this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
-51 points (27.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44704 readers
956 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How would you answer this, and how would you expect Chinese netizens on Xiaohongshu to answer?

I will link to the thread in the comments because I want you to take a moment and think about it first.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Stovetop@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would like to hope no one nation is the future. Replacing one global hegemony with another is not my idea of progress.

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm onboard with Wales. Let Wales rule for a bit.

[โ€“] anon6789@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh my, I can't even begin to imagine what a Texan or Creole Welsh accent would sound like if that was the international language! ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

*sneezes* *snorts* *coughs* *clears throat* *yodelays*

I'm sorry, what was your question

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still hoping for that future that's borderless and red and queer and bold.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

We'll get there.

[โ€“] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (27 children)

No thanks, replacing one imperialist for another won't help the world.

load more comments (27 replies)
[โ€“] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As an Indian, I think they seem more well-planned and more decent than recent USAmerica.
India and China does have border issues, but I do respect them as I agree with their leftist view of reducing poverty and improving literacy. I think our countries could come to decent compromise there.
Also, the communism aspects.

But saying that a single country is the future is too simple.

And even the Chinese seem to be not emulating America to be an empire.
I think their aim is a multi-polar world. Atleast if the random yt vids I saw are proper representations.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's pretty clear that despite Trump's attempts to revitalize US manufacturing, the US won't be able to outpace China's industrial growth even if they hard pivot. China is, like it or not, almost certainly the next Global Hegemon as the US' grip on the world is falling. Western Europe won't be able to oppose it either.

I think Chinese citizens are generally hopeful for their country, but more than anything I think most of their citizens would want everyone to advance. I don't think any doubt that China will surpass the US.

[โ€“] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In many ways, China already has surpassed the US.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

For sure. However, the PRC is still a developing countrt, while the US is a declining Empire. The US has farther to fall and China further to rise, especially in the next 1-2 decades.

[โ€“] OlgaAbi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean china is an authoritarian state, that kinda thing never works for long

[โ€“] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm saying this unironically: this comment could go on any dumbass thread about China's dumbass social media and dumbass AI. I don't understand why I don't see it more.

They. Are. Authoritarian.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reason you don't see it more is because "authoritarian" isn't a hard line you can cross, but a general descriptor, and as a consequence many will disagree about the legitimacy of that vague descriptor or believe other countries like the US fit that descriptor better. What do you personally think counts as sufficient to label one country authoritarian, and another not? Can you give an example of each, or is every country authoritarian? Does it matter if some are more or less authoritarian? All of these questions have different answers from person to person, because they apply to a general descriptor and not a hard metric, like "does the PRC have growing wages for the working class?" Or "do Chinese people enioy their system?" Food for thought.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