this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
942 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22320 readers
3534 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers have faced eruptions of anger at town hall meetings across the country this week, as constituents have coupled their fury over President Donald Trump’s actions with deep frustration over what they see as a feckless Democratic response.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee -4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

What would constitute fighting?

People keep complaining about Democrats not doing anything, but under current constraints there isn't much they can do.

People seem to spend more time complaining about Democrats not opposing Republicans than they do complaining about Republicans destroying America.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -4 points 6 days ago

people should just admit thier really right wing voters deep inside, there are plenty of people that votes as A D, but profess ideas and beliefs that of a republican, not necessarily a magat. there is a reason why we have so many DINOs in the DNC

[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 227 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Time for the neoliberal world order to end. Want Republicans to actually be scared of Democrats? Fill the party with socialists.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 116 points 1 week ago (11 children)

This is correct. Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries. Not town halls or performative third party voting, but filling the party up with people who think differently.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries

And that means it's time for everyone to actually give a shit about voting in primary elections instead of just old people who keep choosing the worst candidates.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not just voting, but running for election.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While I agree, I'm a "child of the internet" so pretty much any opposition research on me would have me murdered by probably everyone.

Maybe I should run. I could unite the left and right in their disgust of me lol

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe the real Modern Warfare was the blackmail material we created on ourselves along the way

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh! NOW I remember why I didn't give my real name and all my friends and activities and locations and menstrual cycles and everything to BlackmailBook when they demanded it of me to view the link my grandma sent me.

JFC Why won't this fucking thing burn to the ground.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But the corporations that donate to the party don’t want this.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And as long as privately ran organization owned by those rich people (the DNC) controls the primaries then they can choose what ever candidates they want. Like how they chose Hillary despite Bernie having more support in 2016. This is why the DNC has stopped doing primaries.

[–] KALDON@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

When did they stop? If you're talking about last time around, unfortunately Biden didn't drop out early enough for them to have one. We will definitely have primaries coming up. Will the DNC try to put their finger on the scale? Surely. But that just means we got to show up in bigger numbers than they think.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries.

Only so far as they continue to hold and respect them. We're now 0/3 on that front, so... yeah. It's not impossible, but they'll fight you every step of the way and then some. Creating/hijacking a third party and strategically contesting election will probably accomplish your goals faster. Remember that the only reason the GOP was taken over twice was because the party leadership approved of it.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Yeah people forget that the Democrat party doesn't need to even hold primaries, let alone respect the outcome. The DNC admitted to pushing Hillary to the forefront and were the ones that dragged Biden out of retirement because it seemed like Bernie might win the second time. The good politicians seem like exceptions.

Need to start promoting working families type party.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm not talking about Presidential primaries. I'm talking about state and local. Make it so the Democratic Party is full of progressives, socialists, social democrats, whatever your favorite brand of left-wing politics is. I'd be dammed careful about communists because that word is a fucking non-starter with the American electorate. Hell socialism is as well but it's not as poisonous as communism. When the party is full of... I don't know the proper term because every word I think to use (leftist? Lefties, maybe?) has been co-opted to mean a specific ideology. But make it so the Democratic Party as a whole leans further left, and those people have to be tapped to fill key roles because their presence is so large.

You are absolutely wrong about creating/hacking third party. Ross Perot couldn't pull it off despite spending about 80% what the major parties spent and capturing nearly 19% of votes in a vastly more friendly media environment. In order to achieve just that lofty level of irrelevance, a third party candidate would have to spend about $350 million and buy Fox News or Facebook. Third party isn't going to happen. Presidential primary isn't the place to start.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is way. Democrat voters want change, but they're not speaking to the system in a language it understands. The party changes not from the top down, but from the bottom up. That only happens when people with different views stand for, and win, lower level positions. Every voice changed lower down on the totem pole changes the presure on the people making decisions further up. Ultimately enough movement lower down means the top eschalons are pushed out and replaced too.

Whether it's possible to find enough candidates to start filling the party, I don't know, but just focusing on the primaries (or lack thereof) for the top job is missing the wood for the trees.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not just presidential matters. Local and state are much less fucked with. A 3rd party in first past the post just creates a split of neolib/socialists while the fascists remain united. Division in the American system is just a way to have the other party win. Republicans allowed the Tea party because that is what they wanted as well. Neolibs won't allow a split progressive/socialist with the exception of Bernie (because how do you fuck with Vermont).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Time for the neoliberal world order to end

Monkey’s paw curls

We now have a fascist world order.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean the "neoliberal world order" was just facism abroad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed.

