this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
392 points (97.8% liked)

RPGMemes

12314 readers
506 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Instagram)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t it be intragroup if your party are all banging?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Which rulebook is that?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Memes are good at presenting false dichotomies for people to nod knowingly and say yeah, that about sums it up.

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ten bucks says the first group hasn't had a single character die in the whole campaign, and the second group is all on their second characters due to the Sybian Incident

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 3 hours ago

That's because the first group does their mimic checks

[–] bluelander@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago

I run gritty low magic games with death and safety tools. Which group do I join!?

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I want the first one but with high magic. Do you know how compelling the story can be when you're fighting racist oppressors who have access to 'Wish'?

[–] match@pawb.social 14 points 21 hours ago

sir, a second wish has hit the hightower

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, the term "in-game racism" is pretty broad. Does it mean anything that's not a human, elf, dwarf or halfling has a KILL ME sign on it? Or when elves and dwarves don't get along? Or that character races are called "races" instead of "species"? Is it racism when character race influences stats?

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

What if someone things humans are fine, but is against variant humans?

I knew it's just optional rules, but I think it's funnier to think of it as an in-universe race of humans.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"I wish for all wishes made after this one to fail spectacularly"

[–] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago

OSHA 1910.132(d)(1)(ii) mandates that safety tools needs to be clearly communicated to each affected employee.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

basically a safe word system for TTRPGs, LARPs, etc.

in my experience they're useful for large and/or public groups but if you have to use them with small groups of familiar people you're probably just not a good match for each other TTRPG wise

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

I honestly thought it was about PPE.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

In Character: I mean, isn't your armour basically PPE against injury induced by foreign actors? 😜

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

safety glasses only recommenced if you have REALLY enthusiastic dice rollers

[–] Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

D4's are a menace that should be illegal.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I wish Ted would just bring a dice tower, instead of that damn dice mortar!

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Well now I want a dice mortar

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I've used lines and veils before but that was because it was my first time running for those players and wasn't very familiar with what is or is not ok for them

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 21 hours ago

Methods like the X card or „lines and veiles“, that you can use to define with what you are comfortable or not and to stop in-game if needed.

[–] match@pawb.social 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

D&D? No thanks

buys yet another no-violence rules-light queer indie rpg book

[–] GFGJewbacca@midwest.social 21 points 1 day ago

Love me some Thirsty Sword Lesbians.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

There's "everything goes exactly as planned until one player derails the whole session unhindered by rolls or turns" rules-light and "let things flow more naturally and allow things outside the rules if everyone thinks they add to the story" rules-light though...

Personally I much prefer the presence of rules which can be followed if convenient or desired, or ignored if you'd rather, but it is also equally valid to want to do collaborative storytelling/investigation without being derailed by bad rolls, I just know that dealing with setbacks and things not going to plan (which is different to things not succeeding in a pre-planned manner, but again equally valid, along with everything going well if you'd rather) is probably my favourite part

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That sounds fun actually.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Both of what are valid?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 63 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Safety tools shouldn't be lumped under style of play, IMO.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago

Yeah, if anything, they're MORE important in a gritty game with death and racism. The further a campaign is likely to go, the more you need to know what's "too far".

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 12 points 1 day ago
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 43 points 1 day ago

"And your character?"

"Three kobolds named Jeff."

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

Most the time when people say 'no in game racism' they mean 'these races are bad and these races are good!'

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

safety tools: oh-oh the dragon slipped and impaled itself on your spear which you did not know was actually +10 and guaranteed critical against dragons

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 9 points 22 hours ago

Dragon OSHA is on their way, now.

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gritty, low magic, character death, in game racism… are you sure they first game isn’t the old war hammer pen and paper tabletop?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want "lots of the safety tools". I want something useful and effective, not just heaping a whole bunch on and assuming more is better.

Honestly, you only need three at most: a way to set limits beforehand, a way to calibrate during and a safe word for when it goes wrong. Thats not "lots"

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From my limited understanding of the English language, the comma before the and makes it so that the "lots" refers to the intergroup romance, not the safety tools. I think.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In formal English, the comma is just wrong. Informally, I agree it does a very effective job of making the message get across that way.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

But a much better way would be to say "with safety tools and lots of inter-group romance".

load more comments
view more: next ›