Archpawn

No. Benefits from spells of the same name do not stack.

It would generally be better to put them in pair-wise marriages, but when there's a kaiju on the loose, you can't wait multiple hours to cast it multiple times.

It says you can't benefit from it again unless widowed. Once someone is they can benefit from it as often as they want.

Also, you could still marry someone else and have them benefit from it again.

I was thinking it was a grapple thing, but Huge is already big enough to grapple anything.

I think an awesome way to use them would be to have the BBEG be a planeswalker. When the fight starts, the DM pulls out a Magic deck and starts playing Magic against D&D.

I'm imagining someone switching to Pathfinder 2e, not telling anyone, and whenever it comes up they say it's house rules.

How much trouble is it to keep learning different systems?

I'm terrible at coming up with backstories. I guess that means I don't have any insecurities.

Barely. You can throw a potato to get rid of an orc. But this is only occasionally useful and only in the early game. Once it starts costing two or more potatoes to get rid of one orc, it's a bad idea.

I'm assuming that even though the DM pretends to be annoyed, he actually thinks all these shenanigans are awesome and is bending the rules to let them work.

I want to see a campaign where you have to protect an endangered tarrasque from a group of aarakocra that are trying to poach it.

I'm not a fan of the reflect ability. It's just immunity, but a bit worse if the party doesn't know about it ahead of time.

It would be much more interesting if it didn't negate attacks it fails to reflect.