The democrat dinosaurs will panic, telling us the large donations will dry up, without which a campaign cannot be won.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Then we need to remind them that they're not doing a whole lot of winning at the moment.
If I want a paycheck I have to do my job, if I don't do my job I won't get paid.
If they want donations they're going to have to earn with with actions, not plans or promises.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, they are doing their job. It's just that their job is to keep the left down, not to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 109 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t see people screaming at Bernie, AOC or Tim Walz. Wonder why that is…. Oh maybe it’s because they’re actually willing to notice the frustrations of their base.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Wait you want us to fight for your rights, like you elected us to do? I dunno, that sounds like effort. It's much easier to agree to what Republicans want and it theoretically looks good on paper that we wanna work with Fascists. Maybe we'll get some of their voters this time!"

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"I know we campaigned on fighting fascism but that was more of a 'if we win' thing"

[–] C45513@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

we're holding up ping pong paddles, there's nothing else we can do!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 101 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Lately my emotions have tended toward anger at the apathetic middle, not the cartoon villains of the Penguin Administration.

I know it’s a minority view but I blame all this on the nice normal people that thought they had better things to do than pay attention to politics.

If you do not see the need for aggressive responses to lawlessness, you let this happen and I find you boring.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago

i was saying where were "you before and during the election protesting, when the REPUBLICANS were up in arms in rallies all year long defending trump" this all the people that are complaining now that they dint do when was elected or before. oh wait, just after the election; the responses were i couldnt be bothered, or did not vote because im not even benefiting from this now, ro forgot.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 week ago (23 children)

This has been my position since I was a teenager: centrists are the weak underbelly because they can't pick a side and just want a middle ground.

Great sentiment, but you never have a side, a cause, and your "meaning" is always shifting to placate everyone else in the name of middleness.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

To be fair to some of those people, they're not all being unintentionally malicious. I used to call myself a centrist but that was in the transition phase between "conservative because everyone I know is" and "I have formed my own beliefs". For most people that's what the process of developing their opinions looks like. You don't swing right from one extreme to the other. You take baby steps along the way. You start to see the cracks in what people around you are saying but you still mostly hear exaggerated caricatures of what the alternatives are so you're sort of stuck in the middle because you don't know where else it's even possible to go.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] abies_exarchia@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

This is what Sinclair Lewis’ It Can’t Happen Here is about. A book about the rise of fascism in the US written in 1935.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

If "did not vote" was a candidate, it would have won every presidential election in modern history.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 79 points 1 week ago (11 children)

"We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas."- The Democratic Party

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (10 children)

Ocasio-Cortez/Sanders 2028

Democrats: No we need to do this

This is why we lose. Fucking unite for something, geez

[–] C45513@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (6 children)

if Americans are going to just sit and wait, the US won't be recognizable in 4 years, and there sure as hell won't be a free and fair election

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think we may may finally be getting our message across. Here's why:

Last night, Adam Schiff, one of the Democratic lawmakers I respect the most, was on Kimmel, and was very rough not just on the HitlerPig Crime Family, but also Chuck Schumer.

But what really struck me, was that the very honorable, polite, and respectful Adam Schiff took the opportunity to basically say "Fuck You" directly to the president - TWICE!

Kimmel asked him if he had said thank you to HitlerPig, and Schiff said he used a different two-word phrase, but one of the words was "You," and everyone got it and laughed. At the end of his interview, he made another joke that was another very obvious disguised "Fuck You."

They were obviously baiting HitlerPig into a tirade, but seeing Schiff go on national TV and saying Fuck You to HitlerPig twice marks a very new direction in messaging for the Democratic party. I hope this is the beginning of pivoting from appeasement to Hard Ball.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Democrats hit 27% approval this week...

That's ironically the level Schumer said Dems would start doing stuff when Trump hit.

No one likes neoliberals, or their policies

It's just not an effective political strategy, regardless of how you try to look at it. Even ignoring popularity with voters, even when neoliberals get elected, they refuse to do anything.

The entire purpose of it is doing nothing, it's political nihilism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

They need to understand that they are fighting for the country. And when they don't treat the Republicans and billionaires as the enemy they deprive us of the power to fight at the ballot box.

So we have to go to the soapbox. Like lemmy.

And when that fails, many of us (not me) will find they have nothing else to lose and go to the ammo box, like mangione is accused of.

And the rest of us will go to the jury box and vote not guilty.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ocasio-Cortez, at an event in Las Vegas, Nevada, said Trump has “handed the keys to Elon Musk and is selling this country for parts to the richest people on the planet for a kickback.” But she also had sharp words for her own party.

“We need a Democratic Party that fights harder for us too,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “But what that means is that we as a community must choose and vote for Democrats and elected officials who know how to stand for the working class.”

Leftists:

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So if I there’s nobody on the ballot who I think will fight for working people I don’t need to vote for them?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorkersCorps@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We can do this the easy way or the hard way - not that a pressure campaign to reform the Democratic Party will be easy, but it'd be sure a hell of a lot easier than trying to primary them out or form a new party. We should try to change them but we need to prepare for every eventuality.

The fact is that nothing is going to change if we can't change or replace the Democrats first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Voters have had enough.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›