Routhinator

joined 2 years ago
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 13 hours ago

And he suffered for 80.

Loud, energizing music will calm you by feeding a steady stream of dopamine.

Sadly this is also why I can fall asleep at a party after a coffee.

Trial at Bernies? OK WERE DOING TRIAL AT BERNIES! This is going to be legend-wait for it....

The beauty is that you can shove Pi in it of course.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hence the groups having the ticket name related to the task I am working on. When the task closes I delete that group once I've ensured anything important for future context is documented and then I say goodbye with confidence.

I don't bookmark things for work tasks, I log them in tickets or commit it to readme/code comments/team docs somewhere.

Edit: I should also note that my workflow uses Simple Tab Groups and not much of this new core feature.

Simple tab groups hides all other tabs and you switch groups via a dropdown. I usually only have 10-12 tabs open at once.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 32 points 6 days ago

It's Twitter in a trenchcoat saying "whats up fellow fediverse apps".

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Agile and task reprioritization at work.

Too many projects to work on at home.

Games.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The way they did it though.. the tab group name cant be collapsed so it takes a lot of room. I find I'm still using task oriented groups from the Simple Tab Groups extension, and then using the new core groups feature as a way to group subtopics for that task.

And before you say "you must have a million tabs".. I used to have millions of tabs, but now i average less than 100 when I have a lot of tasks I need to balance, and I know what all of them are open for. So when I complete a task I delete the Simple Tab Group and say by Felicia to all those tabs.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, someone's confusing the parties goals here

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I just hoarded this gif

 

So much food.

 

Title says it all. He sells Scrooge better than any other movie adaptation I've seen.

 

As the title says, I'm curious if they ever named or revisited this Human civilization in the later parts of the timeline in any way? It seems like too good of an opportunity to not revisit it at some point.

My searches did not reveal any answer, so thought I'd ask my fellow trek nerds.

-43
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Routhinator@startrek.website to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

This is the most unfiltered article I've read from The Atlantic... by the time I finished the second paragraph I had to re-read the title to understand how I got here.

Edit: To be clear, this has been revealed as satire, its just so close to reality one could be forgiven for confusing the two.

 

Just had this one shared with me directly on signal and could not find it in here, nor could I find a source. Too good not to share though. If someone knows the meme creator I'll update this with proper credit.

 

Riker came down on a whole other deck and wants answers.

view more: next ›