this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
716 points (90.5% liked)

memes

15709 readers
3838 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it was obviously blue and yellow.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's like blue and an ugly desaturated goldenrod. Because it's sort of yellowish instead of black I think that's why it tricks people's brains.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I found this image to be a really good way to distill the issue down into the two different modes or perception:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_dress#/media/File:Wikipe-tan_wearing_The_Dress_reduced.svg

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I initially saw black and blue, but after scrolling to the top of this thread yesterday I could only see white and gold and again today, even zooming in.

Immediately switched to black and blue after reading that.

The mind is a fascinating thing.

Edit: Holy crap I'm back to white and gold.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 134 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I'm still convinced this is the biggest troll. It's clearly white and gold

[–] Nelots@lemmy.zip 72 points 2 days ago (20 children)

I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.

The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] 474D@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

You can literally sample the rgb values and see it's blue and black

Edit: am I part of the joke here??? It's clearly blue and black...

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 83 points 2 days ago (15 children)

am I part of the joke here??? It's clearly blue and black...

The objective fact is…it is a blue and black dress. Other photos of the same dress show that.

But I cannot, for the life of me, see how anyone can possibly get that from this photo. Sample the RGB values all you want and it clearly is not black in this photo. The exposure and white balance have messed around with it so much it is incomprehensible to me how anyone can see it as blue and black.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"The phenomenon revealed difference in human color perception..."

Yes, you're becoming a part of the joke. People LITERALLY see the dress differently. It doesn't matter what the objective facts are. TBH, it says a lot about humanity. Even when we have evidence that subjective experiences can vary, and even contradict each other, we still end up arguing over whose viewpoint is "correct".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (20 children)

It appears white/gold to me on it's own, I've never been able to see anything different.

Grabbing this specific image and sampling the colours though; they appear more of a grey/brown colour. I can sorta maybe understand blue, but definitely not black.

This is just using Polish photo editor on android:

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (32 children)

This is exactly the thing.

Whatever the dress may be in reality, the photo of it that was circulated was either exposed or twiddled with such that the pixels it's made of are indeed slightly bluish grey trending towards white (i.e. above 50% grey) and tanish browny gold.

That is absolutely not up for debate. Those are the color values of those pixels, end of discussion.

Edit to add: This entire debacle is a fascinating case of people either failing to or refusing to separate the concept of a physical object versus its very inaccurate representation. The photograph of the object is not the object: ce n'est pas une robe.

The people going around in this thread and elsewhere putting people down and calling them "stupid" or whatever else only because they know that the physical dress itself is black and blue based on external information are studiously ignoring the fact that this is not what the photograph of it shows. That's because the photograph is extremely cooked and is not an accurate depiction. The debate only exists at all if one party or the other does not have the complete set of information, and at this point in history now that this stupid meme has been driven into the ground quite thoroughly I should hope that all of us do.

It's true that our brains can and will interpret false color data based on either context or surrounding contrast, and it's possible that somebody deliberately messed with the original image to amplify this effect in the first place. But the fact remains that arguing about what the dress is versus how it's been inaccurately depicted is stupid, and anyone still trying that at this late stage is probably doing so in bad faith.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, I do remember ten years ago.

[–] SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This concludes your long term memory exam. Please see the lady at the front desk to schedule your short term exam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I swear it was blue and black this morning, but now it's white and gold!

[–] BendingHawk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Opposite happened to me, white and gold this morning but black and blue now 🤯

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Same here, I know it's the same post since I up voted it.

[–] goofystench@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

whats next? are you gonna post who remembers yanny/laurel? bitch be fr

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's pale blue and gold, right?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Just asked my kids (Not around for the first time). One says blue and black/gray and the other said purple and green/gray. I've never known anyone who actually saw it as white and gold. Only heard that people do.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It’s black and gold. Duh….

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's a pretty good Slate article on this dress, and how important this image became:

https://slate.com/technology/2017/04/heres-why-people-saw-the-dress-differently.html

When I look at the image attached to this post, I can't see anything but white and gold, as I always have. This, in spite of now knowing it's black and blue.

[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 63 points 2 days ago (19 children)

For your information : the dress is really blue and black, according to the store and manufacturer. The vast majority of people see it as white and gold, but I personally think most people are not used to decrypting overexposed pictures, hence their inability to perceive the right colors.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

not used to decrypting overexposed pictures

I used to see it black and blue, now I see it white and gold.

+ I do photography and often have to work with overexposed pictures

Edit: just looked at it again now its black and blue. Wtf brain

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

overexposure is not the issue but improper white balance, the camera was probably set for ~6800K but the lighting in the room was ~2700K

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] rpl6475@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've only ever seen it as blue and black. I can't force it the other way like I could with Laurel and Yani. Y'all seeing white and gold astound me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Not this shit again!

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

I never really understood the debate. In reality, if you were standing in front of the dress it is black and blue. Now, if you take a digital photo of the dress and post it on the internet as a terribly compressed jpg, with weird white balancing, and brightness/contrast turned up and down it is gold and white. The debate isn't really about the reality of the color of the dress but the reality of a badly edited photo.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I still don’t see either. It looks blue and gold to me

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The blue of the dress is pretty obvious, the black details are a different, golden hue due to ambient light. I "know" it's black, but it looks dark gold

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›