this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
566 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19656 readers
4478 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued a memo prioritizing federal funding for communities with marriage and birth rates above the national average.

The directive, which applies to grants, loans, and contracts, also prioritizes projects benefiting families with young children.

A congressional aide criticized the policy, saying, “Considering fertility rates when prioritizing federal grants? We obviously have no idea what the full impact of that will be… It’s absolutely creepy. It’s a little ‘Chinese government.’”

The memo also blocks mask mandates and requires compliance with immigration enforcement.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Creatives: produces warnings

Conservatives: Hey check out this cool instruction manual I found!

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from the classic sci-fi novel, Don't Create The Torment Nexus

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 33 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is going to benefit communities with a lot of hispanic families, lmao.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They'll find some way to draw up a beneficial neighborhood map that excludes black and brown neighborhoods.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Maybe they’ll even draw the lines in red

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 135 points 13 hours ago (27 children)

Remember how all the protest voters told us how Harris would have been the exact same? Something about the DNC not offering a candidate that would be any better than trump?

Yeah… Don’t believe them when they try to tell you that they didn’t go out of their way to help make this happen.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 61 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

Yep. Quite a few of them have gone quiet, I've noticed. Not one of them has apologized for their cloying sanctimony before the election, no matter how wrong it was.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 36 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They have gone quiet because the project is now wound down. Dufus is in the white house, so they have been moved to a new task.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 hours ago

They've moved on to directly attacking trans people and bipoc

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. Well, most of them. Some seem to still be sticking with, and even doubling down, on the stupid and immoral position, although they frame it as being morally superior to everyone else. 🤣

[–] dx1@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You guys sound like the bots to me. Defending the genocidal politicians and the system that keeps them in power. That stain will never wash off, no matter what shit you try to sling at everyone else. Moral compromise like yours is why this world is broken.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 67 points 14 hours ago

"I was told there would be a medal".

Shamelessly clipped from History.com:

This Day In History: December 16

1938 Hitler establishes Mother’s Cross to encourage German women to procreate

On December 16, 1938, Adolf Hitler institutes the Mother’s Cross, to encourage women of "pure" German origin to increase the size of their families and grow the population of the Third Reich.

The Nazis started such encouragement early. When members the League of German Girls (a wing of of the Hitler Youth movement) turned 18, they became eligible for a branch called Faith and Beauty, which trained these girls in the art of becoming ideal mothers. One component of that ideal was fecundity. And so each year, gold medals were awarded to women with eight children or more, silver medals to women with six to seven, and bronze medals to women with five. The crosses were distributed between 1938 and 1944.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Is there some problem with underpopulation? The qons were always saying "America is full" when it comes to refugees.

[–] iowagneiss@midwest.social 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're just going to need more people in general, so they can let us die sooner and replenish the workforce.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

This. They need fodder

[–] Tower@lemm.ee 21 points 12 hours ago

Gotta be the rwhite color...

[–] riskable@programming.dev 167 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Prioritize funding for places with higher birth rates, you say? So... Communities with loads of immigrants. Got it.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 94 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 14 hours ago

They don’t even have to imply it!

They can just define it with congressional districts or some arbitrary measure that clusters their desired groups and fragments their undesired groups.

Even if this wasn’t the actual, real end to even the charade of U.S. democracy, it would take at least a generation or two to “prove” those policies are hurtful in the courts.
What then? The damage is done. Infrastructure built. Certain groups given generational advantages, certain groups left behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 92 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Not gonna fix old broken roads unless y'all fucking and making babies like rabbits. Florida? NO ROADS FOR YOU! Texas? NO ROADS FOR YOU!

The memos of this administration will go down in history as the dumbest shit ever penned. Even worse the nupties who wrote them will get cushy private sector jobs lobbying or something later.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 32 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

dumbest shit since Bush

which was dumbest since Reagan

which was dumbest since Nixon

you'd better believe it can get worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 65 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I feel like they've buried the lead.

In addition to its directives related to marriage and babies, the Transportation Department’s memo blocks recipients of federal money from implementing “mask mandates,” a reference to requirements that transit agencies followed to limit the spread of infection during the height of COVID-19.

The memo also requires recipients to comply with federal immigration enforcement in order to receive funding — the latest effort by the administration to target undocumented immigrants, conduct mass arrests and deportations, and deny federal transportation funds to so-called sanctuary cities.

So (1) no ability for public transport systems to implement measures to stop pandemics (which will be important since avian flu is around the corner) and (2) no federal funding for transport to sanctuary cities (of which Washington D.C. is arguably one).

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Both of those are illegal. The president cannot impose extra strings on federal funding.

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I know it’s possible for conditions to be tied to federal funding (like how interstate funds were withheld from Louisiana until they raised their drinking age to 21), so is it just that the Executive branch can’t impose that? (Genuinely asking since I’m not sure.)

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

So, fun fact, that was also illegal. The MADD campaign was just so pervasive that nobody cared. Extra fun fact, it wasn't a teenager problem, it was an education problem and is much reduced. The remaining people who drink and drive, or drink underage, just don't care about the laws, so there's no reason to keep the drinking age laws except for tradition at this point.

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 43 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

(just fyi, it's "buried the lede")

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›