a defeatist crybaby helps no one but the nazi scumbags.

Do better, unless of course you’re a nazi scumbag; if that’s the case help yourself to a giant refreshing glass of bleach.

Note: looks like at least 1 Nazi saw it, don’t be shy? Try the bleach, you’ll love it.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They can’t even do anything. Everything in Federal is one sided until Midterms.. unless Donald gets rid of that too.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 5 hours ago

They could have voted to impeach recently, instead they chose to normalize the president not needing approval to do acts of war.

And before that there was the budget.

And before that they censured Al Green.

And before that they approved Trump's nominees.

But yeah, Democrats are totally powerless to do anything. I'm sure that will convince people they're worth their time.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

He should, for a change, read and try to understand the Constitution he has sworn to uphold. Or, if he is to stupid for that, have someone slowly explain it to him.

It can't be "unconstitutional" when it is right in the Constitution.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

The reason he's saying wrong things is not due to lack of understanding. It's because he's a power-mad liar.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

He doesn’t know what the Constitution is, like he doesn’t know what the Declaration of Independence is as well. He even stated boycotting is illegal, and you shouldn’t protest against Israel.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

Imagine being so cucked that you give away your already incredibly narrow and ever shrinking powers. What a fucking buffoon.

[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 159 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Our Constitution is unconstitutional!

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

By denying the Constitution of the United States in violation of his Oath of Office, House Speaker Mike Johnson is unironically committing treason right now.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 7 points 4 hours ago

So he's next up to be president.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 70 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Its like they believe "constitutional" means "the way I want it"

[–] abdominable@lemm.ee 27 points 21 hours ago

Why wouldn't it, they do that with everything else. Ask a conservative if they hate something and they say they don't hate because it's a sin. Ask them to describe how they feel, and they describe hate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 84 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The constitution explicitly says what to do with this motherfucker. Stop being such pussies and do it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 46 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

How the hell can these people call themselves conservative. What kind of conservative calls for greater executive power?

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They're regressive and refuse to admit it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They're royalists but don't want to face reality, they want a king but saying that is about the least American thing you could possibly do.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Conservative means "There must be in-groups for the law to protect but not bind, and out-groups for the law to bind but not protect." That's it. They are childish assholes that only care about power for their group, and keeping other people out of power. They are the worst sort of people.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

Funny, that's the same for fascists.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 32 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Well, the War Powers Act is unconstitutional - but in the other direction. Deploying military force requires a declaration of war, which requires congressional approval, but the War Powers Act circumvents that by pretending that using euphemisms to describe military actions instead of calling it war makes it different, somehow.

[–] Sorrow3527@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So like a special military operation

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Exactly.

See also: Military Operations Other Than War, Low Intensity Conflicts, Police Action (e.g. Vietnam).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And that’s kind of a problem. As far as I see, this use of the war powers act is entirely consistent with previous uses. Trumps not wrong for once.

Maybe the part about not bothering to inform Congress because “they’ll see it in the news”.

Our outrage seems to be mainly that he chose poorly, or maybe even that we haven’t been conditioned to agree with it. Iran has been pursuing nuclear weapons for years(decades?) and I certainly agree the world becomes a more dangerous, unstable place as more countries obtain nuclear weapons. Sanctions haven’t been working, but you combine this with Israel’s assassinations and it should be effective at stopping their program.

Of course I don’t know that anyone tried negotiating from a point of respect for their sovereignty nor was this in response to hostilities against our Interests or any urgent threat (that we’re aware of). You can’t just bomb people you disagree with, but this really seems consistent with previous administrations and the only difference is the propaganda war to manipulate support

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Trumps not wrong for once.

He's definitely wrong morally, constitutionally, and strategically just not legally, per how the courts have (mis)interpreted the constitution.

Sanctions haven’t been working

Well, in order to work, they'd have to have a coherent objective.

They did work at bringing Iran to the negotiating table, which led to Obama's Iran deal. The only problem being that Obama made it, so Trump had to hate it. The only thing the US actually wants from Iran is for it to be an enemy the president can bomb to look tough.

it should be effective at stopping their program.

The program that we have no evidence actually existed, that is. Certainly, if they weren't actively persuing one before, they'd be mad not to now. How else could they stop the frequent, random unprovoked aggression from the US?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I mean yeah, I didn’t claim this action was morally or even strategically acceptable, just that it seems consistent with the way past administrations have used the same power.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Trump cock sucker sucks more of Trump's cock. Fucking cool man. Dems remain nonexistent. I used to think the 'we need a do over' crowd was a bit dramatic but more every day I'm finding it a hard point to argue. These fucking ignorant narcissists just soiling and eroding what our country stands for and the fact that none of our elected officials are doing anything infuriates the shit out of me. Yes I do see the benefit in Judicial actually standing up to a lot of this and celebrate their efforts, but it sdoing nothing to stop them from trying over and over and over.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 57 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Good job giving away your own powers dickhead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Do these people understand that once they give away these powers the next person who wrestles away power from trump may see them as an enemy? With the constitutional power to disappear homegrown terrorists nobody is safe.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Maybe they don't expect that to be a possibility...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›