Glad to see my undiagnosed disorder is alive and well. #2 crew represent.

5 for me

2 if I had to pick from that drawer, but the actual answer: Victorinox Swiss Classic / Swiss Modern cutlery. Absolutely love the large handles, sharp knives and large spoons. Very nice feel in hand and mouth.

https://www.victorinox.com/de-DE/Produkte/Haushalts--und-Berufsmesser/Besteck/Classic-Besteck-12-teilig/p/6.7233.12

2, 5 if there are no clean 2s

2, if I wanted it to be round, I'd have grabbed a spoon.

2

1 is just a funny goofy guy doing his job well not concerned about what the other forks think. I choose him.

2. 1 is also nice, every other choice is heresy.

3 > 1 & 4 >> 5 >>>>>>> 2

Fat bottom forks you make the rockin world go round...

2

#2 and #3 Edit: no just #2

You cannot know the answer without seeing the underside of the forks. How will you know if they correctly conform to the curvature of your thumb and/or fingers.

One of the best gifts my partner got me was completing a set of cutlery I had grown to love via eBay and other random shops. How she found decade old stuff in mint condition is beyond me.

Well, not #2. The curved droplet-shaped handle seems inconvenient for spinning spaghetti around

1 - the tines on it are plenty long and it's narrower than most of the others

2. The other handle shapes look awful

5 is definitely the best. It offers a thicker handle edge for cutting and did not require a stamping bend on thinner material to add rigidity. The rounded head and outer tines serve two purposes. One it offers a smaller controlled side contact like the profile of a chef's knife that will focus more force at the contact point allowing for better contact with the plate and shearing more efficiently. Second, the rounded outer edge will fit the contour of a bowl allowing a fork to efficiently manage rice or other small items down to the last bite with nothing remaining. The larger outer tines and shorter overall length is also more durable and resistant to bending. It cost far more to make number 5 and the design functionality came ahead of the operations cost, and materials stock selection. All of the others were made according to the minimum number of forming operations and thin stock.

1s the best. 3 and 4 are acceptable, 2 and 5 are a crime. i dont get y'all

People who choose 4, are you doing okay? It's okay to seek help.

So apparently I'm the only one that hates the long ass tines of 2 and prefers something like 1 or 4

Long handle, long thin straight tines, large round pan so it fits nicely in your hand, 2 is basically the ideal fork

2

You 2-people are insane. It's clearly fork number five.

fork tierlist

S| 2
A| 3
B|
C| 4
D|
E| 1
F| 5

although, a non-metal handle would be better

2

Obviously depends on what you're about to eat

My partner has ADHD and autism and they swear by 5. That's IKEA's cheap fork and in our house I'm forced to use all the other forks (which are better so whatever). In their words: "all the other ones are too pointy". I don't fucking know.

2, obviously

They are all OK. But I spent 7 years eating with a trident, so what do I know.

All of them have a flat handle. My personal preference is for a cylindrical handle. Heavier and easier to hold. Flat cutlery that looks like it was stamped out of sheet metal won’t do at all.

1

3 looks better balanced and crafty enough. 5 looks like a dessert fork

Many go for 2, but they are just thinking about using it, not cleaning it. More surface to clean plus extra volume which fills quicker the place where forks, knives and spoons are stored till they dry

1 is too bended.

Only #2. Having a consistent set of cutlery is priceless.

2