this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
392 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23984 readers
2960 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

So the trump administration is fully admitting that the insurrection attempting to block the certification of the Presidential election 2021 on Jan 6 was open rebellion?

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

I know this is sarcasm but, sadly, they don't. I have talked to a few of them. Some either say it is patriot8c and others said it didn't happen.

You can't win

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 53 minutes ago

They admit no such thing.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit (not the political scientist who passed away in 2010, a younger one who is alive still).

[–] vala@lemmy.world 8 points 50 minutes ago

Can California please just withhold taxes already and put this country out of its misery?

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 25 points 2 hours ago

Isn't this the same as saying *the government is working against the will of it's populace"

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 28 points 2 hours ago
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 16 minutes ago

You know if you shatter a spark plug, those little bits will 100% break a car window when thrown?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder now what my ex-housemate thinks of Trump. He is one of those centrist types who thinks excessive power from one side needs to be counteracted by the other, but mostly pay lip service to the right. He dislikes the right in his country which ruled for 13 years and voted centre left, but supports Trump and right wing parties in Europe because of too much immigration in the West. But at the same time, he supports Palestine. My ex-housemate means well for the most part, but he is one of those men who are vulnerable to disinformation.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

He dislikes the right in his country which ruled for 13 years and voted centre left, but supports Trump and right wing parties in Europe because of too much immigration in the West

If feels like you're burying the lede here.

"In his country" suggests he's an immigrant. This means he too, is an immigrant right? How does he resolve this hypocrisy? Or when he says "too much immigration in the West" is he just a racist and is referring to people with different color skin?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

“In his country” suggests he’s an immigrant. This means he too, is an immigrant right? How does he resolve this hypocrisy?

Duh, because he's one of the good immigrants.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Or the person you're replying to, talking about an EX-house mate is the the immigrant. You're reading suggestions that aren't there.

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

So is the red line crossed yet or is the goal post once again some indeterminate point in the future.

History won't tell the beginning of the Trump regime at that indeterminate point. It began when he rode down that piss yellow escalator.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

" In addition, the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion." 100% illegal according to Posse Comitatus Act.

Deploying Marines, Space Force, Navy Army or Airforce in the US against the US is prohibited

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Minor nitpick: national guard soldiers under title 32 is totally fine (the George Floyd protests), however that requires the state governor's approval. Trump bypassed that by putting them on title 10 orders which is active duty. Those are typically only for training or overseas deployment, and not for actual deployment within the US (though I think the south border mission may be an exception).

So, he's already violating the law, but also putting provisions to use active duty soldiers as well which is double against the law.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 95 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (7 children)

Microwave dispersal cannons can be blocked by a large poster covered in aluminum foil. Just be sure to attach it to a wood stake.

Sound cannons are loud enough to work through strong ear protection, but sound waves are still air pressure pulses. You can disrupt the flow of the pulse with a solid enough curved shield.

If necessary, storm matchs have their own oxidizer. You can light it and wind won't put it out. Styrofoam and gasoline is sticky. Use that information however you want

Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don't remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it's too tight, turn it some more.

Edit: most military vehicles are diesel fueled. They are pretty thirsty, so be sure to share water with them. Right in the fuel tank is good enough.

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

microwave canons

I did not know about these, but some quick searches suggest that they pose a major threat to people's eyesight as they can boil your retina before you really feel anything when used at a low strength.

Messed up these are used at protests, fuck these fascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Old spark plugs are really handy for craft projects since you can break them and make pretty mosaics

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you curve the aluminium foil somehow, you can actually refelct it back. They did tests on youtube where they used a flipped riot shield and it work.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Sounds like you could make a curved protest sign with plywood and then hide some foil between the plywood and a paper/cardboard layer for a fairly inconspicuous shield that can block and even reflect both microwave and sound cannons.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don’t remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it’s too tight, turn it some more.

If you're worried about blood loss, there are some online resources for how to do first aid. I think https://www.stopthebleed.org/training/ was recommended last time this came up.

I read you need to be careful with tourniquets, because they're quite painful and if used inappropriately can cause long term damage. Used appropriately they can save a life, but you don't want them to be the first tool you reach for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] black0ut@pawb.social 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Sound cannons are actually pretty weird, in that they don't work like you'd imagine them to work. They produce sound when multiple beams of ultrasound collide with an object, so if they're pointed at you, you're the one producing the sound that hurts you. That's why they're so effective.

Some people online have done some tests, and thin cardboard appears to be the best way to stop them. Put the thin cardboard before you, and it stops most of the sound. It can be the cardboard from a poster, if you have one.

Ear protection headphones (for workshops) also help, and their effectiveness is enhanced further by wearing small earplugs inside. Active noise cancelling headphones don't help and can even be counter productive, so don't use those.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 8 points 3 hours ago

To be a little more pedantic, they send ultrasound frequencies and they "degrade" into regular audible sound waves when they collide with something (combination of harmonic effects and destructive / constructive interference). The reason they send ultrasound instead of using regular directional speakers is because it's smaller wavelength is easier to aim so much more of the energy moves forwards, so you don't hear much noise coming from the source itself.

That's why they work for "crowd control". A strong enough regular speaker would bother the operator too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 90 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Calling it...Trump declares California to be in rebellion and suspends their votes in the electoral college and congress in the next elections.

[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't read as just California. It's the whole country.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The red states will also switch to only allow men to vote. They are chomping at the bit to end the 19th.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

The guys and gals in the red states are doing everything they can to be unattractive to potential partners. It is a novel way to Darwin oneself out of the gene pool, I must say.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 4 hours ago

So much other stuff will happen before then

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Which would only intensify the situation and draw other states into the conflict.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 11 points 3 hours ago

If the White House is scared now just wait…

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 50 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Oh this ia what they want. They are chomping at designating leftists as enemies of the state.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

The government in general is crumbling and it's corrupt "leaders" will need to ramp up authoritarianism as the constituents begin to question it's legitimacy.

They'll make use of dissenters by putting them in work camps, easing the need for cheap labor, and allowing the remaining population a chance at hiding from their duty to protect constitutional rights by continuing to provide material comforts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 12 points 4 hours ago

Finally. Can we get a list of other States to join them?

load more comments
view more: next ›