this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
730 points (99.3% liked)

News

28314 readers
4981 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Critics accused Trump and his administration of using ChatGPT to create its new tariff formula, which mirrors AI-generated outputs.

Commentators highlighted that the tariffs appear based on a simplistic calculation: divide the U.S. trade deficit with a country by total imports, or default to 10%.

Analysts slammed the approach as flawed and dangerous.

Markets reacted sharply, with the S&P 500 falling over 4% and Nasdaq dropping more than 5%.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago

I guess that's why Musk is so fixated on his sci-fi religious trope of making a "multi-planet species", in case he ruins this one...

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Not exactly how I expected AI to kickoff the apocalypse.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They expected anything more from this moron? Hopefully not.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 1 hour ago

I didn't think he knows how to read or use a computer. So no.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago

We are literally a Black Mirror episode watched right now in some parallel universe. Probably with the viewers going "it's a little far fetched!"

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why is it such a stretch to understand that the same mastermind behind the hurricane predicting sharpie, is using AI to turn the entire world against us?

Normal Thursday in America.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 4 points 1 hour ago

How people can liaten to him talk and think he's smart is beyond me. In any other country, he would live under a bridge and yell at pigeons.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 45 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A sharpie for hurricanes, an LLM for trade policy. What a fucking world.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Shit, just said the same thing. This is why I should cruise the comments first.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

No worries, happens to me all the time.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 43 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is literally the plot of why Dune doesn't have thinking machines.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 1 hour ago

Warhammer too.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 39 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I found it very telling that HBO re-wrote the entire Butlerian jihad because the robots were evil, rather than the actual point where using machines to replace humans was wicked and evil

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago

I always liked the suggestion that biggest problem wasn't actually the machines themselves, it was humans letting the machines think for them. We're seeing a lot of that happening now.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

And the whole reason replacing humans with AI was determined to be evil was because ONE oligarch decided to offload more and more of his responsibilities to AI.

It made people's lives way worse until ultimately he gave AI military responsibility then everything went off the rails

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 94 points 18 hours ago

I'm certain so-called AI was used...

I'm equally certain Mafia Don Mangolini hasn't the first clue how to make use of technology in any form (other than making a stupid tweet/post)...

This is another effort foisted upon us by Elonazi and/or his Department of Gratifying Elonazi children.

🙄 🤡 🖕 🖕

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 61 points 19 hours ago (11 children)

Why go through the effort to put 0 population Heard Island and McDonald Islands?

[–] pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

I'm fairly certain it's too "flood the zone with bullshit", straight out of the Steve Bannon playbook. It's so ridiculous that this is what we're wasting our time on. Instead of discussing all the other real insane things.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 26 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

there is a wikipedia article. they are a 'territory'. they took a list of countries and territories, added basic trade data for each, and then they copy/pasted simple formulas down a couple of columns. the whole thing was probably concocted in notepad and excel in half an hour.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago

Giving them too much credit. They probably just had ChatGPT do everything.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Trump's people are stupid and lazy.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

did you see the bit where the diaper-in-chief recognized Taiwan as a separate country?

[–] Snowstorm@lemmy.ca 13 points 16 hours ago

This need to be said louder!

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 46 points 19 hours ago

They are so fucking stupid.

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago

"Make a list of every country that runs a trade deficit."

"Now apply that formula you suggested."

"Now write up a draft executive order that would make it all happen. Use some spelling mistakes so we can track leaks."

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

they probably prompted to list all territories and didn't go to the trouble of deleting unpopulated islands

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

They don't know enough about the world to know which ones to remove.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

TBH, if AI runs the country like it's doing right now, we have little to fear from it being cleverer than us.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago

It doesn’t have to be cleverer to make us miserable and take away our freedom. That’s what Trump has shown us.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is just AI turning on its creators to destroy them earlier than anticipated. Instead of creating terminators to physically kill them though they're just going to financially ruin them.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That would be so cool!

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago

I knew it when I heard that countries with no exports were being teriffed.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago
#Exclude Russia
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s official then: the president is an unnecessary role and can be outsourced to a computer. Too bad so sad bye Donald.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, so many companies want to start with getting rid of skilled labor and try using "AI" to write code and so on; I don't know why the board doesn't ask the C-suite to replace THEMSELVES with "AI" for an experiment and see how that goes instead...the cost savings would be immense and they would no longer have to deal with outsized egos, to boot.

Oh, why don't they do this, at least in my view? Oh, probably because all these people sit on each others' boards and they aren't about to show what a sham C-suite work is...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago

LLMs are already at the point where they could replace middle management in most places. Of course that's more of a reflection on how poor middle management is, not how good LLMs are.

And yeah the C-suite probably could be replaced too. Yeah the LLMs will hallucinate and make terrible decisions sometimes, but that's not different than what the C-suite is already.

Wanting to replace skilled labour with AI is proof of that. They don't know enough about what their employees do if they think an AI will work as a replacement. But if they can mange employees with an inaccurate understanding of what they do, then an AI with a inaccurate understanding of what employees could replace that manager.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 20 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

No. He's legit an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago

I'd rather have Gronkowski than Trump for sure

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

The AM doesn't seem so bad now.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Honestly, if an AI was running the country without some bastard prompting it, we might be better off for four years.

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Weed be better off with a literal potato sitting in the oval office.

In a suit, of course...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago
[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Anybody remember that episode of the Dollop about slaughtering birds on some island? Least funny, most horrifying, and oh yeah. Donnie T wants in on that

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 8 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Absurd. He promised to pay (but didn’t) a bunch of people to use ChatGPT to come up with his bullshit. What kind of idiot are you that you believe Donald Trump would bother to do any of this shit himself?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›